1972 Chevy Cheyenne Super Short Bed 4x4 Truck on 2040-cars
Tonto Basin, Arizona, United States
1972 CHEVY CHEYENNE SUPER SHORT BED 4X4 PICKUP TRUCK
350 ENGINE, 4 SPEED MANUAL TRANSMISSION, A/C, POWER STEERING, POWER BREAKS, 4" LIFT, MATCHING NUMBERS ON FRAME AND BODY, THE ENGINE I AM UNABLE TO CHECK BUT IT SHOULD BE THE ORIGINAL MOTOR AS WELL. LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT THIS TRUCK AS MUCH AS I CAN: TRUCK IS LOCATED IN ARIZONA AT MY FATHERS HOUSE WHO IS THE ONE SELLING IT...BUT IS OLD SCHOOL :) AND DON'T KNOW HOW TO ADVERTISE ON EBAY....SO HERE I AM DOING IT FOR HIM. THIS TRUCK WAS RUNNING WHEN PARKED ABOUT 10 YEARS AGO WHEN MY FATHER WANTED TO RESTORE IT. HE STARTED WITH THE BED BY TAKING IT OFF AND SANDBLASTING THE FRAME AND PAINTING IT. UNDER THE CAB HAS NOT BEEN DONE. THEN HE TOOK OUT THE STUFF IN THE CAB SO HE COULD GET THE SEAT REUPHOLSTERED...I DO NOT HAVE A PICTURE OF THE SEAT BUT IT IS INCLUDED AND STILL NEEDS TO BE REUPHOLSTERED. EVERYTHING FOR THE DASH IS INCLUDED. THERE IS A CRACK ON THE FRONT WINDOW AND THE REAR WINDOW IS OUT BUT IS INCLUDED. THERE IS ONE SPOT OF RUST SHOWN IN PICTURE ON THE LOWER CORNER OF THE CAB ON THE DRIVERS SIDE. THE MAIN DRIVE LINE AND TAILGATE IS OFF BUT DOES COME WITH THE TRUCK. THERE IS NO RUST ON FLOOR OF THE CAB AND IS VERY SOLID. THIS TRUCK DOES HAVE A SALVAGE TITLE FOR A REASON WE DO NOT KNOW. MY FATHER BOUGHT THE TRUCK WITH THE SALVAGE TITLE ABOUT 11 YEARS AGO. THIS TRUCK IS VERY HARD TO FIND AND WE ARE SAD TO SEE IT GO BUT HE IS MOVING CLOSER TO ME IN TENNESSEE AND NEEDS TO GET RID OF HIS DREAMS. :( IF YOU HAVE QUESTION AT ALL PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL MY FATHER AT 928-978-4528 IN ARIZONA. PLEASE DON'T CALL BEFORE 9AM OR AFTER 9PM. (THANK YOU SO MUCH) HE ALSO HAS A 1972 CHEVY BLAZER AS WELL.....JUST A THOUGHT!--------HE IS A BIG CHEVY FAN. WELL THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO READ MY STORY AND INFORMATION ON THIS BEAUTIFUL TRUCK AND HOPE IT GOES TO A HOME THAT WILL MAKE HER GORGEOUS ONCE AGAIN. BUYER WILL NEED TO PUT A $1,000.00 DEPOSIT WITHIN 48 HOURS AFTER THE END OF AUCTION THROUGH PAYPAL AND HAVE 10 DAYS TO PAY IN FULL WITH CASH AND TO BE PICK IT UP OR GET IT DELIVERED. (BUYERS RESPONSIBILITY) |
Chevrolet Cheyenne for Sale
1972 chevrolet cheyenne 10 short wheelbase
1978 chevy c-10 2wd pickup, one owner, very low miles, v8, auto, ac, nice shape!
1972 chevrolet c10 cheyenne super 350 cu in v8(US $22,000.00)
1994 chevy 1500 cheyenne custom paint and interior
1979 chevy k30 4x4 drw rare and very clean
1971 chevrolet truck cheyenne, short box,, fleet side, air cab
Auto Services in Arizona
Your Automotive Solution ★★★★★
White`s Integrity Auto Ctr ★★★★★
Wheeler Glass Inc ★★★★★
Tucson Independant Muffler Super Car Center ★★★★★
TechPlus Automotive ★★★★★
Super Discount Transmissions ★★★★★
Auto blog
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.
Frustrated GM investors ask what more Mary Barra can do
Mon, Oct 22 2018DETROIT — General Motors Co Chief Executive Mary Barra has transformed the No. 1 U.S. automaker in her almost five years in charge, but that is still not enough to satisfy investors. Ahead of third-quarter results due on Oct. 31, GM shares are trading about 6 percent below the $33 per share price at which they launched in 2010 in a post-bankruptcy initial public offering. The Detroit carmaker's stock is down 22 percent since Barra took over in January 2014. After hitting an all-time high of $46.48 on Oct. 24, 2017, the shares have declined 33 percent. In the same period, the Standard & Poor's 500 index has climbed 7.8 percent. Several shareholders contacted by Reuters said GM could face a third major action by activist shareholders in less than four years if the share price does not improve. "I've been expecting it," said John Levin, chairman of Levin Capital Strategies. "It just seems a tempting morsel to somebody." Levin's firm owns more than seven million GM shares. Barra has guided the company through the settlement of a federal criminal probe of a mishandled safety recall, sold off money-losing European operations, and returned $25 billion to shareholders through dividends and stock buybacks from 2012 through 2017. GM declined to comment for this story, but the company's executives privately express frustration with the market's reluctance to see it as anything more than a manufacturer tied mainly to auto market sales cycles. GM's profitable North American truck and SUV business and its money-making China operations are valued at just $14 billion, excluding the value of GM's stake in its $14.6 billion Cruise automated vehicle business and its cash reserves from its $44 billion market capitalization. The recent slump in the Chinese market, GM's largest, and plateauing U.S. demand are ratcheting up the pressure. GM is one of the few global automakers without a founding family or a government to serve as a bulwark against corporate raiders. In 2015, a group led by investor Harry Wilson pressed GM to launch a $5 billion share buyback, and commit to what is now an $18 billion ceiling on the level of cash the company would hold. In 2017, GM fended off a call by hedge fund manager David Einhorn to split its common stock shares into two classes. Einhorn, whose firm still owned more than 21 million shares at the end of June, declined to comment about GM's stock price. Other investors said there were no clear alternatives to Barra's approach.
GM recalls 83,572 SUVs for ignition switch issue
Sun, Jan 4 2015General Motors is recalling 83,572 SUVs from the 2011 and 2012 model years over a potential ignition lock actuator issue. In affected vehicles, the actuator isn't the right size, which could cause the ignition to get stuck in the "Start" position, and then either due to a jarring event or a "cool interior temperature" the ignition could switch back to the "Accessory" position. Doing so would cause a loss of power assistance and the airbags might not deploy. This is a different ignition issue than the one that's been ongoing for the past year. GM said it expects that less than 500 vehicles suffer from the problem, but that the pool could include vehicles from 2007 through to 2014 that have already been fixed, but with defective parts. The 2011-2012 SUVs included in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration notice: Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, Escalade EXT, Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado HD, Silverado LD, Suburban, Tahoe, GMC Sierra LD, Sierra HD, Yukon, and Yukon XL vehicles. GM will notify owners and dealers will inspect the ignition lock housing to see if it needs a free replacement. RECALL Subject : Ignition Lock Actuator may Bind Report Receipt Date: DEC 30, 2014 NHTSA Campaign Number: 14V827000 Component(s): ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Manufacturer: General Motors LLC SUMMARY: General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, Escalade EXT, Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado HD, Silverado LD, Suburban, Tahoe, GMC Sierra LD, Sierra HD, Yukon, and Yukon XL vehicles. In the affected vehicles, the ignition lock actuator may bind, making turning the key difficult or causing the ignition to get stuck in the "Start" position. CONSEQUENCE: If stuck in the "Start" position, the ignition may suddenly snap back into the "Accessory" position, causing a loss of engine, steering, and braking power, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. If the vehicle is in a crash, the air bags may not deploy, increasing the risk of occupant injury. REMEDY: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace the ignition lock housing, as necessary, free of charge. The manufacturer has not yet provided a notification schedule. Owners may contact GM customer service at 1-800-458-8006 (Cadillac), 1-800-222-1020 (Chevrolet), or 1-800-462-8782 (GMC). GM's number for this recall is 14696 for the original equipment, and 14912 for the service replacement parts.