2001 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 on 2040-cars
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
2001 CHEVY SILVERADO 3500 DUALLY. VERY LOW MILES ONLY 61,496 BIG BLOCK CHEVROLET 8.1 LITER 496 CU. IN. AUTOMATIC ALLISON TRANSMISSION GOOD BRAKES GOOD TIRES. NEW EXHAUST MANIFOLDS NEW BRAKE LINES. COLD A/C 4X4 WORKS AS IT SHOULD. EVERYTHING WORKS. NEW POWER WINDOW MOTOR. NEW POWER MIRROR SWITCH. THIS TRUCK DID HAVE A SNOW PLOW ON IT AT ONE POINT IN ITS LIFE. SO IT IS NOT RUST FREE. AS SEEN IN THE PHOTOS. IT RUNS & DRIVES EXTREMELY WELL. IT DOES COME WITH THE LADDER RACKS IN THE BACK. THE TRUCK MOST RECENTLY SPENT A LOT OF TIME SITTING. IT WAS USED TO TOW A MAN LIFT TO THE JOB SITE WHEN NEEDED. |
Chevrolet Silverado 3500 for Sale
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 3500hd ltz duramax 4x4 western hauler(US $62,000.00)
- 2004.5 chevrolet silverado 3500hd 4x4 diesel lt 2-owner(US $19,995.00)
- 2007 chevrolet silverado 3500hd flat bed 5th wheel hitch work crew cab 4 doors(US $19,900.00)
- 2007 chevrolet silverado 3500hd
- 2015 3500 hd crew cab ltz 6.6l duramax plus package z71 4x4 navigation 6"steps(US $54,980.00)
- 2015 3500 srw 4x4 z71 off road crew cab lt 6.0l vortec v8 auto bose 4k miles!!!(US $41,980.00)
Auto Services in Massachusetts
Wilson S Service Center ★★★★★
Wentworth Service Station ★★★★★
Urban Auto Body ★★★★★
T Tires ★★★★★
Riverside Imports ★★★★★
Ralph`s Auto Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM recalls Colorado, Canyon, and Malibu for airbag problem
Wed, Mar 9 2016The Basics: General Motors will recall and issue a stop sale on 1,740 total examples of the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, Malibu, and GMC Canyon. This includes 1,579 units in the US and 161 in Canada. The Problem: The second stage of the driver front airbag inflator might not be present. If this happens, the airbag won't fill as quickly as it should in a high-speed crash, which could increase the risk of injury, according to Reuters. This is not related in any way to Takata's inflator problems, and these parts come from a different supplier. Injuries/Deaths: None reported. The Fix: GM will replace the vehicles' airbag assemblies. If You Own One: GM spokesperson Tom Wilkinson told Autoblog he wasn't specifically sure when recall repairs would begin but said it would be "shortly." He expects the fixes to happen "quickly" because of the small number of affected vehicles, and many of them are either in transport or already in dealer stock. More Information: GM recalled the 2015 Canyon and Colorado in 2014 for a completely separate airbag issue. In that case, a manufacturing error improperly wired the connectors. Related Video: GM Statement GM is recalling 1,579 MY 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, GMC Canyon and Chevrolet Malibu vehicles in the United States and 161 in Canada to replace driver-side front airbags. The second stage of the airbag may not deploy properly in certain high-speed crashes. During a routine quality inspection, it was determined that a component required for a second-stage/high-output deployment was not loaded during the inflator build. Dealers will replace the driver-side front airbag assembly. There have been no reports of crashes or injuries related to this issue. This issue is unrelated to the ongoing Takata recalls.
Pony cars, trucks and Italian SUVs | Autoblog Podcast #552
Fri, Aug 31 2018On this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Senior Editor Alex Kierstein and Associate Editor Reese Counts. We discuss the updated 2019 Chevy Camaro Turbo 1LE variant, the new 2019 GMC Sierra Denali, and the Ferrari-powered Maserati Levante GTS. We also debate whether Volkswagen should build the Atlas-based Tanoak pickup truck and what a delay means for the next-gen Ford Mustang. Finally, we answer a reader question about the state of Lexus.Autoblog Podcast #552 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown 2019 Chevy Camaro Turbo 1LE 2019 GMC Sierra 2019 Maserati Levante GTS Should Volkswagen build the Tanoak? Next-gen Ford Mustang delayed The past, present and future of Lexus Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: Podcasts Chevrolet Ford GM GMC Lexus Maserati RAM Truck Coupe SUV Luxury Performance
Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015
Tue, Feb 11 2014Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper. For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011. The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors. While the adoption of SAE J2807 will be helpful for light-duty customers, those interested in bigger trucks will still be left with differing standards. There is no sign of the new tow standards being adopted for the heavy-duty market.