Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1932 Ford 3 Window Coupe on 2040-cars

US $27,000.00
Year:1932 Mileage:474 Color: Black /
 Black
Location:

Oak Grove, Missouri, United States

Oak Grove, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Coupe
Transmission:Manual
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Vehicle Title:Clean
Engine:327
Seller Notes: “GOOD TITLE / NOT RUNNING”
Year: 1932
Mileage: 474
Interior Color: Black
Previously Registered Overseas: No
Number of Seats: 1
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Drive Side: Left-Hand Drive
Independent Vehicle Inspection: No
Date of 1st Registration: 20240525
Car Type: Classic Cars
Exterior Color: Black
Model: 3 WINDOW COUPE
Number of Doors: 2
Country/Region of Manufacture: United States
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. See all condition definitions

Auto Services in Missouri

Wrightway Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 8813 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Old-Monroe
Phone: (636) 240-9650

Southwest Auto Parts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supplies
Address: 5345 Southwest Ave, Maplewood
Phone: (314) 776-3355

Smart Buy Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Tire Dealers
Address: 1045 S Campbell Ave, Springfield
Phone: (417) 889-2886

Sedalia Power Sports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange, All-Terrain Vehicles
Address: 5004 S Limit Ave, Sedalia
Phone: (660) 829-1829

Raymond Smith Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Glass-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 505 E US Highway 136, Albany
Phone: (660) 726-3223

Payless Car Care Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 605 SW State Route 7, Greenwood
Phone: (816) 229-1997

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Ford could post best-ever profits in Q1 2013

Tue, 23 Apr 2013

Analysts are saying that Ford Motor Company may have earned a record $2.7 billion pretax profit in North America during the first quarter of 2013, a number that represents its highest first quarter profit ever. The impressive earnings are further proof that the American automaker is making a solid comeback as the economy begins to recover.
Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan Chase are estimating that Ford's first quarter North American profit may have topped 12 percent. The firm cited the automaker's fresh lineup, but noted that CEO Alan Mulally needs to uphold the pace as the company works to gain ground in the car and utility segments.
Ford's success has been led by increased demand for its F-Series pickup, the best-selling vehicle in the US for 31 years, and by the Fusion sedan that recently recorded its best-ever quarterly sales in the domestic market. Ford is expected to release its first-quarter revenue on Wednesday, of this week.

Next Lincoln Navigator to drop V8 in favor of V6, but Ford Expedition might get both

Tue, 12 Mar 2013

A great many buyers fled from full-size body-on-frame SUVs to car-based crossovers in large measure to save fuel. But that doesn't mean there's still not a buying audience for more traditional truck-based utility vehicles, and those consumers doubtlessly wouldn't mind saving some dollars at the pump, too. According to Motor Trend, those shoppers might be in luck.
That's because the magazine has confirmed that Ford isn't walking away from the full-size SUV segment, and it's poised to do something about its offerings' economy ratings, too. According to MT, global Lincoln director Matt VanDyke has hinted that the next Navigator may drop two cylinders and go with a V6 model - the current model gets just 14 miles per gallon in the city and 20 on the highway from its 5.4-liter V8. The obvious fitment would be Ford's 3.5-liter twin-turbo EcoBoost V6, an engine that has spread like kudzu throughout the rest of the Blue Oval's large vehicle lineup.
Downsized turbocharged engines like Ford's EcoBoost franchise have come under fire as of late for not delivering their EPA fuel economy ratings, but their benefits extend beyond consumption - the 3.5L offers superior power and a better torque curve than the naturally aspirated V8. MT also suggests that Ford's 3.7-liter V6 could form the base engine for the next Navi - it has similar horsepower but a lot less torque than the current 5.4L. That may be less of a problem with the next generation tipped to go on a diet, which could level the playing field somewhat.