Very Rare 1968 True Ss Chevelle Convertible, 5 Year Restore,4spd, 12bolt Posi on 2040-cars
Spokane, Washington, United States
Engine:396 ci big block
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Interior Color: Black
Make: Chevrolet
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Chevelle
Trim: ss convertible
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: rwd
Options: Cassette Player, Convertible
Mileage: 15,150
Exterior Color: Red
you are bidding on a VERY RARE 1968 true ss big block, factory 4speed, 12 bolt posi ..138 vin!! chevelle convertible!!! this was a frame off, 5 year restore that is beautiful and drives wonderful..this is #327 of 2286 ever made!!! out of all the research i have done there are less then 1200 around!!! this is a matching # 4spd/ 12 bolt car!!! the engine is a 396 non matching # that has been rebuilt and bored with 10.5:1 forged pistons, port and polished 96cc iron heads,roller rockers, comp hyd xtreme cam ( 552 intake/555 exhaust)...edelbrock performance intake,...holley 4150 hp 750 carb....hedman headers...malory unilite dist..crane fireball 6cd ignition w/ rev limiter...vacuum reserve system!!...FRAME...urethane body bushings,.new polyurethane front and rear bushings...boxed control arms..high performance front and rear sway bars (quickor suspension)....2" low profile springs ( quickor)...monroe 3 stage gas shocks......front disk brakes...new brake booster...DRIVETRAIN>>> muncie m21 4spd trans....hurst competetion/plus shifter.....center force clutch.......12 bolt 3,55 posi rearend....BODY.....ppg 1997 torch red..ghost stripe 1997 bright red...INTERIOR>>>>all new by abc quick stitch..the top is also new ...everything has been powder coated, the underside is also show quality!!! has 3" flow masters out the back!!! this is truly a chevelle collectors chance at a hard to find true ss big block 4 spd 12 bolt car, with power steering/brakes, it is a joy to drive! i run this beautiful car on sunny days only and will not heat up over 190deg! car has won many awards, and not another one at the shows..this car is show quality top and bottom, although it is driven/ not trailer queen there are very few/ very minor touch ups...all lights/gauges work as they should...the door buzzer even wrks when door is open (remember those?)..all light switches/ heater/ wipers w/ window juice work also!..dont miss out on this rare find...the nada book on this car is over 80k..my reserve is very low for this rare car..bid with confidence, and have funds ready,...if you have 0 feedback plse message me first!
On Aug-18-13 at 20:51:14 PDT, seller added the following information:i also have picts of the frame off and others..if you need more just ask
Chevrolet Chevelle for Sale
Auto Services in Washington
Xtreme Car Audio & Tint ★★★★★
West Seattle Brake Service ★★★★★
United Battery Systems Inc ★★★★★
Skys Auto Repair & Detailing ★★★★★
Setina Manufacturing Co. ★★★★★
Salvage Yard Guru ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM won't sell 2014 Chevrolet SS in Canada
Thu, 21 Feb 2013Allow us to be the first to extend our condolences to our friends to the north. General Motors has announced the 2014 Chevrolet SS will not be available in Canada. The Globe and Mail reports the automaker has confirmed the high-performance sedan won't hit Canadian dealers, though GM hasn't offered up any reasoning as to why that is.
Buyers here in the US of A, meanwhile, can look forward to getting their hands on the 415-horspower, rear-wheel drive SS by late summer. Something tells us it won't be long after that before Canadian officials start seeing individually imported 6.2-liter V8 four-doors in their neighborhoods. Fortunately, Canadian buyers will still be able to take home the 2014 Chevrolet Corvette. The C7 bowed at the Canadian International Auto Show last week, reportedly drawing sizable crowds and interest.
IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving
Tue, Oct 11 2022WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.