Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1976 Corvette Stingray on 2040-cars

Year:1976 Mileage:63000 Color: Flame Orange /
 Black
Location:

New Haven, Indiana, United States

New Haven, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:L48 350
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1976
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Corvette
Trim: Stingray
Options: Leather Seats
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Windows
Drive Type: Rear wheel drive
Mileage: 63,000
Exterior Color: Flame Orange
Number of Doors: 2
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Welcome to our auction, today we have a 1976 Corvette Stingray, this is the last year for the Stingray. I am the second owner of this car and I have owned it for the last 24 years. During this time I put only 11,000 miles on it. Since I purchased the car it has been driven out in the rain only four times when I would get caught coming home from car shows. It has been stored in a heated garage. The car has 63,000 miles on it and it runs great. It has new tires and brakes on it and a new carburetor as well as new a/c hoses so it blows cold air, this work was completed two summers ago.

The body was repainted to the original flame orange color prior to my purchasing it 24 years ago. I had the rear bumper replaced and painted to match two years ago because the urethane bumper started to crack. There are a couple spider web cracks in the paint around the security lock key hole, (See photo). There is also another crack in the elbow rest in the drivers door vinyl, (See Photo).

Car Features:

L48 350ci Automatic, Power Steering, Power 4 Wheel Disc Brakes, Air Conditioner blows cold air, Map Light, Rear Window Defogger, Telescoping Steering Wheel, AM/FM Stereo, Black Leather Seats, T-Topps, Two year old tires with only with less than 500 miles on them, Factory Security System and Power windows.

Auto Services in Indiana

Zips Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 388 S B St, Scipio
Phone: (513) 867-9722

West Coliseum Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1029 W Coliseum Blvd, Laotto
Phone: (260) 484-6100

WE Are Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 101 N State Road 57, Washington
Phone: (812) 254-2950

Van Winkle Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1529 Highway 64 NW, Ramsey
Phone: (812) 347-3134

Stoops Buick GMC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4055 W Clara Ln, Oakville
Phone: (765) 273-6904

Staples Pipe & Muffler ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems, Automobile Accessories
Address: 523 Hoosier St, Vernon
Phone: (812) 346-2474

Auto blog

Chevy Trax engineer says GMC version possible

Mon, Dec 8 2014

The Buick Encore is doing so well and its platform-mate the Chevrolet Trax has such good reviewer vibes going for it already, that a GMC version hasn't been ruled out. During the recent press launch, Automotive News asked lead engineer Al Manzor if the Trax could wear a GMC-branded suit, to which Manzor replied, "I think that is certainly possible." That's a long way from telling us anything about the probability of a GMC version of the Trax, and a legion of questions would need to be answered before it could happen. How would a GMC version be priced to leave room for the $26,465 GMC Terrain but not eat into sales of the $20,995 Trax or the $24,035 Encore? Or would that matter? Could it primarily be considered to encourage a new faction of The Yukon Set at the compact end, GMC buyers being famously committed to the marque? And of course, would there be a Denali version? It'll probably be a long while before we have any kind of answers, but if you want to see it happen, the door to your campaign of persuasion is at least ajar.

GM diesel pickups first to undergo extra EPA, CARB testing

Tue, Sep 29 2015

The effects of Volkswagen's long-running diesel emissions evasion are starting to spill over to other automakers, but General Motors is taking things in stride. The 2.8-liter, four-cylinder Duramax in the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon is the first engine to get extra scrutiny by the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board, Automotive News reports. Rather than just the usual in-lab test, it's also being checked on the road. However, the extra evaluation shouldn't have any impact on when the trucks with his mill hit dealers later this fall. "We're in our final stages of the EPA certification, and our launch is on track," Chevy spokesperson Otie McKinley tells Autoblog. The four-cylinder diesel in the trucks makes 181 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque, and the automaker is touting low NOx production. In the announcement for the Colorado's specs, the company calls it "the cleanest diesel truck engine ever produced by General Motors." The tech includes exhaust gas recirculation to lower combustion temperatures and improve emissions. There's also a urea tank like on the bigger diesels for full-size trucks, and it gets refilled in time with oil changes. An indication on the instrument panel lets drivers know when that's needed, too. Even with the more demanding testing, the company doesn't seem too worried about the four-cylinder passing. "Part of our development process is on-road and off-road [laboratory] testing," Scott Yackley, Chevy Trucks assistant chief engineer, said to Automotive News. In the wake of the VW scandal, the EPA has pledged more rigorous testing. Before, on-road emissions evaluations were largely limited to heavy-duty vehicles, but the agency has decided to apply the checks more often to other models. There's also now greater cooperation with Canadian authorities.

GM’s Charlie Wilson was right: Stronger regulations can help U.S. automakers

Fri, Oct 26 2018

Charlie Wilson had been the president and CEO of General Motors before being nominated to become secretary of defense by Dwight Eisenhower. During his Senate confirmation hearings, he controversially said, "For years I thought what was good for our country was good for General Motors, and vice versa." And he was right. While car companies aren't necessarily the most progressive when it comes to things that might have the slightest possibility of political blowback, General Motors should be credited for doing something absolutely forthright in this regard with its announcement that it wants the federal U.S. government not to squash the California Air Resources Board's emissions requirements but to actually create a 50-state "National Zero Emissions Vehicle" program that, in the words of Mark Reuss, executive vice president and president, Global Product Group and Cadillac, "will drive the scale and infrastructure investments needed to allow the U.S. to lead the way to a zero emission future." Filing comments to the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks is one thing. But a graphic the company developed for this announcement — shown above — is something else entirely, something that is absolutely credible, creative and clever. There is a photo of a Chevrolet Bolt EV driving along a highway, which seems to be in Marin County (based on the blurred San Francisco skyline in the background). Text on the photo states: "It's Time for American Leadership in Zero Emissions Vehicles." It seems to say, in effect, "If we want to make America great again, then we're going to do it by leading in technology, not by retreating behind weakened regulations." General Motors understands that the auto market is globally competitive, and if U.S.-based companies are going to be in the game, then they'd better be able to out-innovate the companies based elsewhere, where emissions and economy standards are not being weakened. What's good for our country ... Related Video: