2007 Chrysler Town And Country 7 Passenger Van on 2040-cars
Blue Springs, Mississippi, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.5
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Chrysler
Model: Town & Country
Trim: LX
Options: Cassette Player, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: Front Wheel
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 99,064
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Disability Equipped: No
This a gently used nice van that needs a good home. New tires! Selling for mother in law. Dent in left rear. See pics for condition issues.
Scratches etc are minimal. Buyer pays 500 down first 24 hrs paypal.! Balance due at pickup. No shipping. Van is in Lacy, Ky. Which is near Hopkinsville.
Can be viewed at 12595 Ovil Rd. By appointment. Call Ron Johnson at 270-269-9555 with questions.
Buyer must pick up no shipping unless you make arrangements.
Certified check, cashiers check, paypal or cash only. Personal checks will be held till clear.
Chrysler Town & Country for Sale
- 2008 chrysler town & country touring
- Chrysler 2006 town & country passenger mini van excellent condition low mileage(US $8,900.00)
- 2000 chrysler town & country van
- 2010 chrysler town & country touring stow n go only 67k texas direct auto(US $15,980.00)
- Clean
- One owner heated leather power seats nav rear dvd entertainment alloy wheels(US $19,998.00)
Auto Services in Mississippi
Weathers Auto Supply Inc ★★★★★
Transmission Center Inc ★★★★★
Ron`s Custom Auto Body Repair ★★★★★
Ray Automotive ★★★★★
Professional Auto Collision Center ★★★★★
Phil Moore Buick GMC ★★★★★
Auto blog
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles: The next five years
Tue, 06 May 2014Unless you've been living under a rock for the past 24 hours, you've no doubt read about all of the big future product news coming out of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles today. We had individual brand reports from Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Ram, Alfa Romeo, Fiat, Maserati and even Ferrari, but in the interest of simplifying and summarizing, we're going to list out the hard facts once more. Of course, with all of this still off in the future, there's still the possibility that a few changes will be made. But as of what we know right now, here's what's coming, and what's going away.
Chrysler
2014: Refreshed 300/300C, debuting at Los Angeles Auto Show
FCA chairman confirms Marchionne email to Barra
Sat, May 30 2015FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne is apparently backing up his talk about the need for consolidation in the auto industry with quite a bit of action. One recent report claimed that he even emailed General Motors CEO Mary Barra to make a deal. FCA chairman John Elkann has now confirmed that the correspondence actually happened, and that it wasn't a one-off occurrence. "It was not the only email, it was not the only conversation," Elkann (pictured above with Marchionne) said, according to Reuters. He is a member of the Agnelli family that has a controlling stake in FCA's stock and is supporting the idea of a merger. The automaker is willing to "act with determination if there are the prerequisites to do something that makes sense," Elkann said. Marchionne has been pushing for industry consolidation for months. While GM has been the main target of late, Ford was also rumored as a partner under consideration. In the past, there have also been reports of FCA negotiating with Volkswagen Group and PSA Peugeot Citroen for mergers, as well. According to Reuters, part of the reason for all of this effort might be as a way for Marchionne to ensure his legacy, though he's denied that. He's reportedly considering retiring after 2018. In his opinion, consolidation is needed because automakers are investing too much money to achieve the same goals. The situation would be better after mergers, and he predicts something to happen before 2018. Related Video: News Source: ReutersImage Credit: Massimo Pinca / AP Photo Earnings/Financials Chrysler Fiat Sergio Marchionne FCA merger John Elkann
Is it time for American carmakers to give up on dual-clutch transmissions? [w/poll]
Mon, 22 Jul 2013Last week, in the midst of Detroit's first days seeking relief in Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, Automotive News contributor Larry P. Vellequette penned an editorial suggesting that American car companies raise the white flag on dual clutch transmissions and give up on trying to persuade Americans to buy cars fitted with them. Why? Because, Vellequette says, like CVT transmissions, they "just don't sound right or feel right to American drivers." (Note: In the article, it's not clear if Vellequette is arguing against wet-clutch and dry-clutch DCTs or just dry-clutch DCTs, which is what Ford and Chrysler use.) The article goes on to state that Ford and Chrysler have experimented with DCTs and that both consumers and the automotive press haven't exactly given them glowing reviews, despite their quicker shifts and increased fuel efficiency potential compared to torque-converter automatic transmissions.
Autoblog staffers who weighed in on the relevance of DCTs in American cars generally disagreed with the blanket nature of Vellequette's statement that they don't sound or feel right, but admit that their lack of refinement compared to traditional automatics can be an issue for consumers. That's particularly true in workaday cars like the Ford Focus and Dodge Dart, both of which have come in for criticism in reviews and owner surveys. From where we sit, the higher-performance orientation of such transmissions doesn't always meld as well with the marching orders of everyday commuters (particularly if drivers haven't been educated as to the transmission's benefits and tradeoffs), and in models not fitted with paddle shifters, it's particularly hard for drivers to use a DCT to its best advantage.
Finally, we also note that DCT tuning is very much an evolving science. For instance, Autoblog editors who objected to dual-clutch tuning in the Dart have more recently found the technology agreeable in the Fiat 500L. Practice makes perfect - or at least more acceptable.