2008 Crystal Red Metallic 3lt Coupe. One Owner With 43,000 Miles-mint on 2040-cars
Klamath Falls, Oregon, United States
This is a one owner, 2008 Corvette Coupe with the 3LT equipment package. The car is always garaged, is in like new condition and is cigarette smoke free. The car was special ordered from Suburban Chevrolet in Sandy, Oregon and has been serviced every 5,000 miles since the purchase. Base price for this vehicle was $45,170.00. With all the options, the total vehicle price was $57,095.00. Options include; AM/FM stereo, 6 disc CD changer, MP3 Format, Bose Premium 7 speaker system, Head up display, Power telescoping steering wheel, heated seats, memory package, Universal Home Remote, Adjustable sport Bucket seats with perforated leather inserts, 6 way power adjustable seats, luggage shade and parcel net, steering wheel radio controls, Magnetic selective ride control including driver selectable tour and sport settings, larger cross drilled brake rotors, Chrome aluminum wheels, 6-speed paddle shift automatic, removeable transparent roof panel, Crystal Red Metallic Tintcoat. Shipping will be the buyers responsibility but owner will assist in getting the car to the transport means once payment has been completed and cleared through the Bank. If the car needs to be stored for a short period of time prior to transport, owner will work with the buyer to make that happen. Cash would be owners preferred payment choice. |
Chevrolet Corvette for Sale
2005 chevy corvette targa top auto htd leather hud 33k texas direct auto(US $28,980.00)
1965 chevrolet corvette roadster matching numbers 327 muncie 4 speed no reser
2006 chevy corvette 6.0l v8 auto targa top xenons 20k texas direct auto(US $28,980.00)
1975 chevrolet corvette stingray coupe 2-door 5.7l no reserve
1999 corvette coupe 49k miles torch red hud low miles chrome wheels like new
2009 chevrolet corvette base coupe 2-door 6.2l v8 automatic performance exhaust(US $32,000.00)
Auto Services in Oregon
Uncle Al`s Automotive Service ★★★★★
Toyota of Gladstone ★★★★★
Tommy`s Window Tinting ★★★★★
Three Sisters Automotive ★★★★★
Peoria Electric ★★★★★
Oak Valley Honda ★★★★★
Auto blog
Question of the Day: What's the most irritating car name?
Wed, Mar 9 2016You hear a lot about how the Chevrolet Nova was a sales flop in Mexico because "No va" means "it doesn't go" in Spanish; in fact, the Nova sold pretty well south of the border, and in any case most Spanish-speakers know that "Nova" means "new" in Latin and Portuguese. However, General Motors doesn't deserve to be let off the hook for bad car names, because the Oldsmobile Achieva— no doubt inspired by the excruciating "coffee achievers" ads of the 1980s— scrapes the biggest fingernails down the screechiest chalkboard in the US-market car-name world. That is, unless you think Daihatsu's incomprehensible choice of Charade was worse. Meanwhile, Japanese car buyers could get machines with cool names like Mazda Bongo Friendee or Honda Life Dunk. It's just not fair! So, what car name drives you the craziest? Related Video: Auto News Design/Style Chevrolet Honda Mazda Daihatsu Automotive History questions car names
This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location
Thu, Apr 28 2016Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.
Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?
Sat, Sep 23 2017If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd