1972 Ford Bronco Sport "california Blue Plate/rust Free" on 2040-cars
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Sub Model: Sport
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: Satin Black
Model: Bronco
Interior Color: Black
Trim: Sport
Number of Cylinders: 8
Drive Type: Automatic
Mileage: 1,496
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player, Convertible
This is a very nice original rust free blue plate Bronco Sport that I purchase back in 2008 from the 2nd Owner in Visalia, CA. He was an elderly gentleman that painted it CAMO and used it for his hunting rig until he was unable to climb it/out and purchased a Polaris to replace it. He had the transmission rebuilt just prior to selling it to me. I repainted it in/out with Satin Black and installed new
Ford Bronco for Sale
1972 ford bronco old school body style
1970 ford bronco classic 66 - 77
1966 ford bronco classic 66 - 77
1985 ford bronco *"frame-on" restoration* ***no reserve**********
1969 ford bronco 4x4 302 v8 wild horses 5.5" suspension rock climber runs great(US $5,850.00)
1996 black xlt! loaded out! leather! viper alarm! pa system, mud tires!(US $12,000.00)
Auto Services in Nevada
Vinny`s Automotive ★★★★★
Upholstery Works ★★★★★
Tire Xpress ★★★★★
Tire Works Total Car Care ★★★★★
Tahoe City Chevron Center ★★★★★
Sterling Auto Sales ★★★★★
Auto blog
What's in a trademark? Sometimes, the next iconic car name
Thu, 07 Aug 2014
The United States Patent and Trademark Office is a treasure trove for auto enthusiasts, especially those who double as conspiracy theorists.
Why has Toyota applied to trademark "Supra," the name of one of its legendary sports cars, even though it hasn't sold one in the United States in 16 years? Why would General Motors continue to register "Chevelle" long after one of the most famous American muscle cars hit the end of the road? And what could Chrysler possibly do with the rights to "313," the area code for Detroit?
Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT
Tue, Feb 21 2023When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.
Alan Mulally talks about why Ford's Falcon had to die
Tue, 20 Aug 2013When Ford made the decision to end production of the Falcon sedan and Territory CUV in Australia, it wasn't a popular move Down Under. The large, four-door Falcon had been in production for 50 years, and while Ford has reaffirmed its commitment to the Australian market, it's understandable that some people still aren't all that crazy about the Blue Oval's decision.
Speaking to CEO Alan Mulally after Ford's Go Further event in Sydney, Australian site Go Auto reports that the decision was not one made lightly, and that the automaker is doing everything possible to respect the Falcon and Territory's "stakeholders." It's an interesting piece that shows a softer side of a corporation, while demonstrating that Ford is doing everything in its power to make the end of production as smooth as possible for all parties.
Head over to Go Auto for the full series of remarks from Mulally, and then let us know what you think of Ford's handling of the Falcon and Territory discontinuations, in Comments.