1967 Chevrolet Nova Ss on 2040-cars
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Feel free to ask me any questions about the car : lavonnalsstoltzman@clubsubaru.com .
Documented 1967 Chevy Nova Factory SS Car
No Expense Sparred 500 + HP - Well Detailed Pro Touring Beauty!
Highlights:
406 cubic inch V8 with electronic fuel injection Stock 400 C12 bolt block
4L801E 4-speed automatic transmission
Customized interior
Upgraded suspension
Rack-and-pinion steering
13" C6 corvette brakes
Sale includes complete build sheet docs, receipts and information
American Torque Thrust 'M' Racing Chrome Wheels
DTS 12-bolt rear axle with Richmond 4:11 gear
Detailed Specifications:
Documented Factory SS New Mexico Desert Car, 117 SS VIN. Protect-O-Plate, totally disassembled, media blasted and
primed with zinc chromate
primer. PPG two part primer an PPG Concepts single stage Black Urethane paint. The body was fully disassembled and
painted in pieces, then
reassembled and wheeled.
The Rear of The Car
is tastefully mini-tubbed with 14" between the steel so to the untrained eye it appears stock, even inside the
trunk. The rear frame rails are moved inboard,
fully boxed and hand built from 12 gauge steel. The boxed full frame runs all the way to the sub-frame mounts at
the firewall and is tied to the seat frame supports. The rear axle is a new DTS 12 bolt with Richmond 4:11 gear.
Torsion center section, 33 spline Mosher axles with large Ford style bearings that are drilled for Chevy,Ford and
Mopar wheels. Powder coated Mosher differential cover. Rear brakes are stock 12" C6 Corvette brakes. Finishing out
with a 4 link set-up, rear sway bar, large pan hard rod and QA1 12 way adjustable aluminum coil over shocks. Rear
is built to handle in excess of 700 HP.
The Front of the car
has a TCI Mustang II Chassis shimmed square to the body with 6-way adjustable coil over shocks, fast ratio T-Bird
power rack and pinion steering, 13" C6 Corvette brakes, stock rebuilt collapsible steering column, and
anti-vibration collapsible Borgenson steering shaft.
The Engine
is an internally balanced 406 CI small block Chevy with electronic fuel injection that easily makes in excess of
500 HP and 500 ft/lbs. of Torque.
Chevrolet Nova for Sale
- 1967 chevrolet nova(US $22,700.00)
- 1971 chevrolet nova(US $16,300.00)
- 1971 chevrolet nova(US $17,300.00)
- 1966 chevrolet nova chevy ii(US $12,100.00)
- 1967 chevrolet nova chevy ii pro touring on bags(US $13,200.00)
- 1962 chevrolet nova(US $15,900.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
Wise Auto Repair ★★★★★
Wicke Auto Service & Body Co ★★★★★
Vincel Infiniti ★★★★★
Union Tires & Wheels ★★★★★
Truck Centers Inc ★★★★★
Tri -Star Imports ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chevy Corvette gets Valet Mode with Performance Data Recorder [w/video]
Mon, 18 Aug 2014For the 2015-model-year, Chevrolet introduces Valet Mode for the Corvette, an enhancement to the Performance Data Recorder (PDR) already available and to your peace of mind. The PDR already captures 720p HD video with a windshield-mounted camera, records interior audio with a cabin microphone and gathers telemetry data using GPS, saving the data to an SD card in the glovebox. You can then watch your track-day antics with various information overlays on the center console screen.
Valet Mode will let you hit 'Replay' when your car gets pulled up front smelling vaguely of fricasseed clutch. Turned on by entering a four-digit code, it also locks the interior storage spaces and turns off the infotainment system. It can't be turned off until the code is re-entered. There's a press release below with more information as well as a video that explains how it works, with the obligatory dig at the 'Vette's biggest foe.
Cadillac could base its entry-level sedan on the Chevy Cruze [UPDATE]
Wed, Apr 27 2016UPDATE: Cadillac spokesperson Donny Nordlicht tells Autoblog , "The post speculating on a future Cadillac model derived from the Chevrolet Cruze is completely false." Premium automakers Mercedes-Benz and Audi have seen plenty of success with new small front-drive-based sedans. The CLA-Class had its best January ever this year, while Audi moved more of its new A3 in 2015 than its predecessor sold in 2005 through 2010 combined. The fact that Cadillac wants a piece of that pie is no surprise, then. There's a new rumor that GM's luxury brand could launch its own compact – possibly called CT2 – to battle the Germans. Cadillac, a brand that's pushed hard to rebuild its rear-drive reputation, could develop a new entry-level model based on the front-wheel-drive 2016 Chevrolet Cruze's D2XX platform. Go ahead and make your Cimarron jokes. Sources are telling GM Inside News that a Cadillac built on the Delta platform would ditch the Cruze's turbocharged 1.4-liter four-cylinder for a 1.5-liter turbo in base models. General Motors' well received 2.0-liter turbo four would serve in higher-end models. According to GMIN, the Delta-based Cadillac would likely command a $6,000 to $9,000 premium over the Cruze, so figure $23,000 to $26,000 on the low end to $30,000 to $33,000 for something at the top of the range. As much as we dislike the kind of badge engineering that brought us the Cavalier-based Cadillac Cimarron in the '80s, the company has done an admirable job of distinguishing vehicles on shared platforms lately. A Delta-platform Cadillac would at least have a good basis – the new Cruze is surprisingly comfy. That said, we question GM's rationale if this rumor is indeed true. Put simply, Cadillac needs another sedan like I need another student loan payment. The company has four sedans, three of which overlap two segments, and none of which are selling very well. That's not because they're bad, but because customers want crossovers, of which Caddy has but one – the new XT5. Spending the time and money to add a fifth sedan to the mix when the company desperately needs to flesh out its CUV range would be a tremendous mistake. As much as we hate to say it, if Cadillac really wants to add a small, entry-level car to its range, it'd better be a crossover. Related Video:
IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving
Tue, Oct 11 2022WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.