2011 Dodge Durango Crew on 2040-cars
4630 E 96th St, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Engine:3.6L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1D4RE4GG9BC699796
Stock Num: W41971
Make: Dodge
Model: Durango Crew
Year: 2011
Exterior Color: Gray
Options: Drive Type: AWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 33680
CARFAX 1-Owner, ONLY 33,681 Miles! 3rd Row Seat, Satellite Radio, Premium Sound System, iPod/MP3 Input, Remote Engine Start, Bluetooth, Back-Up Camera, Overhead Airbag, Alloy Wheels, All Wheel Drive, Rear Air, Power Liftgate CLICK ME!======DODGE DURANGO: UNMATCHED RELIABILITY: CARFAX 1-Owner. Qualifies for CARFAX Buyback Guarantee. Approx. Original Base Sticker Price: $35, 400*. ======KEY FEATURES ON THIS DODGE DURANGO INCLUDE: Third Row Seat, All Wheel Drive, Power Liftgate, Rear Air, Back-Up Camera, Premium Sound System, Satellite Radio, iPod/MP3 Input, Bluetooth, Aluminum Wheels, Remote Engine Start, Dual Zone A/C MP3 Player, Remote Trunk Release, Keyless Entry, Privacy Glass, Child Safety Locks. ======DODGE DURANGO: THE SUV IS BACK: Best in Class Horsepower. Best in Class Towing. Best in Class Driving Range. Largest Fuel Tank in Class. Best in Class Turning Radius. (www.dodge.com) Strongman looks with muscle to match. - Motor Trend ======WHY BUY FROM US: Huge Selection - Low Prices - Award Winning Service. Let our Family work for you - Since 1933! Pricing analysis performed on 6/18/2014. Please confirm the accuracy of the included equipment by calling us prior to purchase. If saving money is important to you, visit Tom O'Brien - Indianapolis, Indy's Preferred Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram dealer! As the largest CJDR dealer in Indiana, Tom O'Brien always has a great selection of new and used vehicles with low prices and professional customer service. Visit Tom O'Brien Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram - Indianapolis today to see how "Our Family Works for You! Since 1933."
Dodge Durango for Sale
- 2014 dodge durango sxt(US $37,875.00)
- 2013 dodge durango citadel(US $39,988.00)
- 2014 dodge durango r/t(US $44,580.00)
- 2014 dodge durango citadel(US $48,375.00)
- 2014 dodge durango citadel(US $48,375.00)
- 2014 dodge durango r/t(US $47,870.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
Wood`s Battery & Auto Elctrc ★★★★★
Wilsons Auto Repair ★★★★★
Tread Express Tires Inc ★★★★★
The Zone Honda Kawasaki ★★★★★
Ted Brown`s Quality Paint & Body Shop ★★★★★
Swinehart Auto Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
40+ cars that barely avoid the gas guzzler tax
Thu, 24 Jul 2014
The Gas Guzzler schedule, with mpg ratings and charges that haven't changed since 1991, lays out which fuel-swillers owe what to Uncle Sam.
I started thinking about the "Gas Guzzler Tax" - considerably less well known as The Energy Tax Act of 1978 - when I was driving Dodge's new Challenger SRT Hellcat last week. Unsurprisingly for a car that can burn 1.5 gallons of gas per minute at max tilt, theoretically able to empty a full tank of premium in about 13 minutes, the Hellcat will be subject to the Gas Guzzler Tax schedule when it goes on sale.
Consumer Reports says these are the worst new cars of 2014
Thu, 27 Feb 2014Consumer Reports has announced its annual list of worst vehicles, a cringe-inducing contrast to its list of top vehicles. Ignominiously leading the way in 2014 is Chrysler, which has a staggering seven models listed.
Jeep nearly sweeps the small SUV segment by itself, with its Compass, Patriot and 2.4-liter version of the new Cherokee, while the only midsize sedans listed by CR were the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger. The new Dodge Dart and the Dodge Journey round out CR's condemnation of Chrysler.
Ford is taking heat as well, with the Taurus, Edge and their counterparts from Lincoln all listed as the worst vehicles in their respective segments. Toyota doesn't fare much better, with its Lexus IS, Scion iQ and tC also making the list.
Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time
Mon, Jul 20 2015The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.