2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 1lt on 2040-cars
14963 State Hwy. 38, Marshfield, Missouri, United States
Engine:4.3L V6 12V GDI OHV
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GCVKREH4EZ174501
Stock Num: 20452
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 1500 1LT
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Blue Granite Metallic
Interior Color: Jet Black
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 1
Special Financing Available: APR AS LOW AS 3.9% OR REBATES AS HIGH AS $3,250! Gas miser!!! 22 MPG Hwy* Hold on to your seats!!! Chevrolet has done it again!!! They have built some hot vehicles and this hot Vehicle is no exception. Special Financing Available: APR AS LOW AS 3.9% OR REBATES AS HIGH AS $3,250! All the right ingredients!!! 4 Wheel Drive!!!4X4!!!4WD!!! How tempting are all the options on this Truck: Integrated Trailer Brake Controller, Trailering Equipment - Includes Heavy-Duty Rear Locking Differential Also Includes Includes trailer hitch, 7-pin and 4-pin connectors.... * Some Models maybe Priced after GM Owner loyalty(must own a 99 or newer GM Truck Vehicle to qualify) & GM trade assitance promgram(must trade a 99 or newer vehicle to qualify) Ask for more details Price is after all manufacture incentives and rebates We not only provide a great deal when it comes to price, but we also treat every customer with a great deal of respect!
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 for Sale
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 work truck 1wt(US $32,490.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 work truck(US $32,750.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 1lt(US $32,990.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 1lt(US $33,990.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 1lt(US $33,990.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 1lt(US $33,990.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
West County Auto Body Repair ★★★★★
Tower Motors ★★★★★
Tiny`s Repair Service & Fab ★★★★★
Springfield Transmission Inc ★★★★★
Santa Fe Glass Co Inc ★★★★★
Santa Fe Glass Co Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chevrolet Malibu gets across-the-board price cuts, hopes to dig out of slump
Mon, 11 Feb 2013To say that things aren't going well for the newly redesigned 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is a pretty sizable understatement. Reports have been swirling about the Malibu getting an emergency design refresh, less than a year after its introduction, as well as having its production at the Fairfax Assembly Plant halted twice already this year for excessive inventory. Now, Motor Trend is reporting that the midsize sedan will be receiving price drops across the board ranging from $300 on a number of models up to $770 on the 1LT trim; offsetting some of MSRP drop, though, the destination charge has increased from $760 to $810.
Without destination, the entry-level Malibu LS now starts at $21,995, which is still about $300 more than a Honda Accord and about $300 less than the segment's top-selling Toyota Camry. This new pricing also drops the price of the Eco, 2LT and 3LT trims by $300. The LTZ trim has dropped by $415, meaning that the Malibu's top dog now starts at just under $30,000, excluding destination.
Here are the new starting prices for all eight of the Malibu trim levels compared to the previous prices for the 2013 model year (including destination):
2018 Ford Expedition vs other big SUVs: How it compares on paper
Fri, Nov 10 2017With our Alex Kierstein rightly impressed in his first-drive review of the new 2018 Ford Expedition, we decided to dig a little deeper into the numbers, and we came up with the spreadsheet below to highlight how the new 2018 Expedition compares on paper to its main full-size SUV competitors: the 2018 Chevy Tahoe and Suburban (and therefore the 2018 GMC Yukon), 2018 Toyota Sequoia and 2018 Nissan Armada. We also threw in the new, even bigger 2018 Chevrolet Traverse since, as you'll see, its massive dimensions should put it on the radar for anyone who needs loads of passenger and cargo space but doesn't care as much about towing. A few notes about the chart above. First, the 6.2-liter V8 that's included with the new-for-2018 Tahoe RST trim level is the standard engine on the GMC Yukon Denali. You can apply most of the Tahoe's numbers to the entire Yukon and Yukon XL lineup. Second, though we highlighted categories where the Traverse led, we also highlighted the runner-up full-size SUV, since this was ultimately about that segment. Traverse numbers are broadly applicable to the new Buick Enclave. Related Video: Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan Toyota SUV Comparison consumer ford expedition gmc yukon chevy traverse toyota sequoia nissan armada chevrolet tahoe ford expedition max
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.