Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2012 Chevrolet Malibu Ls on 2040-cars

US $13,995.00
Year:2012 Mileage:40164 Color: Silver Ice Metallic /
 Titanium
Location:

1845 N State St, North Vernon, Indiana, United States

1845 N State St, North Vernon, Indiana, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:2.4L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1G1ZB5E02CF245139
Stock Num: P3331
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Malibu LS
Year: 2012
Exterior Color: Silver Ice Metallic
Interior Color: Titanium
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Audio system security
  • Black grille w/chrome surround
  • Braking Assist
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with cov
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Daytime running lights
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Dual vanity mirrors
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Four-wheel Independent Suspension
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 16.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 22 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 33 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Independent rear suspension
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 8.8 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 15 cu.ft.
  • Metal-look dash trim
  • Metal-look door trim
  • MP3 player
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • OnStar Directions & Connections
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power remote trunk release
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear bench
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote power door locks
  • Side airbag
  • SiriusXM AM/FM/Satellite Radio
  • SiriusXM Satellite Radio(TM)
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Stability control
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System: Tire specific
  • Total Number of Speakers: 6
  • Trip computer
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Urethane steering wheel trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Diameter: 17
  • Wheel Width: 7
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 40164

NO GAMES, NO GIMMICKS, NO HIDDEN FEES, STRAIGHT FORWARD TO THE POINT AND NO DOC FEES. DRIVE A LITTLE TO SAVE A LOT.

Auto Services in Indiana

western metals ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automobile Salvage
Address: 10231 mckinley, Osceola
Phone: (574) 310-2274

Webb Ford Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 9809 Indianapolis Blvd, Highland
Phone: (219) 924-3400

Weatherford Auto & Truck Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 515 Meridian St, Oakville
Phone: (765) 643-0554

Watson Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2044 Laurel St, Mooresville
Phone: (317) 838-8888

Wagner`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 7820 W Washington St, Danville
Phone: (317) 244-9672

Tom O`Brien Chrysler Jeep Dodge -Greenwood ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 750 US Highway 31 N, Wanamaker
Phone: (317) 881-6791

Auto blog

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.

Chevy Camaro is a good sport, wishes Ford Mustang Happy 50th

Tue, 15 Apr 2014

It was 1966 when Chevrolet launched its challenger to the wildly successful Ford Mustang, the Camaro. While the competition between the two brands was already healthy, the arrival of the Camaro set off one of the most intense, model-to-model rivalries in the industry.
That competitive spirit hasn't stopped Chevy and the Camaro from wishing Ford's iconic muscle car a Happy 50th Birthday as the Ford's April 17 anniversary rolls around. These two cars have been linked over the years, and while the rivalry took a break for a few years in the 2000s, today's competition between the Camaro and Mustang is as fierce as it's ever been.
You might recall that this friendliness when it comes to major milestones isn't too rare. Ford put on quite a display for General Motors' hundredth anniversary back in 2008. As the Camaro's fiftieth birthday approaches in 2016, we wouldn't be surprised to see the Mustang sending its best wishes to its Bowtie rival.

2014 Corvette Stingray meets Tesla Model S in drag strip showdown

Wed, Jan 29 2014

They come from two different worlds and have little in common. The Tesla Model S P85 is the sportiest version of this paradigm-punching sedan from California, while the 2014 Corvette Stingray Z51 is a performance-enhanced version of Michigan's recently-updated sports car stalwart. The West Coast car seats five adults and eats electrons like Popeye eats spinach, the Easterner has two passenger places and, surprisingly, sips gasoline like one might bourbon. An attribute they do happen to share is extreme quickness. This similarity is all the excuse Drag Times needed to set the vehicles beside each other at the Palm Beach International Raceway for a bit of mano-a-mano quarter-mile combat. Fortunately enough, cameras were rolling for each of two bouts down the blacktop and the results recorded for our edification and enlightenment. The winner? We won't spoil it for you, but let's just say it's really, really close. How close? Scroll below and watch the video for yourself. Just be warned, the results may surprise you. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.