Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1971 Chevrolet Chevelle Restored Frame Off Show Car on 2040-cars

Year:1971 Mileage:0 Color: Burgundy /
 Burgundy
Location:

Plymouth, Michigan, United States

Plymouth, Michigan, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 136371K232698
Year: 1971
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Chevelle
Warranty: No Warranty Remaining
Mileage: 0
Interior Color: Burgundy
VIN: 136371K232698
Number of Cylinders: 8 Cylinder

Auto Services in Michigan

Z Tire Center Of Grand Haven ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 17278 Robbins Rd, West-Olive
Phone: (616) 846-1600

Williams Volkswagon & Audi ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2845 E Saginaw St, Haslett
Phone: (517) 484-1341

Warren Auto Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 6330 W Warren Ave, Ecorse
Phone: (313) 361-7417

Warehouse Tire Stop ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 1100 Cesar E Chavez Ave, Clyde
Phone: (248) 332-4120

Van Dam Auto Sales & Leasing ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 2050 112th Ave, Hamilton
Phone: (616) 392-5008

Uncle Ed`s Oil Shoppe ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 3715 Stadium Dr, Kendall
Phone: (269) 372-3281

Auto blog

Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]

Tue, 05 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.

Chevy Volt replacement battery cost varies wildly, up to $34,000

Fri, Jan 10 2014

There's a growing hubbub in the plug-in vehicle community over what looks like some ridiculously cheap replacement batteries for the Chevrolet Volt going up for sale. GM Parts Online, for example, is selling a replacement Volt battery with an MSRP of $2,994.64 but, with an online discount, the price comes down to $2,305.88. For the 16-kWh pack in the 2012 Volt, that comes to a very low $144.11 per kilowatt hour (kWH). But is it a real deal? How can it be, when a Chevy dealer may quote you a price of up to $34,000 to replace the pack? For a 16-kWh Volt pack, $2,305.88 comes to a very low $144.11 per kWh. But is it a real deal? Battery packs in alternative propulsion vehicles are usually priced by the kWh and, historically, they've been thought to be in the range of $500-per-kWh for OEM offerings. Since automakers are understandably secretive about their costs, we still don't know what the real number is today, but we do know it varies by automaker. Tesla, for example, has said it pays less than $200-per-kWH at the cell level but, of course, a constructed pack would be more. Whatever is going on, li-ion battery prices are trending downward. So, $144.11 certainly sounds great, but what's the story here? Kevin Kelly, manager of electrification technology communications for General Motors, reminded AutoblogGreen that GM Parts Online is not the official GM parts website and that, "the costs indicated on the site are not what we would charge our dealers or owners for a replacement battery. There would be no cost to the Volt owner if their battery needs replacement or repair while the battery is under the eight year/100,000 mile limited warranty coverage provided by Chevrolet." A single price tag also can't be accurate for everyone, Kelly said. "If the customer needs to have their battery repaired beyond the warranty, the cost to them would vary depending on what needs to be replaced or repaired (i.e. number of modules, which specific internal components need replacement, etc.)." he said. "So, it's hard for us to tell you exactly what the cost would be to the customer because it varies depending on what might need to be repaired/replaced. As a result, the core charge would vary." But, is the $2,300 price even accurate for anyone? Thanks to a reader comment, we see that this similar item on New GM Parts makes it look like the lithium-ion modules that Kelly mentioned – where a lot of the expensive bits are – are not included.

GM already raising prices on 2014 Silverado and Sierra pickups

Mon, 14 Oct 2013

General Motors must be pretty pleased with sales of its two newest pickups, the GMC Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado, as it's announced price hikes for both models, as part of a planned price tweak.
Prices will be bumped by as much as $1,500, although weirdly, they'll be offset by as much as $1,500 in cash-back offers through the end of October. Fox Business reports that GM spokesman Jim Cain said of the price hike, "With the sell down of the '13 models nearly complete, this price adjustment was planned and is a normal part of business."
The move, as Fox is quick to point out, is an interesting one, as sales of the twin pickups struggled last month relative to the Ford F-Series, while both of GM's crosstown competitors have been aggressively undercutting Silverado and Sierra prices. The F-150 starts at $24,070 and the Ram 1500 comes in at $23,600, not counting any cash on the hood. A base Silverado, meanwhile, retails at $25,575.