2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 1lt on 2040-cars
125 S Gebhart Church Rd, Miamisburg, Ohio, United States
Engine:5.3L V8 16V GDI OHV
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3GCUKREC5EG170943
Stock Num: S4439
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 1500 1LT
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Blue Granite Metallic
Interior Color: Jet Black
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 200
2014 SILVERADO 1500 4WD LT CREW. ENGINE, 5.3L V8 ECOTEC3, ALL STAR EDITION, 18' TIRES, ALL TERRAIN. Now that you have found a vehicle that interests you, please call or e-mail us for availability and to set up a time to come in to see it. Why buy from us? Jeff Schmitt Auto Group is now 1 of only 27 MOTOR TREND CERTIFIED dealers in the United States!! All of our select Motor Trend Certified Vehicles include: 1 year EasyCare Dent Repair, 1 year EasyCare Keycare, 360 minutes or 1 year of EasyCare Personal Assistant, Preferred Customer Program, 72 Hour Exchange Policy, and our Best Value Guarantee! E-mail or call us to check availability!!! See this Silverado 1500 at Jeff Schmitt Chevrolet in MIAMISBURG!!!! ***Prices do not include tax, title, license, documentation fees, or any dealer add-ons. Advertised sale price may include rebate or incentive. See dealer for details.*
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 for Sale
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 2lt(US $37,419.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 2lt(US $38,385.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 2lt(US $38,542.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 2lt(US $39,424.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 1lt(US $33,555.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 1lt(US $35,388.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
Wired Right ★★★★★
Wheel Medic Inc ★★★★★
Wheatley Auto Service Center ★★★★★
Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★
Walton Hills Auto Service ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM reintroduces Tripower name in the worst way possible
Wed, Aug 1 2018The story of General Motors' use of the Tripower moniker begins way back in 1957, when Semon E. "Bunkie" Knudsen, then General Manager of GM's Pontiac division, directed his engineers to inject more performance into his brand's line of V8-powered automobiles. Fuel injection was an option, but hot rodders flocked instead to Tri-Power (marketed way back when with a hyphen), which grafted a trio of two-barrel Rochester carburetors onto a single intake manifold. A legend was born. And that legend was born of performance. At idle and when full power wasn't required, Pontiac's Tri-Power system used just the middle carburetor, which helped make the setup easier to tune. Depending on the year and model, either a vacuum system or a mechanical linkage opened up the two outer carbs, thereby switching from two barrels to six, and allowing the engine to take in more fuel and air. And it was an easy marketing win – six barrels is better than four barrels, right? Because performance! So, when news filtered in that GM has resurrected the Tripower name, those of us who grew up attending classic car shows and wrenching on old Pontiacs did a double-take. And then we all collectively sighed. Turns out that today's Tripower refers to a trio of fuel-saving measures that include cylinder deactivation, active thermal management, and intake valve lift control, according to Automotive News. And, at least for now, it applies to GM's line of fullsize trucks powered by a 2.7-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine. We're all for saving fuel whenever possible. And we have zero say in how any automaker chooses to market its products and technologies. But, we'll offer our two cents anyway: Relaunching a storied name from the past is fine. Relaunching a storied name from the past while completely overlooking the reasons the name got famous in the first place is only going to irritate the people who remember the name in the first place. Couldn't they just call this new technology package something else? Related Video: News Source: Automotive NewsImage Credit: Getty Green Marketing/Advertising Chevrolet GM Pontiac Automotive History Truck chevrolet silverado
GM isn't liable for punitive damages in ignition switch cases
Wed, Nov 20 2019NEW YORK — A federal appeals court said General Motors is not liable for punitive damages over accidents that occurred after its 2009 bankruptcy and involved vehicles it produced earlier, including vehicles with faulty ignition switches. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said on Tuesday that the automaker did not agree to contractually assume liability for punitive damages as part of its federally-backed Chapter 11 reorganization. GM filed for bankruptcy in June 2009, and its best assets were transferred to a new Detroit-based company with the same name. The other assets and many liabilities stayed with "Old GM," which is also known as Motors Liquidation Co. Tuesday's 3-0 decision may help GM reduce its ultimate exposure in nationwide litigation over defective ignition switches in several Chevrolet, Pontiac and Saturn models. It is also a defeat for drivers involved in post-bankruptcy accidents, including those who collided with older GM vehicles driven by others, as well as their law firms. The ignition switch defect could cause engine stalls and keep airbags from deploying, and has been linked to 124 deaths. A lawyer for the drivers and their law firms did not immediately respond to requests for comment. GM had no comment. Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs said GM's agreement to acquire assets "free and clear" of most liabilities excused it from punitive damages claims for Old GM's conduct. He also noted that the judge who oversaw the bankruptcy concluded that the new company could not be liable for claims that the "deeply insolvent" Old GM would never have paid. The decision upheld a May 2018 ruling by U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan, who oversees the ignition switch litigation. Drivers have sought a variety of damages in that litigation, including for declining resale values. GM has recalled more than 2.6 million vehicles since 2014 over ignition switch problems. It has also paid more than $2.6 billion in related penalties and settlements, including $900 million to settle a U.S. Department of Justice criminal case. The case is In re: Motors Liquidation Co, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 18-1940. Government/Legal Chevrolet Pontiac Saturn Safety gm ignition switch
GM won't pay owners of recalled cars for lost value
Thu, 12 Jun 2014Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of the General Motors compensation fund dealing with the its widespread ignition switch woes, has issued an informal, two-letter response to the plaintiffs in more than 70 lawsuits seeking redress for lost resale value of their Cobalts: "No." The cases were recently combined into one, but Feinberg told The Detroit News that the fund will deal "only with death and physical injury claims," and that "perceived diminished value" will get no consideration.
ALG, the firm specializing in establishing residual values, determined that Cobalt owners had lost $300 compared to the segment competition and doesn't envision any long-term effects from the recall situation. Feinberg's statement comes in advance of public details on how the compensation fund will work and adheres to GM's long-held position on the matter. The company has already asked a judge to throw out such suits using the pre-bankruptcy defense, even as it stopped using that defense in cases of injury and death.
With plenty of potential gain from the GM suit, however, don't expect the plaintiffs to give up yet. When Toyota was sued for the same reason during the unintended acceleration debacle, it eventually settled the case for between $1 billion and $1.4 billion just to get it over with. Since the 85 law firms involved in the Toyota litigation took home more than $250 million of that total, we shouldn't expect the attorneys to give up on a GM payout, either.