Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1957 Chevrolet Truck 3100, Big Window, 1955 1957 1958 1959 on 2040-cars

US $19,500.00
Year:1957 Mileage:999999 Color: Burgundy /
 Burgundy
Location:

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Advertising:
Engine:3.8L 3852CC 235Cu. In. l6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Transmission:3 Speed
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
Body Type:Standard Cab Pickup
Fuel Type:GAS
Condition:

Used

Year
: 1957
Mileage: 999,999
Make: Chevrolet
Sub Model: Deluxe Cab
Model: Other Pickups
Exterior Color: Burgundy
Trim: 3100 Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Interior Color: Burgundy
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Cylinders: 6
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty

1957 Chevrolet Pickup Truck
Short-Bed

I have a 1957 Chevy truck up for sale.  It's really a great truck and is in very good shape.  It has a nice original look to it.  It also has the factory big back window which is pretty rare.   It was a NM truck for a long time before coming to AZ.  It is very solid and no cancer upon my inspection. The paint is in good shape and would rate it 8/10.  It might have a few tiny scratches up close here and there, but from 5' away the truck looks amazing and is fun to cruise around in.  It has a low reserve and buy in now.  It's priced right and will be a great truck for someone to own.  Here is what is known about the truck.

  • 6cyl Engine checked out my a certified mechanic and it runs good
  • 3 on the tree manual transmission and the clutch and gears preform as they should
  • Brakes and fuel systems inspected and work correctly.
  • Exterior lights work
  • New interior carpet
  • New wheels and tires with caps and rings
  • Chassis steam cleaned
  • New front glass gasket
  • All glass is good and no cracks
  • Door seals are newer and seal
  • Has seat belts
  • New fuel tank and sending unit

The gauges work with exception of the speedo.  It needs a new cable.  All the other gauges appear to work.  The wood bed is still in decent shape.  It might need another coat of clear, but it is not rotten.  It has a later model bench seat as well.  This is a very good truck and for the price it's one to not miss.  I have tried to explain things as accurate as possible.  Please, if you have any questions, call me an I am happy to answer them.  Jason 480-619-8353   The truck is in Gilbert, AZ  
If you need help with shipping, I can recommend a good shipping company.  Good luck and bid with confidence.  

Auto Services in Arizona

V I Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 701 W Bethany Home Rd, Glendale-Luke-Afb
Phone: (602) 841-4394

TIC Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Air Conditioning Service & Repair, Emission Repair-Automobile & Truck
Address: 5310 E Northgate Loop Suite D, Flagstaff
Phone: (928) 526-0966

Suiter`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 11049 N 23rd Ave Ste B1, Glendale-Luke-Afb
Phone: (602) 943-6225

Sav-On Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: 3701 N 43rd Ave, Luke-Afb
Phone: (602) 272-1605

Ronnie`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 527 W University Dr, Guadalupe
Phone: (480) 967-8869

Red`s Collision Service ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 22039 N 24th Ave, Youngtown
Phone: (623) 869-0813

Auto blog

Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?

Sat, Sep 23 2017

If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd

Chevy, Lincoln dealers say they still want sedans

Mon, Feb 17 2020

Detroit automakers have famously turned their backs on sedans as they make the strategic bet to double down on money-making trucks and SUVs, but dealers for at least two American brands are giving the companies contrary signals. In separate recent interviews with leading national dealer councils for Chevrolet and Lincoln, Automotive News reports that both brands’ dealers still see a need for cars. The publication published a Q&A interview with Mike Bowsher, chairman of the Chevrolet National Dealer Council, who said Chevy dealers managed to hold onto market share last year despite the phase-out of the Cruze compact sedan and hatchback, thanks to products like the Spark and Sonic subcompacts and the Trax and Equinox crossovers. But, he acknowledged, “We do feel like we could use a car, especially in the low-MSRP range.” The comments follow similar recent comments from Tom Lynch, who chairs the Lincoln National Dealer Council. He told AN, “If weÂ’re not in segments where there is still a good amount of business, I think the company and the dealers lose out.” The Cruze was one of the victims of GMÂ’s November 2018 announcement of plant closures, with production having ceased with the closure of GMÂ’s Lordstown, Ohio assembly plant last year. GM sold 47,975 Cruzes in 2019 but a healthy 142,617 in 2018. At Lincoln, Lynch said the council has been telling the company it needs to stick with the sedan segment, despite plans to kill the MKZ sedan in the coming months and unconfirmed reports that the Continental isnÂ’t long for this world, either, despite the buzz of the suicide-door Coach Door Edition, shown in the photo above. Lincoln sold 17,725 MKZs and 6,586 Continental sedans in 2019, down a combined 15%, but still good for almost 22% of overall Lincoln sales. It's worth noting that Lincoln competes in a luxury segment that still expresses allegiance to four- and two-door cars. Even Cadillac, its cross-town rival, is staying active with the upcoming CT5 and CT4 sedans. Lynch pointed to Tesla as evidence that strong sedan products can resonate with consumers, though he conceded that “What that looks like for Lincoln going forward, IÂ’m not sure of.” For now, anyway, Chevy still offers the Sonic and Spark subcompacts, the latter of which saw sales climb 32.5% in 2019 to 31,281 (Sonic sales fell nearly as steeply).

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer