1965 Chrysler Imperial Convertible 1 Of 630 on 2040-cars
Henderson, Nevada, United States
Engine:413
Mileage: 399
Make: Chrysler
Model: Imperial
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Trim: Convertible
Drive Type: Automatic
This is one of thee if not thee nicest 1965 Chrysler Imperial Convertibles you will find! If you know this year make and model then you know that they only made 630 of these cars in 65, this one has lived it hole life in the state of AZ, I am the forth owner of the beauty. The car has every option that was avaliable in 65 and they all work, including the automatic head light dimmer. The original motor and transmission just under went a re-build and only have 399 miles on them, please feel free to contact me with any questions or if you would like more pictures, the car is for sale on other sites and I can and will end this auction if it should sell elsewhere, my number is 716-982-5664 and please take the time to call me as i will not respond to BS texting!!
Thank you for looking and happy bidding!
Chrysler Imperial for Sale
- 1967 chrysler imperial crown 7.2l(US $5,200.00)
- 1965 imperial crown, 2nd owner, 97,770 miles, orig. white, w/ turquoise interior(US $12,000.00)
- 1981 chrysler imperial base hardtop 2-door 5.2l - nice(US $2,750.00)
- 1965 chrysler imperial lebaron
- 2(two) - 1958 chrysler imperial lebarons(US $1,500.00)
- 1964 chrysler imperial crown hardtop hard top
Auto Services in Nevada
Vince`s Automotive ★★★★★
Unique RV & Auto Works ★★★★★
The Specialists Detail Studio ★★★★★
Texaco Xpress Lube ★★★★★
Summerlin Auto Body ★★★★★
Sin City Performance ★★★★★
Auto blog
FCA US under-reported death and injury claims to NHTSA
Tue, Sep 29 2015The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says FCA US significantly under-reported death and injury claims due to flaws in its early warning system. The government first discovered a potential problem with the automaker's reporting in late July, and FCA US has been investigating the issue since. NHTSA claims that the problem appears linked to the way the company gathers and reports safety information. The agency is still investigating how serious the flaws are and their causes. "This represents a significant failure to meet a manufacturer's safety responsibilities," NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind.Rosekind said in a statement. FCA US admits that it "identified deficiencies" in the reporting, but in a statement the company said that it notified NHTSA of the issue immediately. The company promised that it is taking this problem "extremely seriously" and pledged to remedy the situation. In late July, FCA US was hit with a potential $105-million fine by NHTSA for the way the automaker conducted some recalls. As part of that agreement, the company also consented to more rigorous oversight by safety regulators in the future and a buy-back of some affected vehicles. Other automakers have been punished for failing to submit EWR data. Honda incurred a $70 million fine in January from NHTSA for missing 1,729 incidents over 11 years. Ferrari had to pay $3.5 million in 2014 for not sending them in for three years. Statement from NHTSA Administrator, Mark Rosekind, on Fiat Chrysler Automobiles' under-reported discrepancy in FCA's Early Warning Report data September 29, 2015 "In late July, NHTSA notified Fiat Chrysler Automobiles of an apparent discrepancy in FCA's Early Warning Report data. FCA has informed NHTSA that in investigating that discrepancy, it has found significant under-reported notices and claims of deaths, injuries and other information required as part of the Early Warning Reporting system. Preliminary information suggests that this under-reporting is the result of a number of problems with FCA's systems for gathering and reporting EWR data. This represents a significant failure to meet a manufacturer's safety responsibilities. NHTSA will take appropriate action after gathering additional information on the scope and causes of this failure." – Mark Rosekind, NHTSA Administrator. Statement: TREAD Reporting September 29, 2015 , Auburn Hills, Mich.
Worker crushed to death at FCA's Jefferson North Assembly Plant [UPDATE]
Tue, May 5 2015Tragedy has struck a Fiat Chrysler factory. According to emerging reports, a worker was killed at the Jefferson North Assembly Plant early this morning in Detroit. The incident reportedly occurred in the waste water treatment facility at the plant, just after 7 a.m. this morning. The 53-year-old worker, whose name has not yet been released, is said to have been crushed in a press and was pronounced dead at the scene. The incident is currently under investigation to determine the exact circumstances. Jefferson North is where FCA assembles the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango. The plant is located on Conner Street near East Jefferson Avenue in Detroit. We've reached out to FCA US for the official statement, and will update you as soon as more details are available. Our condolences go out to the late worker's family and friends. UPDATE: Official statement from FCA added below. FCA US has had a tragic accident at its Jefferson North Assembly Plant during the first shift this morning. A plant employee died at the waste water treatment plant. The Company is currently working with local officials to investigate the incident. The name of the employee is not being released at this time. All of the FCA family extends its deepest sympathies to the employee's family during this difficult time.
Chrysler, Nissan looking into claim that their cars are industry's most hackable
Sun, 10 Aug 2014A pair of cyber security experts have awarded the ignominious title of most hackable vehicles on American roads to the 2014 Jeep Cherokee, 2014 Infiniti Q50 and 2015 Cadillac Escalade.
Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek are set to release a report at the Black Hat hacking conference in Las Vegas, Automotive News reports. The two men found the Jeep, Caddy and Q50 were easiest to hack based not on actual tests with the vehicles, but a detailed analysis of systems like Bluetooth and wireless internet access - basically, anything that'd allow a hacker to remotely gain access to the vehicle's systems.
Considering this lack of hands-on testing, the pair acknowledge that "most hackable" could be a relative term - they point out that the vehicles may actually be quite secure.