2012(12) Dodge Journey Sxt Only 7975 Miles! Factory Warranty! Like New! Clean!!! on 2040-cars
Akron, Ohio, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:3.6L 3604CC 220Cu. In. V6 FLEX DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:FLEX
Make: Dodge
Model: Journey
Trim: SXT Sport Utility 4-Door
Number of Doors: 4
Transmission Description: 6-SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
Drive Type: AWD
Drivetrain: All Wheel Drive
Mileage: 7,975
Sub Model: SXT
Number of Cylinders: 6
Exterior Color: Gray
Interior Color: Gray
Dodge Journey for Sale
- 2010 dodge journey awd 4dr sxt 4x4, 1-owner, no accidents...(US $8,495.00)
- 2012 new white flexible seating & trailer tow prep grp sunroof navigation grp!!!(US $27,495.00)
- 2013 dodge journey fwd 4dr crew(US $28,500.00)
- 2013 dodge journey(US $20,980.00)
- 2009 dodge journey sxt sport utility 4-door 3.5l(US $10,900.00)
- 2010 dodge journey se 5-passenger cd changer 52k miles texas direct auto(US $13,780.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Wagner Subaru ★★★★★
USA Tire & Auto Service Center ★★★★★
Toyota-Metro Toyota ★★★★★
Top Value Car & Truck Service ★★★★★
Tire Discounters Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
NHTSA closes investigation on 4.7M FCA power modules, no recall
Thu, Jul 30 2015FCA US hasn't had the best time with recalls as of late. Not only did the company recently agree to greater safety oversight and paid $105 million to the government, that came just days after hacking fears prompted a 1.4-million model recall campaign. However, a recent decision to close an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration means that the automaker doesn't have to worry about another major recall possibly affecting 4.7 million vehicles, according to the agency's report (as a PDF). Last September, the Center for Auto Safety petitioned NHTSA to investigate an alleged problem with the totally integrated power module (TIPM) on these FCA US models. The group claimed that a fault with the component could cause a variety of maladies, including stalls, not starting, catching fire, unintended acceleration, and airbag non-deployment. At the time, it also submitted 70 cases where this had reportedly happened. According to NHTSA, "no valid evidence was presented in support of claims related to airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration, or fire resulting from TIPM faults and these claims were found to be wholly without merit based on review of the field data and design of the relevant systems and components." The agency did find signs of an issue with the fuel pump relay in some Jeep Grand Cherokees and Dodge Durangos, but FCA US issued recalls for the problem in September 2014 and February 2015. Without anything else to go on, the Feds don't think it's worth investigating this topic any more.
Chrysler recalling 280k Dodge Ram 1500 pickups over axle seizures
Fri, Dec 19 2014Following a June investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles will be recalling 280,000 Dodge Ram pickups from model year 2005. The issue, NHTSA told The Detroit News, centered on a loose pinion nut, which could cause the rear axle to seize and, potentially, the driveshaft to detach. The affected vehicles were built between January of 2004 and August of 2005, while of the 280,000 trucks, only 257,000 were sold in the US market. According to The News, the recall will begin on February 13, and will see owners report to dealerships to have "a retention feature" added to the pinion nut.
Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme
Mon, 17 Dec 2012They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.