Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1968 Barn Kept Corvette T-top For Restoration on 2040-cars

Year:1968 Mileage:44372 Color: 972 POLAR WHITE /
  MEDIUM BLUE / V
Location:

Ashland, Pennsylvania, United States

Ashland, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:400 turbo hydra matic 3 spd
Engine:327/300HP
Body Type:T-TOP
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:OWNER
VIN: 194378S410604 Year: 1968
Interior Color: MEDIUM BLUE / V
Model: Corvette
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: 414
Drive Type: 2WD
Mileage: 44,372
Sub Model: T-TOP
Exterior Color: 972 POLAR WHITE
Warranty: NONE / SOLD AS IS
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

FOR THE SERIOUS COLLECTOR RESTORER.  YOU'RE BIDDING ON AN ORIGINAL EQUIPPED RESTORABLE 1968 POLAR WHITE / MEDIUM BLUE INTERIOR CORVETTE T-TOP 327/300 HP / 400 TURBO HYDRO TRANS / POWER STEERING / NO AIR / RALLY WHEELS WITH BEAUTY RIMS AND CENTERS, WHICH WAS BARN KEPT FOR 35 YEARS.  LAST INSPECTION 1978 ( IN BARN SINCE) 44,372 MILES / VIN 194378S410604. NEEDS TOTAL RESTORATION / FRAME SOLID WITH SOME RUST / BODY TIGHT / ONE DIME SIZE SPOT ON REAR PASS. 1/4 PANEL BELOW REAR BUMPER SHOWING FIBREGLASS/ ONE SURFACE SCRATCH ON DRIVER SEAT ( NOT A TEAR ) / TRIM ON BATTERY COVER BROKE / EXHAUST SHOT / ALL WHEELS TURN EXCEPT ONE ( DISC RUSTED)  WE DID NOT DO ANYTHING EXCEPT MOVE IT TO A  NEW GARAGE. TRIM 414 / PAINT 792. IF YOU NEED ANY MORE INFO OR PICS, LET ME KNOW. PICK UP ONLY. WE CAN LOAD WITH FORKLIFT. NEED NEW KEYS MADE ( LOST THROUGH THE YEARS) WE ARE SECOND OWNER.

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Zirkle`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2700 N Susquehanna Trl, Loganville
Phone: (717) 764-9481

Young`s Auto Transit ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Towing
Address: 2510 Spring Garden Ave, South-Heights
Phone: (412) 999-2605

Wolbert Auto Body and Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Auto Transmission
Address: 47 E Crafton Ave, Darlington
Phone: (412) 923-3219

Wilkie Lexus ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 568 W Lancaster Ave, Spring-House
Phone: (610) 525-0900

Vo Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Consultants
Address: 2825 Rudy Rd, Campbelltown
Phone: (717) 236-3034

Vince`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 50 Walnut Ave, Wrightstown
Phone: (215) 860-9392

Auto blog

The USPS needs 180,000 new delivery vehicles, automakers gearing up to bid

Wed, Feb 18 2015

Winning the New York City Taxi of Tomorrow tender was a huge prize for Nissan, even though the company is still working through the process of claiming its prize. The United States Postal Service has begun the process to take bids for a new delivery vehicle to replace the all-too-familiar Grumman Long Life Vehicle, and that will be a much larger plum for the automaker who wins it, perhaps worth more than six billion dollars. The Grumman LLV is an aluminum body covering a Chevrolet S-10 pickup chassis and General Motors' Iron Duke four-cylinder engine. The USPS bought them from 1987 to 1994, and the 163,000 of them still in service are a monumental drain on postal resources: they get roughly ten miles to the gallon instead of the quoted 16 mpg, drink up more than $530 million in fuel each year, and their constant repair needs like the balky sliding door and leaky windshields have led the service to increase the annual maintenance budget from $100 million to $500 million. A seat belt is about as modern as it gets for safety technology, and the USPS says that assuming things stay the same, it can't afford to run them beyond 2017. Last year it put out two triage requests for proposals seeking 10,000 new chassis and drivetrains for the Grumman and 10,000 new vehicles. The LLV is also too small for the modern mail system in which package delivery is growing and letter delivery is declining. The service says it doesn't have a fixed idea of the ideal "next-generation delivery vehicles," but it listed a number of requirements in its initial request and is open to any proposal. Carriers have some suggestions, though, saying they want better cupholders, sun visors that they can stuff letters behind, a driver's compartment free of slits that can swallow mail, and a backup camera. The request for information sent to automakers pegs the tender at 180,000 vehicles that would cost between $25,000 and $35,000 apiece, and it will hold a conference on February 18 to answer questions about the contract. GM is the only domestic maker to avow an interest, while Ford and Fiat-Chrysler have remained cagey. Yet with a possible $6.3 billion up for grabs and some new vans for sale that would be advertised on every block in the country, we have a feeling everyone will be listening closely come February 18. We also have a feeling the LeMons series is going to be flooded with Grummans come 2017. News Source: Wall Street Journal, Automotive News - sub.

2016 Green Truck of the Year, Commercial Green Car of the Year finalists

Sat, Oct 24 2015

Not only are commercial-grade haulers getting more green love lately, they're getting more different kinds of green love. The 2016 Green Truck of the Year, the second time the award has been handed out, is being decided by judges from Green Car Journal and the San Antonio Auto & Truck Show. This year the award is joined by the new 2016 Commercial Green Car of the Year, which crowns one of the little vans increasingly used by small business as cargo and delivery vehicles. The Green Truck of the Year finalists are the Chevrolet Colorado Duramax (pictured), Ford F-150, GMC Canyon Duramax, Nissan Titan XD, and Toyota Tacoma. The first three of those were on last year's list, but since they are completely new or upgraded for 2016 - Ford with its all-aluminum body, the General Motors twins with the new diesel Duramax engine - they qualify for entry again. The Ram 1500 EcoDiesel won last year. The Commercial Green Car finalists are the Chevrolet City Express, Ford Transit Connect, Mercedes-Benz Metris, Nissan NV200, and Ram ProMaster City. You can read more details in the presser below, and the awards will be announced in San Antonio sometime during the show from November 19-22. San Antonio Auto & Truck Show Announces 2016 Green Truck of the Year and Commercial Green Car of the Year Finalists SAN ANTONIO, Oct. 22, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Green Car Journal and the San Antonio Auto & Truck Show have announced finalists for the 2016 Green Truck of the Year™ and 2016 Commercial Green Car of the Year™ awards. The Green Truck of the Year™ nominees are the Chevrolet Colorado Duramax, Ford F-150, GMC Canyon Duramax, Nissan Titan XD, and Toyota Tacoma. Vying for the all-new 2016 Commercial Green Car of the Year™ award are the Chevrolet City Express, Ford Transit Connect, Mercedes-Benz Metris, Nissan NV200, and Ram ProMaster City. "Over the past few decades, new car models have benefitted from design and technology improvements that have brought higher fuel efficiency and greater levels of environmental compatibility," said Green Car Journal and CarsOfChange.com Editor and Publisher Ron Cogan. "With models like these ten deserving finalists, we're witnessing the pickup and light commercial vehicle field enjoying the same attention." The new Commercial Green Car of the Year™ award is part of an expanded awards program presented at this year's 2015 San Antonio Auto & Truck Show.

GM won't really kill off the Chevy Volt and Cadillac CT6, will it?

Fri, Jul 21 2017

General Motors is apparently considering killing off six slow-selling models by 2020, according to Reuters. But is that really likely? The news is mentioned in a story where UAW president Dennis Williams notes that slumping US car sales could threaten jobs at low-volume factories. Still, we're skeptical that GM is really serious about killing those cars. Reuters specifically calls out the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Sonic, and the Chevrolet Volt. Most of these have been redesigned or refreshed within the past few model years. Four - the LaCrosse, Impala, CT6, and Volt - are built in the Hamtramck factory in Detroit. That plant has made only 35,000 cars this year - down 32 percent from 2016. A typical GM plant builds 200,000-300,000 vehicles a year. Of all the cars Williams listed, killing the XTS, Impala, and Sonic make the most sense. They're older and don't sell particularly well. On the other hand, axing the other three seems like an odd move. It would leave Buick and Cadillac without flagship sedans, at least until the rumored Cadillac CT8 arrives. The CT6 was a big investment for GM and backing out after just a few years would be a huge loss. It also uses GM's latest and best materials and technology, making us even more skeptical. The Volt is a hugely important car for Chevrolet, and supplementing it with a crossover makes more sense than replacing it with one. Offering one model with a range of powertrain variants like the Hyundai Ioniq and Toyota Prius might be another route GM could take. All six of these vehicles are sedans, Yes, crossover sales are booming, but there's still a huge market for cars. Backing away from these would be essentially giving up sales to competitors from around the globe. The UAW might simply be publicly pushing GM to move crossover production to Hamtramck to avoid closing the plant and laying off workers. Sales of passenger cars are down across both GM and the industry. Consolidating production in other plants and closing Hamtramck rather than having a single facility focus on sedans might make more sense from a business perspective. GM is also trying to reduce its unsold inventory, meaning current production may be slowed or halted while current cars move into customer hands. There's a lot of politics that goes into building a car. GM wants to do what makes the most sense from a business perspective, while the UAW doesn't workers to lose their jobs when a factory closes.