Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport New 2 Dr Convertible Gasoline 6.2l V8 Sfi Ohv 16v on 2040-cars
Duluth, Georgia, United States
Engine:6.2L 376Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Convertible
Transmission:Manual
Fuel Type:GAS
Make: Chevrolet
Options: Leather, Compact Disc
Model: Corvette
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Side Airbag
Trim: Grand Sport Convertible 2-Door
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Drive Type: RWD
Doors: 2
Mileage: 0
Engine Description: 6.2L V8 SFI OHV 16V
Sub Model: Grand Sport
Number of Doors: 2
Exterior Color: ARCTIC WHT
Interior Color: Red
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Chevrolet Corvette for Sale
- 1959 chevrolet corvette
- 2008 convertible, ls3, 12,804 miles, garage kept, automatic with paddle shifters(US $39,995.00)
- Zo6 corvette 2011 very rare jet stream blue 1 of 28 made in 2011, cfz option lz3(US $64,000.00)
- 1981 corvette l82(US $12,500.00)
- 2007 chevrolet corvette z06 coupe 2-door 7.0l(US $36,000.00)
- Beautiful corvette coupe 327 4 speed, #'s matching restoration(US $57,889.00)
Auto Services in Georgia
World Toyota ★★★★★
Watson/Boyd Auto Repair ★★★★★
Trantham`s Service Center & Wrecker Service ★★★★★
Thomson Automotive Parts ★★★★★
Suwanee Park Auto Service ★★★★★
Summit Racing Equipment ★★★★★
Auto blog
The USPS needs 180,000 new delivery vehicles, automakers gearing up to bid
Wed, Feb 18 2015Winning the New York City Taxi of Tomorrow tender was a huge prize for Nissan, even though the company is still working through the process of claiming its prize. The United States Postal Service has begun the process to take bids for a new delivery vehicle to replace the all-too-familiar Grumman Long Life Vehicle, and that will be a much larger plum for the automaker who wins it, perhaps worth more than six billion dollars. The Grumman LLV is an aluminum body covering a Chevrolet S-10 pickup chassis and General Motors' Iron Duke four-cylinder engine. The USPS bought them from 1987 to 1994, and the 163,000 of them still in service are a monumental drain on postal resources: they get roughly ten miles to the gallon instead of the quoted 16 mpg, drink up more than $530 million in fuel each year, and their constant repair needs like the balky sliding door and leaky windshields have led the service to increase the annual maintenance budget from $100 million to $500 million. A seat belt is about as modern as it gets for safety technology, and the USPS says that assuming things stay the same, it can't afford to run them beyond 2017. Last year it put out two triage requests for proposals seeking 10,000 new chassis and drivetrains for the Grumman and 10,000 new vehicles. The LLV is also too small for the modern mail system in which package delivery is growing and letter delivery is declining. The service says it doesn't have a fixed idea of the ideal "next-generation delivery vehicles," but it listed a number of requirements in its initial request and is open to any proposal. Carriers have some suggestions, though, saying they want better cupholders, sun visors that they can stuff letters behind, a driver's compartment free of slits that can swallow mail, and a backup camera. The request for information sent to automakers pegs the tender at 180,000 vehicles that would cost between $25,000 and $35,000 apiece, and it will hold a conference on February 18 to answer questions about the contract. GM is the only domestic maker to avow an interest, while Ford and Fiat-Chrysler have remained cagey. Yet with a possible $6.3 billion up for grabs and some new vans for sale that would be advertised on every block in the country, we have a feeling everyone will be listening closely come February 18. We also have a feeling the LeMons series is going to be flooded with Grummans come 2017. News Source: Wall Street Journal, Automotive News - sub.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
Officially Official: Chevrolet replaces Daewoo name in Korea
Thu, 20 Jan 2011
Chevrolet Camaro in Korea - Click above for high-resolution image
There once was a time when Daewoo was one of the biggest companies in South Korea. It was larger than both LG and Samsung, and second only to Hyundai. But these days the name is all but gone.