2015 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 Lt on 2040-cars
33 W Kemper Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Engine:Turbocharged Diesel V8 6.6L/403
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GC4KZC85FF145834
Stock Num: T15-0039
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 3500 LT
Year: 2015
Exterior Color: Brownstone Metallic
Interior Color: Cocoa/Dune
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 10
We take all TRADES - stop clicking, don't waste another moment...CALL or EMAIL the internet department for THE NO HASSLE Car Buying Experience. Let us know how we can earn your business and build a long term relationship. We make the car buying experience fun and enjoyable...which it should be! Jake Sweeney is one of the last family owned dealerships in the area and we have been in business since 1945. Our commitment to customer service is second to none. We offer one of the most comprehensive parts and service departments in the automotive industry. Our primary concern is the satisfaction of each and every one of our customers. Come join our dealership family and see why we've been in business for so many years! Only 15 minutes from anywhere in the tri-state!
Chevrolet Silverado 3500 for Sale
- 2006 chevrolet silverado 3500 lt3(US $27,985.00)
- 2001 chevrolet silverado 3500 ls(US $17,995.00)
- 2004 chevrolet silverado 3500 lt(US $26,995.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 3500 srw lt(US $53,700.00)
- 2015 chevrolet silverado 3500 ltz(US $63,945.00)
- 2015 chevrolet silverado 3500 lt(US $47,540.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
Xenia Radiator & Auto Service ★★★★★
West Main Auto Repair ★★★★★
Top Knotch Automotive ★★★★★
Tom Hatem Automotive ★★★★★
Stanford Allen Chevrolet Cadillac ★★★★★
Soft Touch Car Wash Systems ★★★★★
Auto blog
Vert-A-Pac train cars kept your Chevy Vega's price in check
Fri, 01 Mar 2013Our apologies to those who've seen this before, but for the rest of the class, how awesome are these pictures of the Vert-A-Pac shipping system General Motors came up with to ship the Chevrolet Vega back in the 1970s? Developed along with Southern Pacific Railroad, GM was able to double the amount of Vega models it could ship by packing them into the unique storage cars vertically.
At the time, rail cars could fit 15 vehicles each, but Chevrolet was able to lower shipping costs by making it possible to ship 30 Vegas per rail car, in turn allowing the price of the Vega to remain as low as possible. Each rail car had 30 doors that would fold down so that a Vega could be strapped on, and then a forklift would come along and lift the door into place. All the cars were positioned nose down, and since they were shipped with all of their required fluids, certain aspects had to be designed specifically for this type of shipping, including an oil baffle in the engine, a special battery and even a repositioned windshield washer reservoir. See for yourself in our image gallery above.
This is your 2014 Chevrolet SS
Sat, 16 Feb 2013Think you've waited long enough for this? If so, then you'll want to savor the high-res photos we've so far been given of the 2014 Chevrolet SS, the first rear-wheel-drive performance sedan from The Bowtie in 17 years.
We all know its our version of the brand new VF-model Holden Commodore, but what's under the hood that earns the appellation "performance?" A 6.2-liter LS3 V8 engine producing 415 horsepower and 415 pound-feet of torque. That's 35 hp and lb-ft less than the same engine is expected to produce in the 2014 Chevrolet Corvette. Chevrolet says the sedan will get from 0-to-60 miles per hour "in about five seconds."
Shifting comes courtesy of a six-speed automatic with paddles on the steering wheel, while stopping arrive via four-piston Brembo calipers up front, a single sliding piston in back. The forged aluminum wheels are 19-inchers all around, each set supporting right around 50 percent of the sedan's weight, and the aluminum hood and trunk are meant to keep the center of gravity low.
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.