Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Chevrolet Chevelle Ss on 2040-cars

US $18,000.00
Year:1966 Mileage:34700 Color: Black
Location:

Minnetonka, Minnesota, United States

Minnetonka, Minnesota, United States
Advertising:

Factory Documentation includes: Original Factory Build Sheet - found inside the car Original Factory Protect-O-Plate Original Factory Warranty Manual Original Owners Manual Original Owners Manual Plastic Sleeve Original Chevrolet Custom Feature Accessory Book from 1966 Original L.B. Knight Motor Co. Lubrication Dealer Reminder Original L.B. Knight Motor Co. Paper Glove Box Holder Original Key Numbers with Keys Copies of Titles with the Owners and Documented Mileage Receipts Old Factory Part Option Stickers that came off the springs, shocks, etc. when built Snap On Calendar featuring this SS Documented Display Sign, etc. This is an exceptional opportunity to invest in a low mileage SS Chevelle with full paperwork documenting it's provenance. Paperwork is everything! Tuxedo Black (AA) with an original Ivory interior (798) that is near mint, 396 V8 325 HP, PS, PB, Factory Four Season Air Conditioning, Front and Rear Bumper Guards, 12 Bolt Factory Rear End with 3:31 Ratio, Tinted Glass 61 Amp Generator, Dual Exhaust, H.D. Battery, Factory Clock in dash, Factory Delco Push Button AM Radio, Traffic hazard Warning Switch, Rear Mounted Antenna, etc. All the original spot welds are in place for the quarter panels, rockers, etc......all original sheet metal! The correct T3 headlights are present and the turn signals, headlights, wipers and radio are all in working order. Correct tar top battery, Spiral Shocks, Four Brand New Firestone Red Line Tires...... plus a brand new set of Hurst Accessory Wheels have been installed. Inspection markings and part number stickers have all been re-installed! NADA Classic Car Value Guide for 2015 estimates a #1 SS396 at $63,000 with out any addition for the low mileage or Hurst Accessory Wheels. Any questions, please email me! Thank You.

Auto Services in Minnesota

Victory Auto Service & Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 16326 Highway 65 NE, East-Bethel
Phone: (763) 780-1002

Ultimate Car Care ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 5641 Blackburn Ln, Afton
Phone: (651) 450-4426

Tom Kadlec Honda ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4444 Highway 52 N, Pine-Island
Phone: (507) 322-3069

Svs Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2231 W Superior St, Cloquet
Phone: (218) 729-4788

Sherlox ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Glass-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 1417 4th St SE, Vadnais-Heights
Phone: (612) 353-6596

Plush Used Cars & Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automobile Transporters
Address: Almelund
Phone: (706) 321-5579

Auto blog

Weekly Recap: Tesla loses money, still dominates the news

Sat, Aug 8 2015

Some people get an inordinate amount of attention. In politics, it's Donald Trump. In football, it's Jim Harbaugh. And in the auto world, it's Elon Musk and his always-fascinating electric car company, Tesla Motors. General Motors is spending $877 million to upgrade a factory. So what! US auto sales are up. Who cares? Tesla has a metal snake that will recharge your car! So was the week in Tesla – er, the industry. Snarkiness aside, Tesla did dominate the news cycle, led by the announcement the company lost $184 million in the second quarter. Tesla also said it expects to deliver between 50,000 and 55,000 vehicles this year, and is preparing for a full launch of the Model X crossover in September. Musk also made news during the earnings call by simply not answering a question about ride sharing, leading to speculation Tesla could be considering its own operation. While the financials were the arguably the most important company news, reports of a Model S cyber hacking were more compelling fodder for Tesla followers. Researchers were able to attack the sedan and bring it to a stop, though they required access to the car first. Tesla says it already has deployed a remedy for the situation. On a lighter note, Tesla published a video of its metal charger prototype that autonomously uncoils like a snake to power up the company's vehicles, provoking plenty of humorous comments and comparisons. Watch it and decide for yourself. While some of this might seem trivial, much of Tesla's recent attention has been warranted. It's the first startup US automaker in decades to launch from nothing and actually gain traction in the market. Sure, Musk is a lightning rod and Tesla always seems to be in the spotlight. But amid all of the publicity, it easy to lose sight of the new reality: Tesla is a force. OTHER NEWS & NOTES 2016 Chevy Volt lights up 106 MPGe The Chevy Volt's vitals are looking healthier for 2016. The second-generation plug-in hybrid racks up a gaudy 106 miles per gallon equivalent, which is an increase of eight MPGe from the 2015 model. The new Volt can travel 53 miles on electricity, a significant jump from the 2015 Volt's 38-mile range. The new car also has a 420-mile total range when factoring in the capability of the gasoline engine, which is 40 miles greater than the current car offers.

How real is the Chevy Bolt EV and will it really cost $30,000?

Tue, Jan 13 2015

"This is us bragging that we can do this kind of car." That's how Michael Simcoe, GM's executive director for NA exteriors, described the Chevy Bolt EV concept, which made a surprise appearance at the Detroit Auto Show today. While there was talk of a 2017 production debut, this is for sure a concept vehicle. But that means the ideas behind the vehicle are perhaps more important than the details. For example, no one is talking about what size battery might appear in a production Bolt, but Simcoe would talk about how rapid progress in battery improvements made it possible for GM to make the bold Bolt declaration that promises 200 miles and a price tag of around $30,000 (after incentives). But if the Bolt makes it to market, it won't be until 2017 (as rumored) or later, is it really fair to promote the car as being available with a federal tax credit? For one thing, credits for plug-in vehicles may change in the next few years, but if the laws stay the same, each manufacturer is limited to 200,000 vehicles before the credits start to decline. GM is justifiably proud that it's sold over 70,000 Volts thus far, but with a new model coming out later this year and a few years to go until the Bolt potentially arrives, GM could be pushing right up against that 200,000 limit when the Bolt goes on sale. But Volt executive chief engineer Pam Fletcher told AutoblogGreen that, "We're just trying to take some of the confusion out." "Think about talking to the average consumer," she said. "First, going through the explanation of how the federal tax credit was set up, how it's being used and so on. [In the industry, we] have the luxury of understanding the nuances of that regulation, but right now people who aren't in the marketplace, they don't have the luxury of all that. It's already hard to communicate the details so we gave them data in a way that is what they're used to seeing." There was one question that drove the two-year Bolt gestation and design period, Simcoe said: What does a better battery offer a vehicle designer? "We've got a number of spaces we play in for powertrain technology and obviously electrification is one of them," he said. "With Volt 1 and then the Spark EV, with that development and batteries getting better for us, we started doing some practical packaging to deliver a vehicle which was not the traditional aero form which you see around electric vehicles.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.