Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

All Electric Vehicle Warp9, 1khv Zilla, Lifepo4, Video, Excellent Cond.! on 2040-cars

US $9,000.00
Year:1987 Mileage:13850
Location:

Twin Falls, Idaho, United States

Twin Falls, Idaho, United States
Advertising:

Video of S10 EV and Components.
Video of S10 EV Acceleration.
Video of S10 Ev Recharge.

 All Electric S10!
 5 years ago I converted this 1987 Chevy S10 to an Electric Vehicle (EV).
I have driven it practically everyday to and from work and for local errands.
I want to make another EV and to do that I need to sell this one.
The truck is in excellent condition inside and out!
The trucks typical range is around 25+ miles Highway speeds and 50+ miles in stop and go traffic.
Top speed is near 70 MPH
The truck weighs exactly what it did when it had a gas engine!
On $3.76 (The price of 1 gallon of gas) the truck goes on Electricity for 126 Miles! (@ $.10/KW)
You will not find another S10 like this!
Since the initial conversion I have driven the truck for over 5 years and over 13,650 Miles.
The first 9000+ miles were on 29 golf cart batteries, which were replaced with 60 ea. 100 AH Lithium cells in March of this year.

The truck has the following components, all of which are top of the line EV Components!
60ea. 100 Amp Hour, HiPower Lithium Iron Phosphate Cells, LiFePo4
Ligoo Battery management System, with 7 inch touch screen display.
Motor, Net Gain, WarP 9 Series Wound DC Motor
Controller, Zilla, Z1K-HV-P, Hairball 2 Interface,1000 Max Motor Amps, 72 to 300 Battery Volts
Throttle Control, Hall Effect Petal Input (HEPI)
Battery Charger, Manzanita Micro, PFC20B, Input 60 to 250 Volts AC, Output: 12 to 360 Volts DC @ 30 Amps
Clutchless Conversion, stock 4 speed transmission.
1000 Watt Home Theater Sound System
Too Much more to list!!
I have over $28,000 invested in building this S10! The Lithium battery pack alone was over $9000

For all of the conversion steps go to:
waynesev.com
If your serious about getting an AFFORDABLE Electric Vehicle here is your chance!

Auto Services in Idaho

Windshield Rescue Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Windshield Repair
Address: 295 S Holmes Ave, Rigby
Phone: (866) 290-4620

Union Gospel Mission Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 7219 E Sprague Ave, Hauser
Phone: (509) 327-4357

S & D Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 139 Blue Lakes Blvd S, Filer
Phone: (208) 734-2267

Oakley-Moody Svc Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 1375 W Grove St, Eagle
Phone: (208) 343-4697

Meridian Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 505 N Main St, Meridian
Phone: (208) 888-3797

John`s 24/7 Towing & Recovery LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: 64 Old Crouch Rd, Pioneerville
Phone: (208) 462-2833

Auto blog

Weekly Recap: Chevy and Alfa plot comeback strategies

Sat, Jun 27 2015

Chevrolet and Alfa Romeo were two of the 20th Century's most iconic automotive brands. Chevy embodied America's post-war power and confidence. Alfa was the definition of the stylish Italian sports car. They reached halcyon heights in the 1950s and '60s, before declining precipitously amid new competition, changing consumer tastes, and uneven corporate management. Both say 2015 is the start of something better, and this week Chevy and Alfa laid out ambitious plans and showcased new cars that they hope will make them more relevant this year, and in the coming years. Each brand sits at its own crossroads, and their paths forward are as different as the Chevy Cruze and the Alfa Romeo Giulia. Chevy is still a sales beast, as evidenced by its volume of 4.8 million vehicles sold around the world last year. Chevy executives are fond of saying one of their cars is sold every seven seconds, which illustrates the strength and reach of a car brand that is the fourth largest in the world. "Make no mistake about it, we are a brand for the people," said General Motors North America president Alan Batey. But he wants consumers to want to buy a Chevy for its design and technology, not simply because it's affordable. That starts with all Chevys now featuring a distinctive a family look, with sporty cues from the Corvette or strong lines that riff on the Silverado pickup. "We want people to fall in lust with our cars," said Mike Pevovar, executive design director for Chevy passenger cars. "That initial emotional attraction has to be right on the exterior, and that's where form comes into play." Chevy is also loading up its cars, like the freshly unveiled 2016 Chevy Cruze, with technology to appeal to a younger crowd that prizes connectivity. The Cruze will offer Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with its MyLink infotainment system, and OnStar with 4G LTE and wifi. Seeking out younger buyers is also sound business practice: Millennials now outnumber Baby Boomers as the largest single age group in the United States. Younger buyers also can improve a brand's image, which is another area where Chevy would like to improve. Chevy ranks 82nd on Interbrand's Best Global Brand's list, behind 11 other automakers. Apple is No. 1. "We need our own variation of the Genius Bar," Batey said. 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia View 3 Photos Meanwhile, Alfa is in different shape.

Chevy Volt 'acceptable,' Nissan Leaf 'poor' in new IIHS safety tests

Thu, Jul 31 2014

Ford C-Max Hybrid also scored "acceptable" rating. With US Nissan Leaf sales up almost 30 percent during the first half of the year, the only thing that might be able to stop the battery-electric vehicle is a good, stiff barrier. Unfortunately, thing's aren't always pretty when that happens in the real world, according to new tests from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Things with the Chevrolet Volt extended-range plug-in are a little bit rosier, though. The two plug-in vehicles were part of a batch of a dozen vehicles that just went through the IIHS's "small overlap" test, in which the driver's side front corner of the vehicle is crashed into a rigid barrier at 40 miles per hour. Out of the dozen, only the Mini Cooper Countryman was given a "good" rating. Five vehicles, including the Volt and the Ford C-Max Hybrid, were rated "acceptable," two were "marginal" and two, including the Leaf, were "poor." Plug-in vehicles are unique in the crash-test context because of their relatively large battery sizes. In the Volt's case, the driver had a "low risk" of injury, said the IIHS. But the Leaf's crash substantially pushed back the instrument panel and steering column, creating a scenario where the driver was "likely" to sustain leg injuries. The batteries in both the Leaf and the Volt passed safety tests specifically targeted at things like thermo and electrical properties and overall integrity. "Nissan is proud of the Leaf's 'Good' rating in all other IIHS tests, a 4-star NCAP rating from NHTSA and its IIHS Top Safety Pick rating in all previous years since the car's release," the company said in an e-mail sent to AutoblogGreen. "As for the performance of the 2014 Leaf in the 'small overlap frontal test,' Nissan will continue to review these and other results from the IIHS 'small overlap frontal test' as we seek opportunities for improvement." Check out the IIHS's press release and small car crash-test video footage below. Range of ratings: Small car ratings run the gamut in challenging small overlap front test The Mini Cooper Countryman is the only small car to earn a good rating among the latest group of 12 cars subjected to the Institute's small overlap front crash test. Two electric models and a hybrid also are in the mix, with varied results. The electric-powered Chevrolet Volt (with a gasoline engine "range extender") earns an acceptable rating, while its battery-electric rival, the Nissan Leaf, earns a poor rating.

UAW rejects GM contract proposal but makes a counter offer

Tue, Oct 1 2019

The United Auto Workers union said a new comprehensive offer made by General Motors Co late Monday to end a two-week-old strike was not acceptable and said it had made a new counterproposal. UAW vice president Terry Dittes said in a letter to members "there are many important issues that remain unresolved." The union is awaiting GM's next proposal. He said GM's offer came up short on many issues.  Dittes said GM made a "comprehensive proposal" at 9:40 p.m. Monday. "This proposal that the company provided to us on day 15 of the strike did not satisfy your contract demands or needs. There were many areas that came up short like health care, wages, temporary employees, skilled trades and job security to name a few." Dittes is the union's vice president for GM relations and the UAW's lead negotiator in these contract talks. "We have responded today with a counterproposal and are awaiting GM's next proposal to the union," he wrote. "Regardless of what is publicized in print or social media, etc., there are still many important issues that remain unresolved." The strike, in its third week, has cost GM more than $1 billion, according to J.P. Morgan analyst Ryan Brickman. He said the cost per day in potential profit is $82 million. However, another analysis, by East Lansing-based consultant Anderson Economic Group, put the losses at $25 million a day. And the effects of the strike are expanding. GM said Tuesday the strike has created a parts shortage that forced the automaker to halt production at its pickup and transmission plants in Silao, Mexico, temporarily laying off 6,000 workers. Silao is where GM builds its highly profitable four-door crew cab Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups. The strike has also forced GM to idle some Canadian workers, and many suppliers have been forced to halt operations. About 48,000 UAW members went on strike on Sept. 16 seeking higher pay, greater job security, a bigger share of the leading U.S. automaker’s profit and protection of their healthcare.Â