1999 Chevrolet S10 Ls Standard Cab Pickup 2-door 4.3l on 2040-cars
Warner, South Dakota, United States
Engine:4.3L 262Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Standard Cab Pickup
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Mileage: 99,975
Make: Chevrolet
Exterior Color: Black
Model: S10
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: LS Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Cylinders: 6
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control
Bidding on a 1999 Chevy S10 Pickup, this truck has been in my family for over 10 years. Runs and drives great and is very clean. Truck comes with Xenon ground effects package, 19" Mondera Wheels, wide low-profile tires, new windshield, new radiator. Truck also has an underneath neon lighting system installed but needs 3 light bulbs to finish the package. It has a few minor door dings and one small ding on the tailgate. Mechanically sound and would have no qualms about jumping in and driving across the country. Great truck and fun to drive, just have too many toys and can't keep them all.
Chevrolet S-10 for Sale
- 2000 chevrolet s10 xtreme standard cab pickup 2-door 2.2l
- We finance 2001 chevrolet s-10 crew cab ls 4wd clean carfax pwrwndws/mrrs cd a/c(US $5,500.00)
- 2002 chevrolet s10 long bed ~ 1 owner ~ only 70,870 original miles!! very nice!!
- 2003 chevrolet s10 base extended cab pickup 3-door 4.3l
- 2003 chevrolet 4x4 - s10 - zr2 - ls extended cab - 3 door truck - nice.. clean..(US $7,995.00)
- 1984 chevrolet show truck
Auto Services in South Dakota
Tint Masters ★★★★★
Dales A-1 Transmission Service ★★★★★
Advance Auto Parts Sioux Falls ★★★★★
Bob`s Lock & Key ★★★★
Tony`s Collision Center ★★★★
Hedahls Parts Plus ★★★★
Auto blog
Question of the Day: Worst year of the Malaise Era?
Thu, Jun 23 2016The Malaise Era for cars in the United States spanned the 1973 through 1983 model years, and featured such abominations as a Corvette with just 205 horsepower (from the optional engine!) and MGBs with suspensions jacked way up to meet new headlight-height requirements. There were many low points throughout this gloomy period, of course. The horrifyingly low power and fuel-economy numbers for big V8s during the middle years of the Malaise Era make a strong case for 1974 or 1975— the years of Nixon's resignation and the Fall of Saigon, respectively— as the most Malaisey years. But then the GM-pummeling debacles of the Chevy Citation and Cadillac Cimarron could make an early-1980s year the low point. 1979, the year of the ignominious Chrysler bailout? You choose! Related Video:
2015 Chevy Volt gets larger battery, though range remains the same
Sat, Jul 19 2014The Chevrolet Volt isn't changing much for the 2015 model year. According to specifications uncovered by Inside EVs, though, the new Volt's battery does have a slightly larger capacity. According to the spec sheet, this doesn't translate to increased range. Real world driving, though, might tell a different story. The 2015 Volt's battery storage is slightly higher than the outgoing model's, up from 16.5 kilowatt-hours to 17.1 kWh. According to GM's manager of electrification technology communications, Kevin Kelly, speaking to Green Car Reports, the increased capacity is "a late change done in the cell... just another continuous improvement to surprise and delight our customers." The stated electric range, however, stays at 38 miles. Inside EVs followed up on its original report, and found that drivers could see some advantage to the battery tweak. When they spoke to Kelly, he told them, "As a result of this change, we would expect that some customers may see a slight improvement in overall EV range." It's worth noting that when battery capacity increased from 16 kWh to 16.5 kWh for the 2013 Volt, electric range increased by three miles to the current 38, while MPGe went from 94 to 98. The price of the 2015 Chevrolet Volt remains steady, at $34,995. The actual cost to the customer is considerably less with the $7,500 federal tax credit, as well as any local incentives.
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.