Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2009 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Lt Crew Cab Pickup 4-door 5.3l on 2040-cars

US $25,900.00
Year:2009 Mileage:42400 Color: Graystone Metallic /
 Black
Location:

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Crew Cab Pickup
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.3L 5328CC 325Cu. In. V8 FLEX OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:FLEX
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 3GCEK233X9G196958 Year: 2009
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 1500
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Trim: LT Crew Cab Pickup 4-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 42,400
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: Graystone Metallic
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

2009 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 4WD CREW CAB LT1
EXTERIOR: GRAYSTONE METALLIC, INTERIOR: EBONY CLOTH
VORTEC 5.3L V8 ENGINE 6-SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION W/ACTIVE FUEL MANAGEMENT
1-OWNER, NON-SMOKER, 42K MILES, VERY CLEAN
PWR SEAT DRIVER 6-WAY, AUTO DUAL ZONE A/C, STEERING WHEEL CONTROLS, BLUETOOTH
HEATED, PWR FOLD & ADJ, TURN SIGNAL OSRV MIRROR W/AUTO DIMMING
REMOTE VEHICLE STARTER SYSTEM
SPRAY-IN BEDLINER, TINTED WINDOWS
LOCKING TAILGATE
UNIVERSAL HOME REMOTE
HD TRAILERING EQUIPMENT PKG, LOCKING REAR DIFFERENTIAL
20" CHROME CLAD WHEELS
CHROME REAR BUMPER AND SURROUND GRILL
60/40 SPLIT REAR SEATING, UPLEVEL SPLIT BENCH SEATS W/DRVR LUMBAR & LOCKING STORAGE
AM/FM STEREO W/CD, XM SATELLITE RADIO
RETAIL OVER $28K, ASKING $25,900.


Vehicle still has existing 5 year / 100,000 engine / powertrain warranty from GM.

Auto Services in Oklahoma

World Auto Connection ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 7141 E 11th St, Catoosa
Phone: (918) 836-8444

Walker`s Auto Repair & Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Roadside Service, Automobile Salvage
Address: 2911 Grand Ave, Pocola
Phone: (479) 783-3736

W G Auto Collections ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1308 S Division St, Guthrie
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Sooner Muffler ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 7100 NW 10th St, Warr-Acres
Phone: (405) 787-0068

Simplified Repair Services ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: Foyil
Phone: (918) 260-3322

Pro-Tech Muffler ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 325 S Mill St, Locust-Grove
Phone: (918) 824-2555

Auto blog

2016 Chevy Volt zaps into the Detroit Auto Show with big improvements [w/video]

Mon, Jan 12 2015

If you need an example of how quickly the plug-in hybrid market is evolving, just take a quick glance at the 2016 Chevrolet Volt. For its freshly introduced new generation at the 2015 Detroit Auto Show, the sedan sports extra range, better efficiency and a host of other improvements to make the vehicle even easier to live with. A big portion of the model's improvements come from Chevy's second-gen Voltec propulsion system. The updated drive unit is 12 percent more efficient and sheds 100 pounds from the scales. The battery itself also drops 21 pounds, while growing in capacity to 18.3 kilowatt hours. It gives the Volt an electric range of up to 50 miles and offers a total driving distance of over 400 miles. In addition, the new 1.5-liter engine offers estimated 41 miles per gallon fuel economy (with no battery). The significant improvement in specs are certainly respectable, but the vast majority of buyers should notice the latest Volt's evolved styling first. Up front, there's a shiny new nose with a more modern take on Chevy's split grille. From there, the design slows back to a more svelte take rear with the original model's futuristic, square taillights not making the transition. Inside, Chevy simplifies the infotainment system and now offers seating for three in the back. Check it all out in the gallery, above, to see how far the latest model has come. Chevrolet Introduces All-New 2016 Volt New model features expressive, sleek design and delivers 50 miles of EV range DETROIT – Chevrolet today unveiled the all-new 2016 Volt electric car with extended range, showcasing a sleeker, sportier design that offers 50 miles of EV range, greater efficiency and stronger acceleration. The Volt's new, efficient propulsion system will offer a General Motors'-estimated total driving range of more than 400 miles and with regular charging, owners are expected to travel more than 1,000 miles on average between gas fill-ups. "The 2016 Chevrolet Volt provides our owners with a no-compromise electric driving experience," said Alan Batey, president of GM North America. "We believe our engineering prowess combined with data from thousands of customers allows us to deliver the most capable plug-in vehicle in the industry." The 2016 Chevrolet Volt's technology and range advancements are complemented by a design that blends sculpted, muscular proportions with aerodynamic efficiency, and an all-new interior with seating for five and improved functionality.

Buick takes top spot in 2022 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study

Tue, Jun 28 2022

People, economies, and supply chains weren't the only things continuing to get sick over the past year. The 2022 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) is out, showing the average rate of problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) during the first 90 days of ownership increased overall. The average figure for the 32 ranked manufacturers in 2020 was about 166 problems per 100 vehicles. In the 2021 IQS, that dropped to an average of 162. This year, the average jumps to 180 problems. J.D. Power says that figure is a record high over the 36-year history of the study. Buick leapt to the top of the rankings this year with the fewest issues, at 139 problems per 100 vehicles in the first 100 days of ownership. After Dodge became the first American automaker to lead the IQS in 2020, followed by Ram in 2021, this year marks a three-peat for U.S. carmakers. Dodge took second this year at 143 PP100, Chevrolet third with 147 PP100, Genesis the first luxury maker on the chart in fourth with 156 PP100. Between February and May, this year's study gathered responses to 223 questions from more than 84,000 new 2022-model-year car owners and lessees. The questions are designed to zero in on real-world problems new owners encounter with nine categories of vehicle features: Infotainment; features, controls and displays; exterior; driving assistance; interior; powertrain; seats; driving experience; and climate. As has been the case in the past few year, infotainment has proved to be the most problematic bugbear making scores worse. Considering features individually, six of 10 of the worst problem areas dealt with infotainment, causing infotainment's score of 45 PP100 to be 19.5 PP100 worse than the second-placed feature. Consumers ranked getting Android Auto and Apple CarPlay to connect reliably as the most troublesome.  GM didn't just score with Buick, which was one of only nine of the 33 ranked brands to show improvement this year. The conglomerate earned first place with the fewest PP100 among all the automaker groups, and scored the most model-level awards with nine, ahead of BMW with eight and Hyundai Group with three.  This year's study again showed a gap between luxury and mass-market makers, thought to be down to the amount of tech in luxury vehicles that consumers aren't properly informed about or that doesn't act as expected — that latter issue exacerbated by the chip shortage.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.