Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1998 Chevrolet Express 1500 Cargo on 2040-cars

US $7,995.00
Year:1998 Mileage:125525 Color: Tan /
 Tan
Location:

2849 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Sanford, North Carolina, United States

2849 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Sanford, North Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:5.7L V8 16V MPFI OHV
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GBFG15R3W1104296
Stock Num: 105622
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Express 1500 Cargo
Year: 1998
Exterior Color: Tan
Interior Color: Tan
Options:
  • 3 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Cargo area light
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Daytime running lights
  • Diameter of tires: 15.0"
  • Fixed antenna
  • Front Head Room: 40.6"
  • Front Hip Room: 63.9"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.2"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.8"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Fuel Capacity: 31.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Manual driver mirror adjustment
  • Manual passenger mirror adjustment
  • Max cargo capacity: 267 cu.ft.
  • Overall Length: 218.8"
  • Overall Width: 79.2"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/vinyl steering wheel trim
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear door type: Split swing-out
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Split swing-out
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Silver styled steel rims
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Profile: 75
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
  • Wheelbase: 135.0"
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 3 Doors
Mileage: 125525

1998 CHEVROLET G10 SPORTS VAN WITH 2 PREVIOUS OWNER, NO ACCIDENT HISTORY, REAR DVD, REAR BUCKET SEATS, AM FM CD PLAYER, ALLOY WHEELS, AND POWER EVERYTHING!!! Hablamos Espaol!!Come test drive today! Please call 866-455-1157.Optional warranties offered.FREE CARFAX on ALL VEHICLES!! Apply for financing on our website, www.JTAUTOMART.comWE GIVE MILITARY DISCOUNTS!! Transportation and delivery services available. FREE SHUTTLE on a 50-mile radius! We accept Visa, MasterCard, Certified Check, and Bank Transfer for your convenience.Call, Click, or Stop by today!

Auto Services in North Carolina

Young`s Auto Center & Salvage ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Electrical Equipment
Address: 400 Nash St NE, Kenly
Phone: (877) 594-2693

Wright`s Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: 601 Julian Ave, Belews-Creek
Phone: (336) 472-0755

Wilson Off Road ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Auto Body Parts
Address: 520 E Russell St, Lumber-Bridge
Phone: (910) 423-4947

Whitman Speed & Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 997 jacob street, Archdale
Phone: (336) 313-5237

Webster`s Import Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 306 Grumman Rd, Walkertown
Phone: (336) 393-0023

Vester Nissan ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 412 Southeast Blvd, Faison
Phone: (910) 590-2005

Auto blog

What if the mid-engine Corvette is really a Cadillac?

Tue, Jun 28 2016

Call me crazy, but I'm not convinced the mid-engine Corvette is the next Corvette. The rumor is strong, yes. And, contrary to some of the comments on our site, Car and Driver - leader of the mid-engine Corvette speculation brigade - has a pretty good record predicting future models. But it's another comment that got me thinking: or maybe it's a Cadillac. There is clearly something mid-engine going on at GM, and I think it makes sense for the car to be a Cadillac. First off, check out how sweet the 2002 Cadillac Cien concept car still looks in the photo above. Second, there are too many holes in the mid-engine Corvette theory. There are too many holes in the mid-engine Corvette theory. The C7 is relatively young in Corvette years, starting production almost three years ago as a 2014 model. Showing a 2019 model at the 2018 North American International Auto Show would kill sales of a strong-selling car before its time. Not to mention it would only mean a short run for the Grand Sport, which was the best-selling version of the previous generation. More stuff doesn't add up. Mid-engine cars are, in general, more expensive. Moving the Vette upmarket leaves a void that the Camaro does not fill. There's not much overlap between Camaro and Corvette customers. Corvette owners are older and enjoy features like a big trunk that holds golf clubs. Mid-engine means less trunk space and alienating a happy, loyal buyer. Also, more than 60 years of history. The Corvette is an icon along the likes of the Porsche 911 and Ford Mustang. I'm not sure the car-buying public wants a Corvette that abandons all previous conventions. And big changes bring uncertainty - I don't think GM would make such a risky bet. Chevrolet could build a mid-engine ZR1, you might say, and keep the other Corvettes front-engine. Yes they could, and it would cost a ton of money. And they still need to fund development of that front-engine car. I highly doubt the corporate accountants would go for that. But a Cadillac? Totally. Cadillac is in the middle of a brand repositioning. GM is throwing money at this effort. A mid-engine halo car is the just the splash the brand needs to shake off the ghosts of Fleetwoods past. And it's already in Cadillac President Johan De Nysschen's playbook. He was in charge of Audi's North America arm when the R8 came out. A Caddy sports car priced above $100,000 isn't that unreasonable when you can already price a CTS-V in that range.

IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving

Tue, Oct 11 2022

WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.

Chevy Volt has worst sales month since August 2011, Nissan Leaf also down

Tue, Feb 3 2015

January is traditionally a time when new car shoppers take a break. For the last few years, if we isolate our focus to just the first two major plug-in cars in the US market, we see that the first month of the year was lower – often dramatically lower – than the 11 that followed. So, when you see the Chevy Volt dropped and Nissan Leaf sales figures for January 2015, don't be too surprised. The Volt sold only 542 units last month, that model's lowest since August 2011. That also represents a 41 percent drop from January 2014, and it reinforces the thought that if anyone out there is interested in a new Volt, they're going to be waiting for the new model to drop later this year. While we do expect sales to climb in February and into spring, we won't be surprised if the general Volt trend remains quiet until the second-generation arrives. On the Leaf side of the ledger, January's low sales numbers were still about twice as high as the Volt's – the Leaf sold 1,070 units last month, the lowest since February 2013 – but it did break a streak for the Japanese automaker. Usually, each month represents at least an increase over the same month a year ago, but that wasn't the case this time. In January 2014, Nissan sold 1,252 Leafs. Still, Brendan Jones, Nissan's director of electric vehicle sales and infrastructure, issued an upbeat statement: "We saw a significant increase in demand in December from Nissan Leaf customers looking to take advantage of federal and state incentives at the end of the tax year, which pulled some sales ahead. We're confident that EV sales will continue to rise over time due to increasing emission regulations and other reasons for purchase of EVs such as lower operating costs, reducing dependence on foreign energy sources, environmental concerns and a great driving experience." The numbers will tell us soon enough. News Source: General Motors, Nissan Green Chevrolet Nissan Electric Hybrid ev sales brendan jones