Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2001 Chrysler Sebring Lxi Convertible Clean Carfax, Clean Title, Low Miles on 2040-cars

US $3,300.00
Year:2001 Mileage:107961
Location:

Miami, Florida, United States

Miami, Florida, United States

1-CLEAN TITLE. (title is ready)

2-CLEAN CARFAX

3- TOP FULLY WORKING, STRONG AND FAST.NO WATER LEAKS, WITH SIGNS OF NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR ON THE OUTSIDE (SEE PICS OR SEE CAR IN PERSON)

4-TRANSMISSIONWORKS PERFECT.

4-ENGIENE QUIET, STRONG, FAST, NO TREMMORS, NO KNOKING, JUST STEADY AND QUIET, NO MUFFLER SMOKE, RUNNING COLD TEMP. (AS ANY USED CAR YOU BUY YOU MUST DO A TUNE UP, HOWEVER LAST OIL CHANGE DONE 01/03/14. NO MAJOR OIL LEAKS MAY SEE SUPERFICIAL AS ANY CAR 107600 MILE CAR, NO WARNNING LIGHTS.

5-BATTERY HAS 10 MONTHS WARRANTY LEFT.

6-TIRES ARE 8.5 (0-10 SCALE, 10 IS BEST)

7-LEATHER IS 9 (0-10 SCALE, 10 IS BEST) SMALL CRACK DRIVER SIDE.

8-PAINT AS YOU SEE IN PICUTERS (HOWEVER LIVE INSPECTION 100% RECOMMENDED).

9-DASHBOARD VERY, VERY WELL KEPT

10-CD PLAYER, 4 CD CHAGER, CASSETT, SPEAKERS ARE VERY GOOD, GREAT SOUND.

11-POWER MIRRORS WORKING 100% INCLUDING THE REAR MIRROR.

12- ALL INTERIOR LIGHTS WORKING

12-POWER WINDOWS WORKING, HOWEVER THE SMALL DRIVER WINDOWS AT TIMES ONLY GOES ABOUT 70% DOWN (MINOR ISSUE)

13- HEATER WORKING

14-AC BLOWS BUT IT STOPPED GETTING COLD.

15- FRONT SHOCKS ARE GOOD.

16- REAR SHOCKS NEED REPLACEMENT (THEY COST 65 DOLLARS ON EBAY BOTH LOOK IT UP)

17- ALIGMENT IS CENTERED, CAR DOES NOT PULL TO THE SIDES.

ANY QUESTIONS FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT 786-3087344. REMEMBER THAT WHEN BUYING A CAR YOU MUST PAY TAXES, REGISTRATION AND MUST HAVE VALID DL AND INSURANCE PLUS TAG (IF YOU HAVE ONE JUST TRANSFER IT). IN GENERAL CAR IS VERY GOOD. GOOD LUCK.

 

I WILL ADD MORE PICTURES ASAP

 

 

 

Auto Services in Florida

Zych Certified Auto Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 545 S Orange Blossom Trl, Orlo-Vista
Phone: (407) 886-6545

Xtreme Automotive Repairs Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5904 Funston St, Hollywood
Phone: (954) 399-3867

World Auto Spot Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 2721 Forsyth Rd N, Lockhart
Phone: (321) 444-6540

Winter Haven Honda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 6395 Cypress Gardens Blvd, Jpv
Phone: (863) 508-2400

Wing Motors Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 125 W 27th St, Carl-Fisher
Phone: (305) 642-4455

Walton`s Auto Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2533 S McCall Rd, Rotonda-West
Phone: (941) 474-0686

Auto blog

Is it time for American carmakers to give up on dual-clutch transmissions? [w/poll]

Mon, 22 Jul 2013

Last week, in the midst of Detroit's first days seeking relief in Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, Automotive News contributor Larry P. Vellequette penned an editorial suggesting that American car companies raise the white flag on dual clutch transmissions and give up on trying to persuade Americans to buy cars fitted with them. Why? Because, Vellequette says, like CVT transmissions, they "just don't sound right or feel right to American drivers." (Note: In the article, it's not clear if Vellequette is arguing against wet-clutch and dry-clutch DCTs or just dry-clutch DCTs, which is what Ford and Chrysler use.) The article goes on to state that Ford and Chrysler have experimented with DCTs and that both consumers and the automotive press haven't exactly given them glowing reviews, despite their quicker shifts and increased fuel efficiency potential compared to torque-converter automatic transmissions.
Autoblog staffers who weighed in on the relevance of DCTs in American cars generally disagreed with the blanket nature of Vellequette's statement that they don't sound or feel right, but admit that their lack of refinement compared to traditional automatics can be an issue for consumers. That's particularly true in workaday cars like the Ford Focus and Dodge Dart, both of which have come in for criticism in reviews and owner surveys. From where we sit, the higher-performance orientation of such transmissions doesn't always meld as well with the marching orders of everyday commuters (particularly if drivers haven't been educated as to the transmission's benefits and tradeoffs), and in models not fitted with paddle shifters, it's particularly hard for drivers to use a DCT to its best advantage.
Finally, we also note that DCT tuning is very much an evolving science. For instance, Autoblog editors who objected to dual-clutch tuning in the Dart have more recently found the technology agreeable in the Fiat 500L. Practice makes perfect - or at least more acceptable.

Total auto recalls already on record pace in 2014

Tue, 08 Apr 2014

If you've noticed that there have been more recalls than usual this year, you may be on to something. According to a report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the US market is on pace to break a record for recalls. In 2013, 22 million cars were recalled. We're only a third of the way through 2014, though, and we've already halved that figure, with 11 million units recalled. That's wild.
Considering the past few months, it shouldn't be a surprise that General Motors is leading the charge, with six million of the 11 million units recalled coming from one of the General's four brands. Between truck recalls, CUV recalls and the ignition switch recall, 2014 hasn't been a great year for GM.
Other recall leaders include Nissan (one million Sentra and Altima sedans), Honda (900,000 Odyssey minivans), Toyota (over one million units in a few recalls), Volkswagen (150,000 Passat sedans), Chrysler (644,000 Dodge Durango and Jeep Grand Cherokee SUVs) and most recently, Ford (434,000 units, the bulk of which were early Ford Escape CUVs). So while it's been a bad year for GM so far, its competitors aren't doing too well, either.

Harsh words from senators over Chrysler's delay in reporting hack

Fri, Jul 24 2015

The federal agency charged with protecting American motorists wants to know more about how hackers remotely commandeered and controlled a Jeep Cherokee. Hours after Fiat Chrysler Automobiles recalled 1.4 million cars affected by a flaw in their cellular connections, officials with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Friday they'll further probe the defect by conducting a formal recall query investigation. "Opening this investigation will allow NHTSA to better assess the effectiveness of the remedy proposed," the agency said in a written statement. The remedy works, said Chris Valasek, one of the researchers who first discovered the security flaw. After testing for the vulnerability again Friday, he wrote on Twitter: "Looks like I can't get to @0xcharlie's Jeep from my house via my phone. Good job FCA/Sprint!" From his Pittsburgh home, Valasek had previously accessed and controlled co-worker Charlie Miller's Jeep along a St. Louis highway. Researchers have demonstrated remote hacks before, but the scope and severity of the Jeep vulnerability was unprecedented. The recall for a cyber threat was the first of its kind. Although a software patch and changes made by cellular provider Sprint appeared to fix the problem, news of the exploit and Chrysler's response brought a fresh round of consternation on Capitol Hill, where federal lawmakers had already expressed concerns about automotive cyber security. The Jeep hack elevated their concerns to a new level. "Cyber threats in cars are real and urgent, no figment of the imagination, as this huge recall demonstrates," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT). "Incredibly, Chrysler delayed disclosing this chilling cyber-security danger egregiously and inexcusably, and strong sanctions are appropriate to send a message that other auto manufacturers will heed." Chrysler had known about the security gap since October, and Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) wondered why it took the company so long to let customers know they were at risk. "Despite knowing about this security gap for nearly nine months, Chrysler is only now recalling 1.4 million vehicles to fix this vulnerability," he said. That's a potential pitfall for Chrysler, and something NHTSA will likely address in its investigation. Automakers are supposed to report safety-related defects to the agency within five days of discovery. But according to a chronology of events Chrysler submitted in its recall paperwork, it didn't inform NHTSA until July 15.