1971 Ford Bronco, 4x4, In Good Condition Hard To Find @ No Reserve! Will Sell !! on 2040-cars
Commerce City, Colorado, United States
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:302 V-8 engine
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Number of Cylinders: V-8
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco
Trim: upgraded
Options: Convertible
Drive Type: 4-wheel drive
Mileage: 102,404
Exterior Color: Burgundy
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Ford Bronco for Sale
1995 ford bronco eddie bauer sport utility 2-door 5.8l(US $19,000.00)
1973 em2 blue ranger "uncut" 302 2v ps pb "navistar blue"(US $22,500.00)
1973 ford bronco show quality, bushwacker brochure cover model, 351c, auto ps pb
1981 ford bronco custom sport utility 2-door 5.8l(US $3,200.00)
1969 bronco with 351 windsor by urban gears llc. (automatic)(US $36,900.00)
1990 ford bronco eddie bauer sport utility 2-door 5.0l
Auto Services in Colorado
Unlimited Auto Sales ★★★★★
Toyota of Colorado Springs ★★★★★
Shock Glass ★★★★★
Sauder`s Automotive ★★★★★
Performance Wise Service Center ★★★★★
Northglenn Auto Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
Preserving automotive history costs big bucks
Wed, 29 Jan 2014
$1.8 million is spent each year to maintain GM's fleet of 600 production and concept cars.
When at least two of the Detroit Three were on the verge of death a few years back, one of the tough questions that was asked of Ford, General Motors and Chrysler execs - outside of why execs were still taking private planes to meetings - was why each company maintained huge archives of old production and concept vehicles. GM, for example, had an 1,100-vehicle collection when talk of a federal bailout began.
IIHS Crash-tests Expose American Muscle Cars' Weaknesses | Autoblog Minute
Thu, Jun 2 2016Turns out American muscle cars aren?t that strong according to IIHS crash tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put three iconic American sports cars through a range of performance crash tests. Chevrolet Dodge Ford Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video crash test camaro challenger
2016: The year of the autonomous-car promise
Mon, Jan 2 2017About half of the news we covered this year related in some way to The Great Autonomous Future, or at least it seemed that way. If you listen to automakers, by 2020 everyone will be driving (riding?) around in self-driving cars. But what will they look like, how will we make the transition from driven to driverless, and how will laws and infrastructure adapt? We got very few answers to those questions, and instead were handed big promises, vague timelines, and a dose of misdirection by automakers. There has been a lot of talk, but we still don't know that much about these proposed vehicles, which are at least three years off. That's half a development cycle in this industry. We generally only start to get an idea of what a company will build about two years before it goes on sale. So instead of concrete information about autonomous cars, 2016 has brought us a lot of promises, many in the form of concept cars. They have popped up from just about every automaker accompanied by the CEO's pledge to deliver a Level 4 autonomous, all-electric model (usually a crossover) in a few years. It's very easy to say that a static design study sitting on a stage will be able to drive itself while projecting a movie on the windshield, but it's another thing entirely to make good on that promise. With a few exceptions, 2016 has been stuck in the promising stage. It's a strange thing, really; automakers are famous for responding with "we don't discuss future product" whenever we ask about models or variants known to be in the pipeline, yet when it comes to self-driving electric wondermobiles, companies have been falling all over themselves to let us know that theirs is coming soon, it'll be oh so great, and, hey, that makes them a mobility company now, not just an automaker. A lot of this is posturing and marketing, showing the public, shareholders, and the rest of the industry that "we're making one, too, we swear!" It has set off a domino effect – once a few companies make the guarantee, the rest feel forced to throw out a grandiose yet vague plan for an unknown future. And indeed there are usually scant details to go along with such announcements – an imprecise mileage estimate here, or a far-off, percentage-based goal there. Instead of useful discussion of future product, we get demonstrations of test mules, announcements of big R&D budgets and new test centers they'll fund, those futuristic concept cars, and, yeah, more promises.