Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1965 Corvair Convertible Monza/corsa on 2040-cars

US $11,000.00
Year:1965 Mileage:39000 Color: Torch Red /
 Black
Location:

Hope Mills, North Carolina, United States

Hope Mills, North Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:110
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 105675W2589857 Year: 1965
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Corvair
Trim: Corsa
Options: Convertible
Drive Type: Powerglide
Mileage: 39,000
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: Torch Red
Number of Doors: 2
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 6
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This a very nice 1965 Corvair that has had a huge over haul to include all Corsa interior/exterior emplems/badges.  The car started it's life as a regular Corvair Monza Convertible .  The interior is all original with the exception of the carpet.  The Monza dash and glove box were replaced with a working Corsa dash, odometer reads 39XXX and the stock dash had 42XXX (the clock is not working) and the cylinder temperature guage can be hooked up - it needs the sending unit but guage is functional. I have the stock dash and glovebox and it will go with. All of the organal Monza badges on the car and in the interior have been replaced by Corsa badges, All in the correct spots!!  This is a very good driver.  Gets 21 miles to the gallon at 70 mph.  Can make a long road trips with no problems.  The top is about 6 years old and in excellent condition.  The paint is about 4 years old.  This car is in overall mechanically great shape and drives wonderfully. Paint is Dupont Torch Red, 9.5 of 10, Body is straight with a few blemishes but its a driver not a trailer queen, I'd say 9 to 9.5... All glass is original with a little white fogging around the edges of the front window. All chrome and aluminum is in almost perfect shape. THIS CAR IS NICE period!!! Show car quality.

This car is for sale locally as well, questions call Jason (931) 624-6950

Auto Services in North Carolina

Your Automotive Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 1707 Battleground Ave, Mc-Leansville
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Whistle`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 100 Ranch Dr, Mint-Hill
Phone: (704) 882-2033

Village Motor Werks ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 234 S Boylan Ave, Raleigh
Phone: (919) 832-0899

Tyrolf Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Alternators & Generators-Automotive Repairing
Address: 7513 Knightdale Blvd, Knightdale
Phone: (919) 217-5621

Turner Towing & Recovery ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: Rougemont
Phone: (919) 219-9096

Triangle Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 3511 Nc 55 Hwy, Apex
Phone: (919) 467-1376

Auto blog

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.

IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving

Tue, Oct 11 2022

WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.

GM slashes prices in China as sales falter

Thu, May 14 2015

Buying a vehicle from General Motors' stable of brands might be a lot cheaper in the near future – at least for customers in China. The effort comes as GM hopes to keep sales there growing, and the decision alludes to yet another sign that the Asian country no longer has the booming auto market of past years. GM and its Chinese joint venture partner SAIC are slashing prices by as much as the equivalent to $8,700 on 40 models from Buick, Chevrolet, and Cadillac, according to The Detroit News. Across all of automaker's nameplates, the overall sales dipped in China in April by 0.4 percent to 258,484 vehicles. Among the drops, Buick was down 8.5 percent, and Chevy shrunk 5.6 percent. Caddy's numbers increased 4.6 percent for the month, though. Buick remains a popular brand in the minds of Chinese consumers, but according to The Detroit News domestic automakers there are starting to eat into the dominance of foreign companies in the market. The country remains important for GM, though. Late last year, it outlined a future strategy that included China as a major pillar, including a $14 billion investment to build five new factories and boost sales. News Source: The Detroit NewsImage Credit: Alexander F. Yuan / AP Photo Buick Cadillac Chevrolet GM Car Buying Car Dealers saic