1986 Chrysler Lebaron Convertible, 49k Miles, Rare Mark Cross Edition, Must See! on 2040-cars
Suncook, New Hampshire, United States
|
You are looking at an all original 1986 Chrysler LeBaron Convertible with the rare Mark Cross Edition interior. We bought this at an estate auction from the original owner. This is a one owner car for 27 years! This car could be the lowest mileage LeBaron out there. This was the top of the line with all of the bells and whistles including digital dash, and was very expensive for its time. Everything in the interior/exterior works and the A/C blows cold. As of today, it has a brand new battery. It has the very desirable non-turbo 2.2 liter 4 cylinder, which is just getting broken in. This car will pass inspection with no issues and I wouldn't hesitate driving it anywhere. It is ready to go. Just take a look at the picture of the clean engine. It is ready for car shows, the beach, parades, etc. It runs and drives perfect! It is as close to new as you can get. There are no dents or rust on this car. And the top and all chrome is in excellent condition. As you can see in the pictures, this car is in near excellent condition. It was obviously garaged and very well maintained. There are only minor imperfections that would expected with a 28 year old car. The only imperfections include: The switch for moving the drivers seat backwards is sporadic, but all other power seat functions work perfectly, 2 missing center caps, passenger side front hubcap/tire has curb rash, pin striping could use a refresh (cheap $6 at auto store), the passenger side rear small window is off the track and just needs to be manually put up and down, rear pistons in the trunk are weak and has a stick holding up trunk lid. Interior is near mint with only some very minor imperfections (pictures.) As you can see these are extremely minor, inexpensive and easy fixes that can be done (nearly all cosmetic). I am being extremely detailed and honest with the minor needs. Most people probably wouldn't list most of these. All of the parts are easily accessible. I have the owner's manual and previous title. Bid with confidence. Finish the easy restoration, o drive immediately as is. It is cheap to register due to antique status. You won't be disappointed. Check my feedback. Good luck!
|
Chrysler LeBaron for Sale
1994 chrysler lebaron gtc convertible 2-door 3.0l(US $1,199.00)
1984 chrysler lebaron base convertible 2-door 2.6l(US $2,500.00)
1979 lebaron town & country. very rare car . must see. no reserve .
1985 chrysler lebaron mark cross vintage handbag purse
44k original miles! looks and runs great! lots of options! don't miss this one!!
1985 chrysler lebaron mark cross convertible 2-door 2.6l(US $5,000.00)
Auto Services in New Hampshire
Toy Store Auto Sales & Service ★★★★★
Tim`s Transmission Service ★★★★★
Subaru of Keene ★★★★★
Scenic Auto Sales ★★★★★
Porsche of Nashua ★★★★★
Low Cost Exhaust ★★★★★
Auto blog
China-market Jeep Grand Commander coming to U.S. as a Chrysler?
Wed, Dec 26 2018There's nothing like winding down the year with news to spin heads, eh? Allpar cites "sources" as suggesting the Chinese-market Jeep Grand Commander will come to the U.S. as a Chrysler. This Speculation with a capital "S" has several rationales. The late Sergio Marchionne said Chrysler will focus on utility and not sell cars, making it fit for a new three-row crossover. The road-focused Grand Commander couldn't live up to U.S. perceptions of Jeep values, which is why the lateral brand move. A new model would give the Pentastar a second nameplate alongside the Pacifica, since the 300 sedan dies come 2020. And a big Chrysler school runner would allow the near-immortal Dodge Journey to end its life with something approaching dignity. The Grand Commander, a stretched version of our Cherokee with three rows, uses a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with 231 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. The 192-inch long SUV is ten inches longer than the Cherokee, and 2.2 inches longer than the Grand Cherokee. Carmakers bring a host of not-for-U.S. metal over here, so this doesn't signal production intent, but sharp eyes caught the Grand Commander on Michigan streets in March. The white high-rider carried its Chinese badging, and was bereft of camo other than tape over the door handles. Allpar says a domestic version wouldn't be built in China, but either in the Belvidere, Ill. plant that builds the Cherokee, or in facilities in Windsor, Canada or Toluca, Mexico. Should these events come to pass, Chrysler would soon have four models: Pacifica, a production version of Portal concept, a crossover based on the Pacifica, and the rebranded Jeep. Ready for more? Allpar also says there are "rumors of a Chrysler-badged crossover version of [the Dodge] Charger." FCA leaving Chrysler and Dodge out of the FCA five-year roadmap earlier this year leaves a vacuum ripe for, shall we say, Chinese whispers. We're not saying all of this won't happen, but put these prognostications in one place and it starts to read like a wrinkle in time, it's all so fabulous. Remember, the last we heard about the Dodge Journey, it was going to become an Alfa Romeo-based performance crossover headed to dealerships next year. The best we can suggest for now is to stay tuned. Related Video:
Ferrari officially files SEC paperwork to register future IPO
Thu, Jul 23 2015Late last year FCA announced plans to spin off Ferrari into a separate company, and after a long wait that process has finally become official. The Prancing Horse has now filed the necessary prospectus and other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission to hold an initial public offering on The New York Stock Exchange. The paperwork doesn't mention a specific date for the Italian sportscar maker's IPO, but it's expected sometime in October. At this point, the documents also don't include some other vital data about the IPO. Ferrari lists neither the number of shares being offered nor their price. The company also doesn't have a stock symbol yet. UBS, BofA Merrill Lynch and Santander are acting as joint book runners for the deal. As part of the IPO, FCA initially intends to sell 10 percent of Ferrari's shares on the stock market. Another 10 percent of the company still belongs to Piero Ferrari. FCA is holding onto the remaining 80 percent in the short term for financial reasons but intends to distribute them to shareholders in early 2016. After the spin-off, about 24 percent of Ferrari would be owned by Exor, 10 percent by Piero Ferrari, and 66 percent by public shareholders, according to the SEC documents. FCA boss Sergio Marchionne believes that Ferrari could be worth over $11 billion. Although, his estimate might be slightly high. According to Reuters, Wall Street is actually putting the value somewhere between $5.5 billion and $11 billion. If you're thinking about investing in the company or just want to read the nitty-gritty about the brand's financial health, the entire SEC filing can be read here. Ferrari Files for Initial Public Offering LONDON, July 23, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. ("FCA") announced today that its subsidiary, New Business Netherlands N.V. (to be renamed Ferrari N.V.), has filed a registration statement on Form F-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for a proposed initial public offering of common shares currently held by FCA. The number of common shares to be offered and the price range for the proposed offering have not yet been determined, although the proposed offering is not expected to exceed 10% of the outstanding common shares. In connection with the initial public offering, Ferrari intends to apply to list its common shares on the New York Stock Exchange.
FCA seeks partner to keep building Dodge Dart, Chrysler 200
Wed, Mar 9 2016Mere weeks after FCA announced it was shutting down production of the Dodge Dart and Chrysler 200, new hope emerges to give the sedans a stay of execution. Speaking at the Geneva Motor Show last week, Sergio Marchionne said that the company was looking for a partner "who is better at it than we are and who has got capacity available" in order to continue building the models on its behalf. "There are discussions going on now," said Marchionne, according to Motor Trend. "I think we will find a solution. We continue to talk. It's both a technical solution and an economic one. We need to find a solution that works economically." Contracting vehicles to be manufactured offsite is more common practice among European automakers than it is with American ones. Chrysler's former patron Mercedes, for example, has the G-Class built for it by Magna Steyr in Austria, the A-Class by Valmet in Finland, and the R-Class by AM General in Indiana (even though it's no longer sold in the US). This arrangement would, on the surface at least, appear more similar to the deal that Toyota struck with Mazda to build the Scion iA, drawing on the contractor's expertise and capacity to build the small sedan on the client company's behalf. Only rather than basing a new model on one of the partner's existing ones, this deal would ostensibly continue building FCA models on FCA platforms using FCA components. We'll have to wait to find out with whom FCA strikes up the manufacturing deal, but we wouldn't be surprised to see Marchionne turn to a partner he already knows. The company is, after all, at the center of an intricate web of joint ventures and manufacturing contracts. The Fiat 124 Spider, for example, is built by Mazda. The Fiat Sedici that preceded the 500X was built by Suzuki. Models like the Dodge Stealth and Eagle Talon were built in Illinois at the Diamond-Star Motors joint venture before Mitsubishi took it over altogether. And Dodge continued selling the Mercedes-made Sprinter long after DaimlerChrysler split. The Ram ProMaster, though built by FCA in Mexico for the North American market, stems from a partnership in France with PSA Peugeot Citroen. And the ProMaster City is built in a joint-venture plant in Turkey, from which it's also sold by GM as an Opel in Europe and a Vauxhall in the UK. With all those deals coming and going, after all, what would one more add to the complexity?


















