1960 Chevrolet Impala Convertible For Parts Or To Restore on 2040-cars
Newport, Vermont, United States
Engine:NONE
Vehicle Title:Salvage
Mileage: 0
Make: Chevrolet
Exterior Color: Gray
Model: Impala
Trim: CONVERTIBLE
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: N0 TRANSMISSION
Options: Convertible
THIS IS A 1960 CONVERTIBLE FOR PARTS OR TO RESTORE. I HAVE OVER $10,000 INVESTED .PROJECT IS NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART.
RESTORATION WAS STARTED ,CAR HAS NEW TRUNK FLOOR PANS,FLOOR REPAIR PANELS,FULL FRONT FLOOR PAN-1 PIECE
ALL NEW FROM ECKLERS OVER 5 YEARS AGO,WITH OTHER FLOOR BRACES ETC. HAS ALL PARTS AND PIECES TO PUT BACK TOGETHER MINUS ENGINE AND TRANSMISSION.
ALSO COMES WITH ANOTHER PERFECT SOUTHER FRAME WITH ONLY SURFACE RUST,FRAMES IN EXC.SHAPE
NO TITLE,BILL OF SALE ONLY. NO TITLE IN VERMONT REQUIRED IF OVER 15 YEARS
ALSO HAVE A COMPLETE RUNNING 348 ENGINE WITH FLYWHEEL,CLUTCH,BELL HOUSING -COMPLETE FROM CARB TO OIL PAN
MOTOR IS FOR SALE FOR ADDITIONAL $3500.
Chevrolet Impala for Sale
- 9 passenger wagon originally texas from texas factory air barn fresh project car(US $2,550.00)
- 1963 chevrolet impala restoration project
- 2007 chevy impala police 9c1 black 75k(US $6,050.00)
- 1963 chevrolet impala convertible 283 v8 powerglide transmission tach(US $19,999.00)
- Frame off restored impala convertible 348 tri-power a/c(US $149,900.00)
- 2006 chevrolet impala ltz sedan 4-door 3.9l(US $17,000.00)
Auto Services in Vermont
Mark`s Auto ★★★★★
Yipes Auto Accessories and Graphics ★★★★
Tire Warehouse ★★★★
Lyons Gary Garage ★★★★
Houle`s Used Auto & Repairs ★★★★
Paya`s Auto ★
Auto blog
This 450-hp electric Lotus Evora is powered by Tesla and Chevrolet
Tue, May 9 2017When someone mentions an electric Lotus, the first thing that comes to mind is the Tesla Roadster, the California-based automaker's first vehicle. That car started life as an Elise before being heavily massaged and adapted by Tesla's engineers. In a similar spirit, the people at Onpoint Dyno are close to finishing Blue Lightning, a track-ready all-electric Lotus Evora. Blue Lightning uses a Tesla drive unit and a Chevrolet Volt battery pack, both mounted in the middle in place of the Evora's 3.5-liter Toyota V6. It's putting down about 450 horsepower at the wheels. The car was built for time attack sessions, so power is fed through custom forged wheels and super sticky Pirelli PZero Trofeo R tires, the same ones found on the last Chevrolet Camaro Z/28. There is a custom digital instrument cluster in place of the Lotus gauges. There's also a regen paddle on the left side of the steering wheel. With a full charge, Blue Lighting should go about 120 miles. While the car runs under its own power, it's only about 90 percent complete. It has no power steering, no firewall in between the seats and the motor and battery pack, no A/C, and a large hole where the shift lever used to be. Other final touches include fine-tuning the brakes and suspension. There is also a custom rear bumper coming that should make it look more like the new Lotus Evora 400. Onpoint Dyno expects the car to hit the track in the next month or so. Related Video:
Race Recap: 2013 Twelve Hours of Sebring, cakewalk up front, grindfest out back [w/spoilers]
Tue, 19 Mar 2013This year's 12 Hours of Sebring wasn't exactly a foregone conclusion because we're still talking about racing, and anything can happen when the speeds are as high as the adrenaline and the desire. But we're still talking about Audi bringing it's two top-spec racers - and its huge budget and its nearly neurotic attention to detail - to a race that it uses as a test bed for The 24 Hours of Le Mans and as a way to open the endurance racing season with a victory.
Besides, 12 hours is a long time, especially at Sebring, and things didn't go all Audi's way. On top of that, although it was a pretty quiet race, behind the Audis things got even grimier, with plenty of battles, plenty of mechanical issues, and the new BMW Z4 GTE and Viper GTS-R being race tested. Oh, and that brand new chromed-out DeltaWing...
IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving
Tue, Oct 11 2022WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.