1999 Chevrolet 2500 Express Van on 2040-cars
Hudson, Wisconsin, United States
Body Type:Minivan, Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.7
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1999
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Express
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Not Applicable
Trim: 2500 express
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Drive Type: rwd
Mileage: 136,500
Exterior Color: White
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
1999 Chevrolet 2500 Express Cargo Van Van runs and drives really well. Some rust and dings,tires are fair,good runner. You wont find a better van for the price.
|
Chevrolet Express for Sale
- 2006 chevrolet express cargo van 2500 135" wb w/partition, shelving, and racks!!(US $8,500.00)
- 2003 chevy express box truck(US $5,000.00)
- 1997 chevrolet express 1500 base standard conversion van 3-door 4.3l
- 2003 chevrolet regency van
- 1999 chevy g1500 conversion van high top, great condition!! new transmission!!!
- Chevrolet express 1500 gladiator conversion van handicap wheelchair lift hi-top(US $3,850.00)
Auto Services in Wisconsin
Zinecker`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Wilson Collision Center ★★★★★
Van Linn`s ★★★★★
Tuff Enuff Auto Body ★★★★★
Scotts Automotive Pewaukee ★★★★★
Schok`s Autobody ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Corvette Stingray meets Tesla Model S in drag strip showdown
Wed, Jan 29 2014They come from two different worlds and have little in common. The Tesla Model S P85 is the sportiest version of this paradigm-punching sedan from California, while the 2014 Corvette Stingray Z51 is a performance-enhanced version of Michigan's recently-updated sports car stalwart. The West Coast car seats five adults and eats electrons like Popeye eats spinach, the Easterner has two passenger places and, surprisingly, sips gasoline like one might bourbon. An attribute they do happen to share is extreme quickness. This similarity is all the excuse Drag Times needed to set the vehicles beside each other at the Palm Beach International Raceway for a bit of mano-a-mano quarter-mile combat. Fortunately enough, cameras were rolling for each of two bouts down the blacktop and the results recorded for our edification and enlightenment. The winner? We won't spoil it for you, but let's just say it's really, really close. How close? Scroll below and watch the video for yourself. Just be warned, the results may surprise you. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.
Watch the National Corvette Museum sinkhole being filled in by R/C cars
Sun, Jan 11 2015Okay, so not exactly cars, but Bobcats - but still quite cool. You might remember that the National Corvette Museum had that little divot that needed to be filled in. Turns out the construction firm of Scott, Murphy & Daniel doing the work is using two remote-controlled Bobcats to fill the sinkhole with "manufactured sand," which in this case is crushed limestone. It appears that the Bobcat company has offered remote operation since at least 2007 via a wireless transmitter that works up to 1,500 feet away. So yes, that means two SMD employees stand on the edge of the pit and flick joystick levers for hours at a time, one in charge of a Bobcat with a roller-compactor attachment, the other in charge of a Bobcat with a bucket. And that, to us, is a pretty good way to earn the daily bread. Check out the video above for the latest sinkhole update. News Source: National Corvette Museum via YouTube Auto News Weird Car News Chevrolet GM Videos rc car remote control National Corvette Museum bobcat ncm
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.046 s, 7807 u