Dodge Ram With Fifth Wheel Camper on 2040-cars
Eldred, Pennsylvania, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:5.9L 360Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Private Seller
Mileage: 116,000
Make: Dodge
Model: Ram 1500
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Trim: ST Extended Cab Pickup 2-Door
Drive Type: 4WD
I have a 2000 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4 with a Fifth Wheel Camper for sale. Truck is in need of some body work Camper is a 1982 Alumalite in good condition.
Dodge Ram 1500 for Sale
- 2001 dodge ram 1500 sport extended cab pickup 4-door 5.9l(US $7,500.00)
- 2012 dodge ram slt quad v8 6-passenger bedliner 25k mi texas direct auto(US $22,480.00)
- Srt-10 viper powered / infinity sound / navigation / 6-speed manual(US $24,700.00)
- We finance everyone - 2003 dodge ram 1500 slt 4x4 hemi custom head turner
- 5.7l hemi - air ride - custom(US $28,000.00)
- 2010 dodge ram 1500 slt extended cab pickup 4-door 4.7l(US $21,500.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Wrek Room ★★★★★
Wolbert Auto Body and Repair ★★★★★
Warren Auto Service ★★★★★
Ultimate Auto Body & Paint ★★★★★
Ulrich Sales & Service ★★★★★
Tower Auto Sales Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ranking Dodge's Charger Hellcat with the fastest sedans in the world
Thu, 14 Aug 2014
"This is a car that most brands would never bring to market." - Tim Kuniskis
Dodge CEO Tim Kuniskis had reason to be confident, perhaps even a bit cocky at the reveal of his brand's newest halo car, the 2015 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat. As he said simply, it's the "quickest, fastest and most powerful sedan in the world."
2016 Dodge Charger Pursuit Vehicle Gets Uconnect 12.1 | Autoblog Minute
Fri, Sep 11 2015Dodge introduces new tech into its 2016 pursuit vehicles that even Jake and Elwood couldn?t outrun. Autoblog's Adam Morath reports on this edition of Autoblog Minute.
Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time
Mon, Jul 20 2015The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.