2002 Chevrolet Silverado on 2040-cars
Norman, Oklahoma, United States
This is a Used vehicle. Reliability Unknown. This vehicle will be sold AS IS – WHERE IS
This auction is for a 2002 Chevrolet Silverado Pick Up. The VIN is 1GCEC14V52Z254228. Engine is 4.8L V8 . Tire size is P235/75R16. This vehicle was started at the time of listing however, none of the components on this vehicle were tested. . AM/FM radio. Automatic transmission. A/C. Manual seats, locks and windows. Possible exhaust leak.
This vehicle will be sold AS-WHERE IS. This vehicle must be removed 7 days after auction ends. This vehicle will be sold AS IS- WHERE IS.
PLEASE READ BELOW
The mileage is 55342. The interior is fair condition. The condition of each is described to the best of our ability. Unless the auction description states differently, these items are sold "AS-IS" and "WHERE IS". Please understand that our warehouse does not have the equipment, facilities, or time to fully test every option listed. We supply all available Make/Model information for you to review and research. Please do your own research prior to bidding. Ask any questions that may affect your bid. By bidding on this equipment you release the seller and any of their associates from any liability resulting from misuse or damages caused by misuse of this equipment. We reserve the right to refuse sale or service for any reason. We will not ship. Any shipping costs or arrangements for transport are the buyer’s responsibility.
PAYMENT: Payment is due within 7 days of the closing of the auction. Otherwise, we reserve the right to re-post or re-sell this item. Payment upon pick up.
All items sold are AS IS – WHERE IS. Any statements or answers to questions do not in any way imply warranty of any type.
Valid U.S. Drivers License required Business Hours Mon thru Fri 8am-3:30pm Central Time Closed Saturday and Sunday |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 for Sale
2006 silverado "rsr"
Lt texas edition crew cab v8 5.3 leather bluetooth 20" running boards tow usb xm(US $26,988.00)
2003 chevrolet silverado 1500 z71(US $8,800.00)
We finance! 27256 miles 2010 chevrolet silverado 1500 hybrid 6l v8 16v onstar
1987 chevrolet short bed fleet side 4wd silverado 350 fuel injected chevy truck(US $3,300.00)
2008 chevy silverado 1500 crew z71 4x4 s/bed $599 ship(US $18,995.00)
Auto Services in Oklahoma
World Auto Connection ★★★★★
Walker`s Auto Repair & Towing ★★★★★
W G Auto Collections ★★★★★
Sooner Muffler ★★★★★
Simplified Repair Services ★★★★★
Pro-Tech Muffler ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chevy might've pulled out of NASCAR if it weren't for new Gen 6 car
Wed, 20 Feb 2013We've been on the fence with NASCAR for some time now. On one hand, it's some of the closest racing anywhere in motorsports, with actual passing and door-handle-to-door-handle action as a matter of course. But on the other, it's become template racing - a personality-driven sport more about the drivers than any sort of loyalty to a particular automaker. The Car Of Tomorrow format really rammed that message home, with a racecar's identity coming down to little more than headlamp stickers slapped on the nose. That's not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, but we've wondered for some time what's in it for the automakers, who pay big money to stay in a series that has had little increasingly little do with street car sales, let alone innovation.
Apparently General Motors was beginning to wonder the same thing. In a new ESPN report, Rick Hendrick, team owner of Hendrick Motorsports, suggests that GM would have seriously considered leaving NASCAR if it wasn't for the move away from the COT to the new Gen 6 racer. According to Hendrick, GM North America boss Mark Reuss spearheaded the charge away from the 2007 COT and toward a racecar with clearer automaker ties - cars like the new Chevrolet SS racer shown above. Learn more about the fight for a closer-to-production look in the ESPN story at the link.
Now, if we could just get more rear-wheel drive V8 coupes into showrooms....
GM's Oshawa plant may close after Camaro production moves
Sat, Feb 7 2015Most of the time, when vehicle production is moved from one assembly plant to another, it spells bad news for the former. While General Motors won't go so far as to say its Oshawa, Ontario factory, which is losing the Chevrolet Camaro to the Lansing Grand River plant, is in trouble, analysts seem to think the factory's days are numbered. Forecasts for the facility are far from positive. The loss of the Camaro this year, combined with GM's targeted shutdown of a single-shift assembly line responsible for the fleet-only Chevy Impala Limited and the Equinox crossover is a bad enough omen. But with AutoForecast Solutions CEO Joe McCabe telling The Detroit News that the plant's other two products, the Cadillac XTS and Buick Regal, aren't likely to stick around beyond 2017, things look decidedly grim at Oshawa. "There is a fairly strong chance that the plant could close," Jeff Schuster, senior VP of forecasting for LMC Automotive, told The Detroit News. That doesn't mean that Unifor, Canada's auto union, and the Canadian government are going to let the factory die without a fight. And with the latter chipping in $10 billion as part of GM's 2009 bailout, you might think it has a degree of leverage in the situation. A meeting between the government and the Detroit Three at the 2015 North American International Auto Show revealed that Oshawa is already a topic of conversation. "We made it very clear that we would like to see an indication on the future of Oshawa sooner, in particular because the timing is very challenging for our supply chain to be able to adjust to potentially future orders or changes, but also to know that there are going to be future opportunities at Oshawa," Ontario's Minister of Economic, Development, Employment and Infrastructure Brad Duguid told The Detroit News. "Bottom line: It's time they made a longer-term commitment here," Unifor President Jerry Dias said, echoing Duguid's statements. It's unclear if this sort of strong talk will be enough to save 3,300-plus employees, although based on the analysts' forecasts, we doubt it.
GM’s Charlie Wilson was right: Stronger regulations can help U.S. automakers
Fri, Oct 26 2018Charlie Wilson had been the president and CEO of General Motors before being nominated to become secretary of defense by Dwight Eisenhower. During his Senate confirmation hearings, he controversially said, "For years I thought what was good for our country was good for General Motors, and vice versa." And he was right. While car companies aren't necessarily the most progressive when it comes to things that might have the slightest possibility of political blowback, General Motors should be credited for doing something absolutely forthright in this regard with its announcement that it wants the federal U.S. government not to squash the California Air Resources Board's emissions requirements but to actually create a 50-state "National Zero Emissions Vehicle" program that, in the words of Mark Reuss, executive vice president and president, Global Product Group and Cadillac, "will drive the scale and infrastructure investments needed to allow the U.S. to lead the way to a zero emission future." Filing comments to the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks is one thing. But a graphic the company developed for this announcement — shown above — is something else entirely, something that is absolutely credible, creative and clever. There is a photo of a Chevrolet Bolt EV driving along a highway, which seems to be in Marin County (based on the blurred San Francisco skyline in the background). Text on the photo states: "It's Time for American Leadership in Zero Emissions Vehicles." It seems to say, in effect, "If we want to make America great again, then we're going to do it by leading in technology, not by retreating behind weakened regulations." General Motors understands that the auto market is globally competitive, and if U.S.-based companies are going to be in the game, then they'd better be able to out-innovate the companies based elsewhere, where emissions and economy standards are not being weakened. What's good for our country ... Related Video: