Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1972 Chevrolet El Camino Base 396 4 Speed on 2040-cars

Year:1972 Mileage:0
Location:

Berwick, Pennsylvania, United States

Berwick, Pennsylvania, United States

 FOR SALE

1972 El Camino
Frame off restoration to this point, needs to be finished.

NEW FLOOR PANS
NEW BED FLOOR
ALL BODY WORK DONE & IN PRIMER

1968 396 - 350 horse 2 bolt main
bored 30 over

m 21 muncy 4 speed
new flywheel & clutch
new oem bell housing
new powermaster starter





new parts

comp cams hi energy hydraulic flat tappet cam & lifters
new valve stem seals
cloyes true roller timing chain & gears
comp cams roller rockers
new hooker headers
alum weiand hiflow water pump
hei ignition with correct cap
moroso tall valve covers
chrome oil pan
chrome timing cover
Power Master 100 amp Chrome alternator
Chrome pulleys
all new inside oem door panels not even cut or installed yet
bench cloth seat
hurst shifter
new gm sill plates
new pash pad cover from opgi
all new ss emblems
ss grille emblem
ss hood
new inner steel fender wells
new brakes,
New slotted and cross drilled front rotors
calipers and hoses
new drum backing plates
comes with a 10 bolt & 12 bolt rear, 410 gears


Just purchased new taylor 8mm Race sprral ignition wires
New 750 satin finish holley carb
alum race
radiator with twin cooling fans

will have to be trailored, this just needs a little work to finish it and you have an fantastic frame off restoration with lots of chrome & horse power

plenty more to list, questions...... please im me if interested & i will discuss price

I must sell this, no decent offer will be refused.......over 15 k invested 






List of what needs to be done:

mostly wiring, I have 2 harnesses for this car.......all the wires need to be run thru out the whole car.

guages & tach hooked up

z bar adjustment rod

throttle linkage

cam " break in " I have royal purple break in oil in the engine but never started it since installing the valve train
 

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

West Penn Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 10479 Route 6N, West-Springfield
Phone: (814) 756-4464

Wallace Towing & Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Roadside Service, Towing
Address: Hilliards
Phone: (724) 452-4200

Truck Accessories by TruckAmmo ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Accessories
Address: 3227 Perkiomen Ave, Goodville
Phone: (877) 612-6341

Town Service Center ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tires-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Tire Dealers
Address: Lincoln-University
Phone: (610) 857-3585

Tom`s Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Leasing, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 75 Fowler St, Dingmans-Ferry
Phone: (845) 858-2755

Stottsville Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 1991 Valley Rd, Intercourse
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Auto blog

The biggest gas-guzzlers of 2024: 'The Meanest List' is the opposite of greenest cars

Thu, Mar 14 2024

In some circles — especially some automotive circles — bigger is better. This explains the Hummer, for example. In its so-called “Meanest List” of a dozen models, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) makes no apologies for berating “the worst-performing mass market automobiles” sold in 2024 in the U.S. The most diminutive car on the list is a Chevy Corvette Z06. At the top of this particular heap is the Mercedes-Benz AMG G63, a gas-powered SUV that the environmental agency says was “the worst-performing vehicle of the more than 1,200 models assessed by Greener Cars and has an annual fuel cost over $4,000.” Not to mention its MSRP of around $184,000. Rank Make & Model Powertrain Green Score MSRP Estimated Annual Fuel Cost* 1 Mercedes-Benz AMG G63 Gas 20 $184,000 $4,242 2 Ram 1500 TRX 4x4 Gas 22 $98,335 $3,819 3 Ford F150 Raptor R Gas 24 $79,975 $3,777 4 Cadillac Escalade V Gas 26 $152,295 $3,388 5 Dodge Durango SRT Gas 26 $74,995 $3,332 6 Jeep Wrangler 4dr 4X4 Gas 27 $35,895 $3,260 7 Jeep Grand Wagoneer 4x4 Gas 28 $91,945 $3,058 8 Mercedes-Benz G550 Gas 28 $143,000 $3,186 9 GMC Hummer EV SUV EV 29 $98,845 $1,746 10 GMC Sierra Gas 29 $37,700 $3,069 11 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Gas 30 $114,395 $3,169 12 Mercedes-Benz Maybach S680 Gas 30 $234,300 $3,031 *ACEEE analysis using EIA data of the annual cost of driving 15,000 miles In terms of numbers, the dirty dozen of the meanest includes seven SUVs and three trucks. Lonely at the middle of the list is the sole electric, the GMC Hummer EV, which weighs in at 9,000 pounds. The council notes that “though EVs have lower emissions than similarly sized gasoline models, the Hummer demonstrates that size and efficiency, not just fuel source, are important factors in a carÂ’s environmental impact.” ItÂ’s also worth reminding prospective buyers that the average fuel cost of a vehicle on the “Greenest List” eats up only a fifth of the fuel cost of a vehicle on the Meanest List, “showing that greener options can also be more affordable.” The ACEEE also put out a "Greener List" of efficient gasoline and hybrid cars that don't require plugging in.  By the Numbers Green Cadillac Chevrolet Dodge Ford GMC Hummer Jeep Maybach Mercedes-Benz RAM Emissions Fuel Efficiency Green Automakers Truck SUV Electric Hybrid

Cadillac could base its entry-level sedan on the Chevy Cruze [UPDATE]

Wed, Apr 27 2016

UPDATE: Cadillac spokesperson Donny Nordlicht tells Autoblog , "The post speculating on a future Cadillac model derived from the Chevrolet Cruze is completely false." Premium automakers Mercedes-Benz and Audi have seen plenty of success with new small front-drive-based sedans. The CLA-Class had its best January ever this year, while Audi moved more of its new A3 in 2015 than its predecessor sold in 2005 through 2010 combined. The fact that Cadillac wants a piece of that pie is no surprise, then. There's a new rumor that GM's luxury brand could launch its own compact – possibly called CT2 – to battle the Germans. Cadillac, a brand that's pushed hard to rebuild its rear-drive reputation, could develop a new entry-level model based on the front-wheel-drive 2016 Chevrolet Cruze's D2XX platform. Go ahead and make your Cimarron jokes. Sources are telling GM Inside News that a Cadillac built on the Delta platform would ditch the Cruze's turbocharged 1.4-liter four-cylinder for a 1.5-liter turbo in base models. General Motors' well received 2.0-liter turbo four would serve in higher-end models. According to GMIN, the Delta-based Cadillac would likely command a $6,000 to $9,000 premium over the Cruze, so figure $23,000 to $26,000 on the low end to $30,000 to $33,000 for something at the top of the range. As much as we dislike the kind of badge engineering that brought us the Cavalier-based Cadillac Cimarron in the '80s, the company has done an admirable job of distinguishing vehicles on shared platforms lately. A Delta-platform Cadillac would at least have a good basis – the new Cruze is surprisingly comfy. That said, we question GM's rationale if this rumor is indeed true. Put simply, Cadillac needs another sedan like I need another student loan payment. The company has four sedans, three of which overlap two segments, and none of which are selling very well. That's not because they're bad, but because customers want crossovers, of which Caddy has but one – the new XT5. Spending the time and money to add a fifth sedan to the mix when the company desperately needs to flesh out its CUV range would be a tremendous mistake. As much as we hate to say it, if Cadillac really wants to add a small, entry-level car to its range, it'd better be a crossover. Related Video:

Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]

Tue, 05 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.