Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2003 Chevy 2500hd 4x4 on 2040-cars

Year:2003 Mileage:150829 Color: Green /
 Black
Location:

Loudonville, Ohio, United States

Loudonville, Ohio, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.0L 5967CC 364Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1GCHK29U73E260532 Year: 2003
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 2500
Trim: Base Extended Cab Pickup 4-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Drive Type: 4WD
Mileage: 150,829
Exterior Color: Green
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

I am selling a 2003 Chevy 2500HD 4x4 4 door 8 foot bed truck. The truck runs and drives great.  Has 6.0 gas engine.  The truck has 150,829 miles.  4x4 works good.  The truck is in good condition however if you want a show truck this is not the truck for you, but if you want a good work truck this is the perfect truck for you.  Body wise truck is great shape.  Only rust is on the gas cap door, lower rockers and  lower tailgate.  Drivers side rocker is all the way through in one mall spot and has small surface rust. The pass side is only minor surface rust.  Front tires are like new and the rear tires are about 50%. Frame is in good shape with some surface rust.  The bed has 2 small dings in it.  The truck has scratches in the paint throughout the entire truck but not bad.  The truck had decals on it at one time so the decal impresions remain.  The truck has brand new brake lines, fan clutch, rear calipers and pass side front caliper and rotor.  The heater and a/c work. The truck does need a new wheel stud as one is bent.  The interior is in good shape.  Drivers side seat has a small tear in the vinyl.  The drivers side door hinges has dropped a little bit.  All 4 doors shut/ latch/ close.  The truck is the base model so it has the manual 4x4 lever on the floor, man windows and locks.  Has no carpet, has vinyl floor. The truck does have strobe lights.  This is all the info I can think of at the moment.  Good luck and happy bidding.

Auto Services in Ohio

Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: Harrison
Phone: (800) 325-7564

Verity Auto & Cycle Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 2504 N Verity Pkwy, Middletown
Phone: (513) 422-1970

Vaughn`s Auto Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 127 W Sugartree St, Cuba
Phone: (937) 382-7149

Truechoice ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Automobile Accessories
Address: 4677 Northwest Pkwy, West-Jefferson
Phone: (614) 759-4327

The Mobile Mechanic of Cleveland ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: Taylor Road, Lakewood
Phone: (216) 744-4888

The Car Guy ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 637 S 9th St, Hollansburg
Phone: (765) 977-7907

Auto blog

GM Recalling 370,000 Trucks For Fire Risk

Mon, Jan 13 2014

DETROIT (AP) - General Motors is recalling 370,000 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups from the 2014 model year to fix software that could cause the exhaust components to overheat and start a fire. The recall includes 303,000 trucks in the U.S. and 67,000 in Canada and Mexico. All of the trucks involved have 4.3-liter or 5.3-liter engines. GM said eight fires have been reported, but no injuries. One garage was damaged, the company said. All of the incidents occurred in cold weather. The company is asking customers not to leave their trucks idling unattended. GM dealers will reprogram the software for free. The company will inform owners starting Jan. 16. The major recall announcement, which came on Saturday, marred the Silverado's winning of the 2014 North American Truck of the Year Award at the Detroit Auto Show on Monday. Related Gallery Our Favorite Cars For Winter View 11 Photos Recalls Chevrolet sierra

Chevy Volt 'acceptable,' Nissan Leaf 'poor' in new IIHS safety tests

Thu, Jul 31 2014

Ford C-Max Hybrid also scored "acceptable" rating. With US Nissan Leaf sales up almost 30 percent during the first half of the year, the only thing that might be able to stop the battery-electric vehicle is a good, stiff barrier. Unfortunately, thing's aren't always pretty when that happens in the real world, according to new tests from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Things with the Chevrolet Volt extended-range plug-in are a little bit rosier, though. The two plug-in vehicles were part of a batch of a dozen vehicles that just went through the IIHS's "small overlap" test, in which the driver's side front corner of the vehicle is crashed into a rigid barrier at 40 miles per hour. Out of the dozen, only the Mini Cooper Countryman was given a "good" rating. Five vehicles, including the Volt and the Ford C-Max Hybrid, were rated "acceptable," two were "marginal" and two, including the Leaf, were "poor." Plug-in vehicles are unique in the crash-test context because of their relatively large battery sizes. In the Volt's case, the driver had a "low risk" of injury, said the IIHS. But the Leaf's crash substantially pushed back the instrument panel and steering column, creating a scenario where the driver was "likely" to sustain leg injuries. The batteries in both the Leaf and the Volt passed safety tests specifically targeted at things like thermo and electrical properties and overall integrity. "Nissan is proud of the Leaf's 'Good' rating in all other IIHS tests, a 4-star NCAP rating from NHTSA and its IIHS Top Safety Pick rating in all previous years since the car's release," the company said in an e-mail sent to AutoblogGreen. "As for the performance of the 2014 Leaf in the 'small overlap frontal test,' Nissan will continue to review these and other results from the IIHS 'small overlap frontal test' as we seek opportunities for improvement." Check out the IIHS's press release and small car crash-test video footage below. Range of ratings: Small car ratings run the gamut in challenging small overlap front test The Mini Cooper Countryman is the only small car to earn a good rating among the latest group of 12 cars subjected to the Institute's small overlap front crash test. Two electric models and a hybrid also are in the mix, with varied results. The electric-powered Chevrolet Volt (with a gasoline engine "range extender") earns an acceptable rating, while its battery-electric rival, the Nissan Leaf, earns a poor rating.

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.