Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1978 Chevrolet K5 Cheyenne Blazer Custom Deluxe Sport Utility 2-door 5.7l on 2040-cars

Year:1978 Mileage:30077 Color: Brown /
 Brown
Location:

Grants Pass, Oregon, United States

Grants Pass, Oregon, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sport Utility
Engine:V8 350
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Blazer
Trim: Cheyenne
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 4X4 Auto
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Mileage: 30,077
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Brown
Interior Color: Brown
Number of Cylinders: 8
Year: 1978
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

A 1978 Chevrolet Cheyenne K5 Blazer 4X4. Converted to 3/4 ton axles. 30,077 miles on a new factory 350 engine, total miles on veh. 90,077. New speedometer, rebuilt 3 speed auto transmission, tilt, p/s, p brakes, power windows/locks, cruise, a/c, Sidewinder winch, headers, Warn locking hubs, tow package, lift kit, skid plates, Panasonic am/fm cd. Vehicle runs good. Needs paint job. 3 small rust spots. See pics. We are the 2nd owner as of 1983. Please call 541-864-0682 with any ?

Buyer is responsible for pick-up or shipping at their cost.

Payment in the form of cash, money order or cashiers check. Vehicle will not be released until payment clears.

 

Auto Services in Oregon

Toy Doctor ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 19095 SW Teton Ave, Hillsboro
Phone: (503) 691-2558

Stealth Recovery and Towing ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Towing
Address: 29850 Kelso St, Coburg
Phone: (541) 688-0330

Salem Auto Body & Paint Works ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Customizing
Address: 3451 25th St SE, Independence
Phone: (503) 967-5154

S Os Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6208 NE Killingsworth St, Boring
Phone: (503) 287-8772

Russ`s Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 1590 Willamette Falls Dr, Mulino
Phone: (503) 655-2377

Real Tech Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 4380 Silverton Rd NE, Silverton
Phone: (503) 378-7976

Auto blog

Chevy Volt 'acceptable,' Nissan Leaf 'poor' in new IIHS safety tests

Thu, Jul 31 2014

Ford C-Max Hybrid also scored "acceptable" rating. With US Nissan Leaf sales up almost 30 percent during the first half of the year, the only thing that might be able to stop the battery-electric vehicle is a good, stiff barrier. Unfortunately, thing's aren't always pretty when that happens in the real world, according to new tests from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Things with the Chevrolet Volt extended-range plug-in are a little bit rosier, though. The two plug-in vehicles were part of a batch of a dozen vehicles that just went through the IIHS's "small overlap" test, in which the driver's side front corner of the vehicle is crashed into a rigid barrier at 40 miles per hour. Out of the dozen, only the Mini Cooper Countryman was given a "good" rating. Five vehicles, including the Volt and the Ford C-Max Hybrid, were rated "acceptable," two were "marginal" and two, including the Leaf, were "poor." Plug-in vehicles are unique in the crash-test context because of their relatively large battery sizes. In the Volt's case, the driver had a "low risk" of injury, said the IIHS. But the Leaf's crash substantially pushed back the instrument panel and steering column, creating a scenario where the driver was "likely" to sustain leg injuries. The batteries in both the Leaf and the Volt passed safety tests specifically targeted at things like thermo and electrical properties and overall integrity. "Nissan is proud of the Leaf's 'Good' rating in all other IIHS tests, a 4-star NCAP rating from NHTSA and its IIHS Top Safety Pick rating in all previous years since the car's release," the company said in an e-mail sent to AutoblogGreen. "As for the performance of the 2014 Leaf in the 'small overlap frontal test,' Nissan will continue to review these and other results from the IIHS 'small overlap frontal test' as we seek opportunities for improvement." Check out the IIHS's press release and small car crash-test video footage below. Range of ratings: Small car ratings run the gamut in challenging small overlap front test The Mini Cooper Countryman is the only small car to earn a good rating among the latest group of 12 cars subjected to the Institute's small overlap front crash test. Two electric models and a hybrid also are in the mix, with varied results. The electric-powered Chevrolet Volt (with a gasoline engine "range extender") earns an acceptable rating, while its battery-electric rival, the Nissan Leaf, earns a poor rating.

Leaked GM document shows GMC Sierra I6 diesel is more powerful than F-150's

Thu, Oct 4 2018

GM told us earlier this year that the 2019 GMC Sierra would be getting a 3.0-liter I6 diesel option, but it never mentioned power or fuel economy figures. Hold the phone though, because a leaked GM Canada document just showed up online that lists out the details we've been waiting for. Originally published by TFL Truck, the 3.0-liter oil-burner supposedly makes 282 horsepower and 450 pound-feet of torque. For those who are counting, that's more than the Ford F-150's 250 horsepower and 440 pound-feet from its 3.0-liter diesel. It soundly bests the 240 horsepower and 420 pound-feet of torque from Ram's 3.0-liter diesel as well. Fuel economy is another story, though. The promotional material states that it will get 28 mpg on the highway, which is 2 mpg short of the F-150's 30 mpg — mind you, it's only capable of that magical 30 mpg figure in rear-wheel drive form. There's another caveat here, too; these are numbers for Canada, so they're not exactly finalized EPA figures. However, we wouldn't expect drastic differences between the two when the American numbers come out. The leaked documents also state the diesel Sierra will be capable of towing 7,800 pounds. That number seems remarkably low when compared to the F-150, which can tow up to 11,400 pounds with its diesel. Extra power and torque would have us assume that GM could get even better numbers than Ford, so we're going to hold our final judgment for official word. A 10-speed automatic will do the shifting on the diesel, just like on the 6.2-liter V8. Since the Chevy Silverado is also expected to get this engine, we can assume the figures would be almost, if not identical, to those we see here. We recently drove the 2019 Sierra and Silverado without the diesel engines, so go check those reviews out if you'd like to know more of our thoughts on the redesigned GM trucks. Related video:

Chevy Bolt name just might get through US trademark office

Sat, May 30 2015

UPDATE: GM told AutoblogGreen on June 1 that, "Our Chevrolet Legal team has been working closely with the USPT on the Chevrolet Bolt trademark. As of last week, our legal staff received consent from Yamaha to use the Bolt name. According to our legal team, our USPT application is back to active status." Also, it appears that GM has further trademarked Bolt EV and Chevrolet Bolt EV. Chevy wants to sell a 200-mile electric vehicle for around $35,000 in a few years. The Detroit automaker wants to call that car the Bolt, not to be confused with the company's other plug-in, the Chevy Volt. Unless something changes, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is going to crush GM's Bolt-flavored dreams. The USPTO has suspended GM's trademark application. The USPTO said in its suspension that there was a "likelihood of confusion" with another Bolt trademark, No. 4429759, which applies to a Bolt trademark filed by Yamaha on August 09, 2012. That's well before GM's effort to trademark the Bolt name in 2014. GM's application will remain suspended, the USPTO said, "until the earlier-filed referenced application(s) is either registered or abandoned." Maybe GM will use this setback to respond to the many criticisms of the Bolt name we've heard since it was first announced. There is another page on the USPTO's website that says GM's Bolt application is still live, but we assume that just hasn't been updated yet. Related Video: