Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1952 Gmc Suburban on 2040-cars

US $4,500.00
Year:1952 Mileage:999999 Color: is clear
Location:

Killeen, Texas, United States

Killeen, Texas, United States
Vehicle Title:Salvage
Engine:None
VIN: 755G33 Year: 1952
Mileage: 999,999
Make: Chevrolet
Sub Model: GMC
Model: Suburban
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: None
Options: Leather Seats
Drive Type: None
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Military GMC Suburban, very solid body and chassis, great build."


I have begun a restoration on it and I have all of the parts to put it back together with only a few exceptions. I have all new rubber, new interior and even begun paint and the exterior is clear-coated. I should note that I have all five original wheels for this and 4 original caps for it (the spare didn't have a cap). Only 3 rust spots of any importance I've found. The inner kick panel (passenger side), the rear door area and the passenger side fender (which is also dented, too easy to hammer out.)

I have all lights,mirrors, horns, handles, window cranks, nuts, bolts, etc. off and labled in bags. All new parts are still in original wrapping and in boxes. Most of the new parts are rubber and and trim. I also have detailed pictures of all of my work done. 

 I have a 235 Motor I'll include with the sale but is not original to the truck and is running, no transmission. Since this was a prior military vehicle the motor was pulled and there was no title, I have a bill of sale. In Texas, a vehicle can be titled to the motor becuase there weren't vin#'s for this year or any year until '63 I think. I may be wrong on that year. I only got this other motor rounded up as of yesterday so no title as of yet but I do have a bill of sale that is still in the Junkyards name. It is a reputable yard and I've never had any issues in the past. If you're really uneasy about all of that, I'll be more than glad to title it but the fee it cost is $250 (what it cost me). 

The GMC inner fenders were different from the Chevy, so I'm having a time finding one. This is not a part I've been able to find and the only part truly missing. Since there was a fog light attached to that fender I should note the fog light on there would need to be found as well, if you were planning on using it. I do have 2 fog lights but they don't match. 

I'm selling my dream ride here and I'm pissed off about it. But simply put, This is a GMC suburban, which aren't as common as the Chevy Suburbans as well as the rear seat(s) are jump seats that runs lengthwise rather than width-wise. You'll simply have to note the photos. I've not ever seen one like that before. I have videos and lots of pictures for you to reference when putting this back together as well as the fact that all of the nuts, bolts and parts I have are all labeled and bagged. 

Thanks for looking! Feel free to PM me with any questions that you may have, but I'm firm on my price and it's a bargin. 

Auto Services in Texas

XL Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2416 N Frazier St, Cut-And-Shoot
Phone: (936) 441-3500

XL Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 6450 Midway Rd, Blue-Mound
Phone: (817) 924-0099

Wyatt`s Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Locks & Locksmiths
Address: 1210 N US Highway 69, Flint
Phone: (903) 569-6060

vehiclebrakework ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: Aldine
Phone: (956) 251-3140

V G Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair
Address: 10710 W Bellfort St, Houston
Phone: (281) 498-0909

Twin City Honda-Nissan ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 10549 Memorial Blvd, Monroe-City
Phone: (409) 981-1220

Auto blog

2016 Chevy Volt will not need premium gas

Wed, Oct 29 2014

Buried in the new technical details of the 2016 Chevy Volt released yesterday was a throwaway line about a small but important change that's due to the new 1.5-liter, four-cylinder engine. The first-gen Volt has always required premium gas but the new powerplant will be happy burning plain old regular. The Volt's chief engineer, Andrew Farah, told AutoblogGreen that the change was due to today's Volt owners explaining they were not happy paying for top-shelf petroleum. "The ability to use regular unleaded was based directly on customer feedback," he said. "Since the range extender is an all-new engine, it was optimized to use regular unleaded at the outset. Using regular fuel will not have effect on vehicle acceleration or other performance factors." As Larry Nitz, GM's executive director of vehicle electrification, told AutoblogGreen yesterday, the new engine is more powerful and quieter than the outgoing 1.4-liter engine that's used in the current Volt. Fuel economy and EV range specs for the next-gen Volt are not expected until the full car is revealed at the Detroit Auto Show in January.

GM Design shows what could have been and what might be

Thu, May 27 2021

We periodically like to check in with GM Design's Instagram account to see what they're cooking up. Even better is when we catch a glimpse of an alternate history of what legendary designers from The General's past were thinking, though those ideas may not have made it into production. This week, for example, the account posted some illustrations from George Camp, whose career at GM spanned nearly four decades, from 1963 to 2001. One of the renderings is of what appears to be a 1971-72 Pontiac GTO Judge, but with two headlights instead of the production unit's quad beams. The rear departs from the canonical version most dramatically, with a massive integrated wing. Other bits that didn't make the production cut include large side vents, a gill-like side marker and rectangular intakes below the headlights that wouldn't be out of place on a modern design today. Amazingly, from what we can make out of the date, it appears that the drawing was done sometime in 1965, which makes it quite prescient.           View this post on Instagram                       A post shared by GM Design (@generalmotorsdesign) There's also a very aerodynamic interpretation of a Corvette ZR-1. To our eyes it splits the difference between the 1986 Corvette Indy concept and a fourth-generation F-body Pontiac Firebird, so perhaps parts of Camp's work on this sketch did make it into physical form. There's also a radical sports car concept from May 1970 that resembles the Mazda RX-500 concept from the same year, a Syd Mead-looking Cadillac coupe, and an Oldsmobile with a cool take on the company's trademark waterfall grille and elements of the Colonnade Cutlass at the rear. Other recent posts include a FJ Cruiser-like off-road EV, a sleek coupe with the Chevy corporate grille, and a rendering of a Silverado-esque pickup that looks far better than the current production version.           View this post on Instagram                       A post shared by GM Design (@generalmotorsdesign) It's pretty easy to lose hours in the account, but it's always fascinating to see GM's visions of what could have been and what might be. Related Video:

1983 Motorweek showdown pits Porsche 928S vs. Chevy Camaro Z28

Mon, Jan 12 2015

Last month, Motor Trend threw the Camaro Z/28 and Porsche 911 GT3 into the bear pit and let them fight it out. Way back in 1983, MotorWeek had the same idea, comparing the Camaro Z/28 to the Porsche 928S. At the time, the Camaro was America's best selling sports coupe, the 928S was Porsche's top-of-the-line model that also had the highest top speed of any car sold here. And the price differential was even more stark then: $13,600 for the Camaro, $45,000 for the Porsche. That put the Z/28's cast-iron, 5.0-liter V8 with 190 horsepower and 240 pound-feet of torque against the all-aluminum 4.7-liter V8 with 234 hp and 263 lb-ft in the 928S. Even with that and the Camaro being 14 inches longer than the Porsche, the American was a surprising 40 pounds lighter than the German. The show took them to Summit Point Raceway in West Virginia to see how close a relative performance bargain could hang with a the German GT. Both had five-speed manual transmissions, but the high-speed corners and tight sections of Summit Point would test other handling variables, including the "bone-rattling" Camaro's solid rear axle and disc and drum brake setup vis-a-vis the four-wheel disc brakes and independent suspension on the "firm-but-smooth" Porsche. Paradoxically, the larger disparity 22 years ago resulted in a closer result. Check out the video to see how the Summit was won. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Porsche Coupe Luxury Performance Classics Videos chevy camaro z28 porsche 928 retro review