Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1983 Chevrolet El Camino Conquista 305 V8, 79k Miles on 2040-cars

US $4,500.00
Year:1983 Mileage:79700 Color: White /
 Blue
Location:

Howell, Michigan, United States

Howell, Michigan, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Standard Cab Pickup
Engine:5.0L 305Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1gccw8090dr269478
Year: 1983
Interior Color: Blue
Make: Chevrolet
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: El Camino
Trim: Conquista Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 79,700
Sub Model: Conquista
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: White
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty

 1983 El Camino 305 V8, Turbo 350 Trans. with shift kit. , 79K Miles. New Headers and Exhaust system. Edelbrock Intake and Carb. Heads were redone about 10K miles ago. Corvette Rally wheels. Air Shocks. Console and wide bucket seats are not original but are GM. Body & bed are solid but has a few rust spots. Frame rail between rear bumper and rear wheel has some rust.  Paint is not original. Runs and drives good. For sale $4500 obo or trade.

Auto Services in Michigan

Winners Auto & Cycle ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Engine Rebuilding, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 17700 Telegraph Rd, Romulus
Phone: (734) 229-1009

Westborn Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2823 Monroe St, Hazel-Park
Phone: (313) 565-0220

Weber Transmission Company ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 130 Oakdale Ave, Luna-Pier
Phone: (419) 698-1011

Vaneck Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 4520 Chicago Dr SW, Grandville
Phone: (616) 532-1626

US Wheel Exchange ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Automobile Accessories
Address: 25245 John R Rd, Keego-Harbor
Phone: (248) 373-1300

U Name IT Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 7162 E Apple Ave, Ravenna
Phone: (231) 788-1970

Auto blog

Race Recap: 2013 Indianapolis 500 better than Bollywood; all the emotion, none of the music [spoilers]

Mon, 27 May 2013

If the 2013 Indy 500 were a movie it would be the one expected to win all the little statues come awards season, and if it were an athlete it would have made spectators watch in awe as it broke record after record. And this kind of talk comes after last year's race was considered one of the best ever - the last lap hijinks in 2012 and Takuma Sato's crash leading to a podium ceremony straight out of a Golden Globes tearjerker.
But this year's race delivered more than anyone expected, from the 250,000 fans to the commentators to the IndyCar series itself and, finally, to the guy who hopped through a two-mile window on Lap 197 to take the lead and keep it until the end.

Which electric cars can charge at a Tesla Supercharger?

Sun, Jul 9 2023

The difference between Tesla charging and non-Tesla charging. Electrify America; Tesla Tesla's advantage has long been its charging technology and Supercharger network. Now, more and more automakers are switching to Tesla's charging tech. But there are a few things non-Tesla drivers need to know about charging at a Tesla station. A lot has hit the news cycle in recent months with regard to electric car drivers and where they can and can't plug in. The key factor in all of that? Whether automakers switched to Tesla's charging standard. More car companies are shifting to Tesla's charging tech in the hopes of boosting their customers' confidence in going electric.  Here's what it boils down to: If you currently drive a Tesla, you can keep charging at Tesla charging locations, which use the company's North American Charging Standard (NACS), which has long served it well. The chargers are thinner, more lightweight and easier to wrangle than other brands.  If you currently drive a non-Tesla EV, you have to charge at a non-Tesla charging station like that of Electrify America or EVgo — which use the Combined Charging System (CCS) — unless you stumble upon a Tesla charger already equipped with the Magic Dock adapter. For years, CCS tech dominated EVs from everyone but Tesla.  Starting next year, if you drive a non-Tesla EV (from the automakers that have announced they'll make the switch), you'll be able to charge at all Supercharger locations with an adapter. And by 2025, EVs from some automakers won't even need an adaptor.  Here's how to charge up, depending on which EV you have:  Ford 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E. Tim Levin/Insider Ford was the earliest traditional automaker to team up with Tesla for its charging tech. Current Ford EV owners — those driving a Ford electric vehicle already fitted with a CCS port — will be able to use a Tesla-developed adapter to access Tesla Superchargers starting in the spring. That means that, if you own a Mustang Mach-E or Ford F-150 Lightning, you will need the adapter in order to use a Tesla station come 2024. But Ford will equip its future EVs with the NACS port starting in 2025 — eliminating the need for any adapter. Owners of new Ford EVs will be able to pull into a Supercharger station and juice up, no problem. General Motors Cadillac Lyriq. Cadillac GM will also allow its EV drivers to plug into Tesla stations.

Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout

Tue, Nov 25 2014

Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.