Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 Work Truck on 2040-cars

US $44,004.00
Year:2014 Mileage:2 Color: White
Location:

9673 Kings Auto Mall Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

9673 Kings Auto Mall Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:6.0L V8 16V MPFI OHV
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GB3KZCG1EF146906
Stock Num: 141379
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 3500 Work Truck
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: White
Options:
  • 2 Door
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Auxilliary engine cooler
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Black grille w/chrome surround
  • Cancellable Passenger Airbag
  • Chrome bumpers
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Daytime running lights
  • Door pockets: Driver and passenger
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Front Head Room: 41.3"
  • Front Hip Room: 60.3"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.3"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.2"
  • Front split-bench
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Manual driver mirror adjustment
  • Manual extendable trailer style exterior mirrors
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Manual passenger mirror adjustment
  • Overhead console: Mini
  • Painted steel rims
  • Passenger vanity mirrors
  • Power steering
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Suspension class: HD
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Torsion bar front spring
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Urethane steering wheel trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vinyl floor covering
  • Vinyl seat upholstery
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 2

Auto Services in Ohio

Williams Norwalk Tire & Alignment ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 274 Cleveland Rd, Huron
Phone: (419) 668-3071

White-Allen European Auto Grp ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 648 Springboro Pike, Springboro
Phone: (937) 291-6000

Welch`s Golf Cart Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Golf Cars & Carts
Address: 8272 Fremont Pike, Curtice
Phone: (419) 874-4985

Vehicles Unlimited Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Changing Equipment
Address: 7249 Industrial Park Blvd, Shaker-Heights
Phone: (216) 475-1611

Tom`s Tire & Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 3310 N Holland Sylvania Rd, Sylvania-Township
Phone: (419) 841-4911

Smith`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 7200 N Dixie Dr, Tipp-City
Phone: (937) 454-6449

Auto blog

GM recalls 330,000 fullsize trucks for airbag replacement

Sun, May 31 2015

General Motors has announced a recall of 330,198 fullsize pickups in the US in the aftermath of the announcement made on May 19 that doubled the number of vehicles being called in to replace Takata's defective airbag inflators. That announcement expanded the nationwide recall to an estimated 33.8 million vehicles in the US. Heavy Duty versions of the 2007 and 2008 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra are included in GM's move, for the purpose of replacing the passenger airbag inflators. The announcement made by the National Highway Traffic Safety Association cited long-term exposure to moisture as a possible cause of the inflator issues. GM says it isn't aware of any problems with the recalled pickups due to moisture, nor has it had any reports of crashes, injuries, or fatalities, and has not received any complaints. GM will notify owners, who can then take their trucks to the dealers to have them repaired free of charge. You'll find a statement from GM and the recall notice from NHTSA below. Related Video: General Motors Statement General Motors is recalling 330,198 2007 and 2008 model year full-size Chevrolet Silverado heavy duty and GMC Sierra heavy duty pickup trucks in the U.S. to replace the passenger air bag inflators manufactured by TK Holdings Inc. (Takata). This recall implements Takata's air bag inflator equipment recall announced on May 19, 2015 (NHTSA recall number 15E-041). GM is not aware of any humidity-related ruptures in Takata air bag inflators in any GM-badged vehicles in the field and knows of no crashes, injuries, fatalities or complaints regarding air bag performance in these vehicles. Including Canada and exports, the total number of vehicles being recalled is 374,715. Population breakdown: United States 330,198 Canada 39,630 Exports 4,887 Total 374,715NHTSA RECALL NOTICE: Report Receipt Date: MAY 28, 2015 NHTSA Campaign Number: 15V324000 Component(s): AIR BAGS Potential Number of Units Affected: 330,198 Manufacturer: General Motors LLCSUMMARY: General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2007-2008 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD and 3500HD trucks manufactured November 28, 2006, to August 29, 2008, and 2007-2008 GMC Sierra 2500HD and 3500HD trucks manufactured November 27, 2006, to August 29, 2008.

Which electric cars can charge at a Tesla Supercharger?

Sun, Jul 9 2023

The difference between Tesla charging and non-Tesla charging. Electrify America; Tesla Tesla's advantage has long been its charging technology and Supercharger network. Now, more and more automakers are switching to Tesla's charging tech. But there are a few things non-Tesla drivers need to know about charging at a Tesla station. A lot has hit the news cycle in recent months with regard to electric car drivers and where they can and can't plug in. The key factor in all of that? Whether automakers switched to Tesla's charging standard. More car companies are shifting to Tesla's charging tech in the hopes of boosting their customers' confidence in going electric.  Here's what it boils down to: If you currently drive a Tesla, you can keep charging at Tesla charging locations, which use the company's North American Charging Standard (NACS), which has long served it well. The chargers are thinner, more lightweight and easier to wrangle than other brands.  If you currently drive a non-Tesla EV, you have to charge at a non-Tesla charging station like that of Electrify America or EVgo — which use the Combined Charging System (CCS) — unless you stumble upon a Tesla charger already equipped with the Magic Dock adapter. For years, CCS tech dominated EVs from everyone but Tesla.  Starting next year, if you drive a non-Tesla EV (from the automakers that have announced they'll make the switch), you'll be able to charge at all Supercharger locations with an adapter. And by 2025, EVs from some automakers won't even need an adaptor.  Here's how to charge up, depending on which EV you have:  Ford 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E. Tim Levin/Insider Ford was the earliest traditional automaker to team up with Tesla for its charging tech. Current Ford EV owners — those driving a Ford electric vehicle already fitted with a CCS port — will be able to use a Tesla-developed adapter to access Tesla Superchargers starting in the spring. That means that, if you own a Mustang Mach-E or Ford F-150 Lightning, you will need the adapter in order to use a Tesla station come 2024. But Ford will equip its future EVs with the NACS port starting in 2025 — eliminating the need for any adapter. Owners of new Ford EVs will be able to pull into a Supercharger station and juice up, no problem. General Motors Cadillac Lyriq. Cadillac GM will also allow its EV drivers to plug into Tesla stations.

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.