2010 Colorado Clean Low Miles!!!! on 2040-cars
Battle Creek, Michigan, United States
Engine:4 cyl
Vehicle Title:Clear
Mileage: 41,200
Make: Chevrolet
Exterior Color: Silver
Model: Colorado
Interior Color: Black
Trim: Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Drive Type: 2wd
2010 Colorado. One owner. Never wrecked damaged repaired ect. Very Clean, Silver exterior Black interior. 2WD, 4 Cylinder engine, gets 28 mpg on the highway due to the 4 SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION. Has ice cold air, Cruise, tilt wheel, intermittent wipers, AM/FM/CD stereo, Reese hitch. This is a REGULAR cab, NOT extended... with a 6 1/2 foot bed. INCLUDED but not shown, is a folding hard tonneau cover. I will get a pic downloaded. This truck just turned over 41,000 miles. Runs like new. Never any issues with this truck. If you can live without an extended cab, and just want a very reliable, nice clean, never any rust, economical truck... this is it. This was a Texas truck until this spring. ITS NEVER SEEN SNOW. Questions? 269 223 2763. NOTE: This is a used vehicle, I am NOT a dealer, NO WARRANTY written or Implied. Truck is now in Michigan 49017.
Chevrolet Colorado for Sale
- 2008 chevy colorado service utility truck 88k-miles cleann(US $16,990.00)
- 2008 chevy colorado brand fx fiberglass service utility 1-owner(US $11,990.00)
- 2012 chevrolet colorado lt crew cab pickup 4-door 3.7l
- 2012 white 2wd reg cab work truck!
- Z71 colorado campershell crew cab tow package pre-owned one owner
- 2005 chevrolet colorado z71 ls crew cab pickup 4-door 3.5l(US $13,000.00)
Auto Services in Michigan
Village Automotive Repair ★★★★★
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Unique Auto Care ★★★★★
Toledo Sign Co Inc ★★★★★
Tim Leslie Auto & Truck Svc ★★★★★
The Collision Shop ★★★★★
Auto blog
Next-gen Chevy Volt gets Corvette looks, adjustable regen levels
Sat, Dec 20 2014The hood may say "full speed ahead." The regenerative braking system says "slow down a bit." One person's automotive improvements is another's identity crisis, all in a day's work analyzing the new Chevrolet Volt. The next-generation version of General Motors' first extended-range plug in will include design touches taken from to the new Chevrolet Corvette, GM's iconic sports car. Hexagonal taillights and a "taut" hood will be part of the new package, Automotive News says, citing General Motors design chief Ed Wilbur. But does that mean the Volt is shedding any of its green-car cred? Not at all, if one considers that the Volt will also let the driver adjust the degree of regenerative braking using steering-wheel paddles to dial up and recapture as much energy as possible and engage in "one-pedal" driving or turn it down for easier coasting. Check out the 55-second video below featuring GM executives Mark Reuss and Andrew Farah trying out the Volt's new regenerative-braking system that was first used on the Cadillac ELR. GM will have more details for us when it unveils the 2016 Chevy Volt at the North American Auto Show in Detroit next month. The new version is said to have a larger battery, a longer all-electric driving range and more power, but Chevy's been fairly mum on those sorts of performance details so far. Green Chevrolet Electric volt cadillac elr corvette regenerative braking
Watch this creative way to pull a truck's engine
Fri, 08 Mar 2013Living in an apartment complex has its benefits, but for shade-tree mechanics who like/need to work on their own cars, it definitely has a number of disadvantages. Relatively simple tasks such as brake jobs and oil changes are difficult when you don't have dedicated driveway space, to say nothing of more in-depth repairs... like pulling an engine, for example.
For these types of challenges, a little ingenuity and plenty of muscle are needed to get the job done. Scroll down to watch these four men snatch the V8 out of a Chevrolet K1500 using nothing but a chain, landscape timber and good ol' fashioned brute strength. Good work, gentlemen.
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.