Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1968 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Convertible on 2040-cars

Year:1968 Mileage:41465 Color: Red /
 Black
Location:

Fremont, California, United States

Fremont, California, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:427 V8
Body Type:Convertible with Detachable Hard Top
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: N Year: 1968
Sub Model: Stingray
Make: Chevrolet
Exterior Color: Red
Model: Corvette
Interior Color: Black
Trim: Convertible
Drive Type: Automatic
Mileage: 41,465
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Classic that needs minor work."

 

 

1968 Classic Chevrolet Corvette Convertible Stingray
427 C.I. , Quadra Jet four barrel, 390 HP (L36)
 
Power Steering, Power Brakes, Power Windows
Turbo Hydromatic 400 Transmission (Automatic)
OEM Standard Posi-traction Rear End.
Replaced OEM vinyl top to high grade canvas soft convertible top
 
This vehicle was rebuilt in the early '80's and then has been garaged ever since.
Work that was done is as follows:
 
Chrome Plated OEM fan shroud
Chrome Plated OEM upper and lower control arms
Chrome Plated OEM drive shaft and half shafts
Polished OEM aluminum intake manifold
All new exhaust system; manifold, pipes, and muffler
Rebuilt master cylinder and all four brake calipers
All new rear trailing arm bearings @ rear wheels (rear axles)
OEM Ignition distributor system is replaced with HEI gear drive Tach meter distributor
Paint Job by: "Classic Coach Works" (1990 Ferrari Red Enamel Ruzzo.) Painted in late 1980's
OEM Engine is completely Rebuilt; Blue Printed and Balanced by Peniman and Richards, Engine Block is bored out to 0.30 of inch
New TRW Forged Pistons (10.5/1 comp ratio), Chrome Moly Piston Rings, TRW Main and Connecting Rod Bearings.
OEM heads ground with three angle seat, new valves and valve springs
 
Vehicle runs great, looks great for its age, buts needs some minor work.
 
The wiper motor needs to be installed
The headlight doors need some adjustment to close properly
Weather stripping is new but needs to be installed
Radio needs to be replaced
Transmission has developed a slight leak
 
Vehicle is advertised locally and bidding may end early if sold.
 

Auto Services in California

Young`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3509 Grand Ave, Diablo
Phone: (510) 444-4185

Yas` Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 1610 Allston Way, Albany
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Wise Tire & Brake Co. Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 949 S La Brea Ave, Torrance
Phone: (310) 904-6163

Wilson Motorsports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2138 Otoole ave, San-Jose
Phone: (408) 267-7937

White Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 250 E Whittier Blvd, Los-Nietos
Phone: (562) 697-2612

Wheeler`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment
Address: 327 W 17th St, Santa-Ana
Phone: (714) 543-4689

Auto blog

Porsche, Jaguar continue dominance in 2015 JD Power APEAL study

Wed, Jul 22 2015

The top of JD Power's 2015 APEAL Study has not changed much in the last year. Porsche remains No. 1 with Jaguar nipping at its heels, although both premium brands saw their overall score fall compared to 2014. For those that need a refresher, the APEAL Study looks at how "gratifying" a vehicle is to own and drive, rating cars and brands on a 1,000-point scale. The industry average for 2015 has increased from 794 to 798, while the total number of automakers that finished above the curve increased from 16 to 20. While Porsche and Jaguar finished at the top, their scores dropped eight and seven points, respectively, to 874 and 855. The top "non-premium" brand was Mini, which scored an impressive 825, up from 795. If the BMW-owned British marque is still a bit too premium for your tastes, last year's non-premium winner, Hyundai, did climb five points and is this year's runner up. At the opposite end of the scale, Smart sits at the very bottom of the rankings, with a score of 683 (it didn't appear on the 2014 rankings). Fiat also dropped, from fourth worst in 2014 to second worst in 2015, despite the 500 being named most appealing city car. Subaru made an impressive climb, from third worst to seventh, falling just 10 points shy of the industry average and two points south of the non-premium average. In the individual vehicle segments, eight brands earned multiple awards, with Ford, Chevrolet, and Porsche earning three apiece. Surprise segment victories included the new Ford Expedition, which beat out Chevy's popular Suburban. The Infiniti QX80 bested the likes of the Cadillac Escalade and Range Rover for best large luxury SUV, and the Dodge Challenger beat its muscle car rivals from Ford and Chevy. Most of the victories, though, were quite predictable. The Mazda6 and CX-5 took wins for the midsize sedan and compact SUV categories respectively, while the Volkswagen Golf captured the compact car win. The Ford F-150 won the large pickup category, while the Porsche Cayman was named most appealing compact premium sporty car. Check out the official release on the 2015 APEAL Study, available below, from JD Power. 2015 U.S. APEAL Study Results The latest safety-related technologies are among the drivers of customer satisfaction with new vehicles, according to the J.D. Power 2015 U.S.

Recharge Wrap-up: Range-extended EV taxis in London, 2016 Chevy Volt interior two years old

Fri, Feb 13 2015

The first Metrocab range-extended EV taxis are operating on the streets of London. The cabs use a 12.2-kWh battery and two 50-kW motors, as well as a 1.0-liter gasoline range extender. Fuel economy is 98 MPGe on the ECE101 cycle, and total driving range is over 348 miles before needing to charge or refuel. Cabbies can expect to save GBP20 to GBP40 (about $30 to $60) per day on average. "The cash savings on fuel are significant, the ride and comfort outstanding, and my first customers are thrilled with the new cab," says the first operator of the new EV taxi, Preston Morris. "With its air suspension providing unrivaled comfort, panoramic glass roof for views of the city and silent powertrain, what's not to like?" Read more in the press release below. Chevrolet has had the interior design of the 2016 Volt finished for two years already, according to GM interior designer John McDougall. Beginning around 2010, GM received sketches from designers worldwide before narrowing it down to a handful of designs. Then the top three choices were molded from clay. The chosen theme was then refined for up to 18 months. "Every little thing you can imagine goes into that," says McDougall. "The glare angle from the windows, the placement of the controls, the placement of the seat. You have to create something that's beautiful and functional." Read more at GM Authority and at Inside EVs. More details have emerged about the Second Life Batteries Alliance. Vattenfall has announced a research project in partnership with BMW and Bosch to use retired EV batteries for stationary, grid-connected energy storage in Hamburg, Germany. Over 100 lithium-ion batteries from BMW i3 and ActiveE vehicles will make up a two-mWh storage unit for grid balancing, enough to power 30 four-person households for a week. The system is "compact enough to fit in a small building," says Bosch. Such storage systems are especially fit for storing and moving alternative forms of energy, which often fluctuate in supply more than electricity from a traditional power plant. Vattenhall will operate the storage unit for 10 years, with Bosch managing the batteries, during which time the three partners hope to learn more about battery applications and their performance over time. Read more at Green Car Congress, or in the press release below.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.