Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1976 Coupe 350 4-speed L-82 on 2040-cars

Year:1976 Mileage:50000 Color: Red /
 Red
Location:

Saint Albans, West Virginia, United States

Saint Albans, West Virginia, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:350
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1z37x63411416 Year: 1976
Interior Color: Red
Make: Chevrolet
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Corvette
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: coupe
Drive Type: std
Engine Size (cc): 350
Mileage: 50,000
Transmission Type: std 4-speed
Exterior Color: Red
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This is a 1976 Corvette L-82 350 4-speed. This car had been sitting a long time.I bought this off ebay and after three months never recived the right papers to get a title in Wv, so it will be sold with bill of sale and NO TITLE. I will give you the papers I have, and I guess there are ways to get a title but I don't want to mess with it. This car is suppose to have only 50 thousand original miles, but it has been setting as long time. I have drove it around the yard, clutch feels good trans shifts good. Frame is good for a driver, but does have places in rear corners at front of rear tires, exhaust good. Engine runs rough, and sometimes you can hear a knocking noise not all the time, holds good oil pressure and doesn't overheat. The driver side latch on door quit working and I pull it loose to look at but never put back together. Pass side door skin is loose at bottom but works ok. Interior is in good shape all gauges work except fuel, has tilt wheel. power windows, left works and right doesn't. All air condition is hooked up and steering has no leaks and works good. Tires and wheels doesn't have that many miles but tires has cracks in them and wheels need cleaned. This has a lot of good parts, or with a title it would be worth restoring.

.  No 0-10 feedback bidders unless you contact me first    No warranty   Buyer in charge of shipping, I will help all I can   300.00 deposit after action


 

Auto Services in West Virginia

Thumpin Car Stereo Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems, Consumer Electronics
Address: 17715 Virginia Ave Ste 1, Hedgesville
Phone: (301) 739-8814

Saffford Chrysler Jeep Dodge ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1659 Berryville Pike, Ridgeway
Phone: (540) 667-5532

Roy`s Quality Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Auto Transmission
Address: 8 E Oak Ridge Dr, Falling-Waters
Phone: (301) 733-1771

Griff`s Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 409 E 8th St, Mineral-Wells
Phone: (304) 485-9050

Fisher Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 424 Fairmont Ave, Shinnston
Phone: (304) 363-9100

City Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 340 Dual Hwy, Falling-Waters
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Auto blog

This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location

Thu, Apr 28 2016

Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.

Smaller Cars Endure Big Problems On Crash Test

Wed, Jan 22 2014

In a crash test of 11 of the smallest cars on the market, only one vehicle received an acceptable rating. The rest received marginal or poor ratings in the study, providing evidence that supports a widely held notion that smaller cars are among the least safe on the road. No other vehicle group has performed as poorly on a new crash test than these mini cars, says the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the nonprofit group that conducted the testing. The latest results of which were released Wednesday. The Chevrolet Spark was the only car earning an overall "acceptable" rating on the small-front overlap test, and even that vehicle had its shortcomings, IIHS said. "Small lightweight vehicles have an inherent safety disadvantage," said Joe Nolan, the senior vice president for vehicle research at IIHS. "That's why it's even more important to choose one with the best occupant protection. Unfortunately, as a group, minicars aren't performing as well as other vehicle categories." The Mazda2, Kia Rio, Toyota Yaris and certain Ford Fiesta models all received "marginal" overall grades on the test, while the Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, Toyota Prius C, Hyundai Accent, Fiat 500 and Honda Fit all earned "poor" ratings. Results from these sub-compact cars fare much worse than vehicles sized just a little bit bigger, IIHS said. Among 17 cars evaluated in the small category, five earned "good" ratings and five more earned "acceptable." Only introduced a year ago, the small-front overlap test has quickly become a key indicator of differences in automotive safety. IIHS introduced it as a way to replicate what happens when the front corner of a vehicle collides with a tree or utility pole at 40 miles per hour. In the real world, these sorts of accidents are more dangerous than others, in part because they bypass the front-end crush zones on most cars. TOP 5Most Researched Sedans 2013 Honda Accord MSRP : $21,680 2013 Hyundai Sonata MSRP : $20,895 2013 Nissan Altima MSRP : $21,760 2014 Honda Accord MSRP : $21,955 2013 Toyota Corolla MSRP : $16,230 Automakers have been rushing to make design changes to the front ends of their cars. Without a grade of acceptable or better, they cannot qualify for the IIHS' overall Top Safety Pick+ honor, given annually to the safest models on the market.

Texas sues GM, saying it tricked customers into sharing driving data sold to insurers

Wed, Aug 14 2024

Texas filed a lawsuit Tuesday against GM over years of alleged abuse of customers' data and trust. New car owners were presented with a "confusing and highly misleading" process that was implied to be for their safety, but "was no more than a deceptively designed sales flow" that surrendered their data for GM to sell. The suit contends that at no point was selling driving data ever even suggested as a possibility, putting GM in violation of the state's consumer protection laws. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is seeking a jury trial and at least $10,000 per offense (every GM car sold in the state since 2015) and a hefty add-on of $250,000 in cases where the victim was over 65. Texas seems to be flying high after a recent $1.4 billion settlement from Meta over other privacy concerns. This may well be a way to solve any pending budgetary issues in the Lone Star State.