Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1970 Chevelle Ss 396 Big Block Numbers Matching With Build Sheet Just Restored on 2040-cars

Year:1970 Mileage:354
Location:

Muskegon, Michigan, United States

Muskegon, Michigan, United States
Advertising:

This 1970 Chevelle SS is in absolute perfect condition it had a frame off restoration under 1000 miles ago. Numbers matching and the whole car is perfect from top to bottom. If you are looking for a Chevelle that is show quality then stop looking this is it the value of this car will only go up. The car needs nothing the only changes I made to the car is a updated set of 17'' Stock like SS wheels from yearone with new BFG radial tires (I also have the stock rims and tires as well) Also I just installed 4 new Hotchkis fox performance shocks and 2'' lowering spring in the front.Those items make the car drive absolutely amazing. (Also have stock shocks and springs) Those items are the only things that are not stock on the car but all those can be removed if you want it 100% original.  The car runs and drives fantastic I would not hesitate to drive it across country other than taken a chance of getting a stone chip. This 1970 SS is a true barn find it was in a barn from 1979 until 2007 when it was restored with 94,000 miles. This SS is very original and has not been hacked it has it all the original drive train and all the numbers match I am confident you won't find a cleaner car for the money.

Engine #s: T1112CTX  (CTX is code for 396/4-speed)
104150966 (Partial vin stamped on block)
Trans: 3925661 (cast)
P0A05A (stamped)  (Muncie (P), 1970 (0), January 5 (A05), M20 (A)
Diff (12 bolt): GM51
3969278NF ( casting number for center section used from 70-72)

 


This car is show quality and VERY clean please feel free to call text or email any questions, info or other pictures you may need sorry if I missed anything 616-293-2217 If you are a out of state or out of country buyer I can help with shipping I am very knowledgeable about that side of things so call or text me616-293-2217 anytime.

Sorry if you were biding on it before but I was finally able to get better quality pictures. 

 

 

Auto Services in Michigan

Village Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 31470 Mound Rd, Grosse-Pointe
Phone: (586) 275-2777

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 20827 John R Rd, Ecorse
Phone: (248) 547-4114

Unique Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 10301 W 8 Mile Rd, Washington-Township
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Toledo Sign Co Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Signs-Maintenance & Repair
Address: 2021 Adams St, Lambertville
Phone: (419) 244-4444

Tim Leslie Auto & Truck Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 221 Northbound Gratiot Ave, New-Baltimore
Phone: (586) 463-3990

The Collision Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 510 E Maple Rd, Harrison-Township
Phone: (248) 589-3280

Auto blog

GM admits goal of 500,000 EVs by 2017 won't be met

Sat, May 9 2015

After a little over four years of Chevy Volt sales, General Motors has a better handle on how many people it expects will buy cars with plugs. And it's less than the company thought back in 2012, when then-senior vice president of global product development, Mary Barra, said that GM expected to sell 500,000 "vehicles with electrification" by 2017. In a sustainability report released this week, GM says that half-million vehicle target will not be met but that it still, "believes the future is electric." In the report, GM says that, "For our commitment to electrification, our forecasted outlook currently projects us, along with the broader automotive industry, falling short of expectations for 2017. ... We continue to aspire to our stated goal." GM's electric lineup includes the Volt, the recently popular Spark EV, the slow-selling Cadillac ELR and upcoming Malibu Hybrid, CT6 plug-in hybrid and eAssist technology in the Buick LaCrosse and Regal. GM says it has 180,834 electrified vehicles on the road in the US today. In 2013, it had 153,034; 95,578 in 2012, and 39,843 in 2011. The company's next big plug-in vehicle will be the second-gen Chevy Volt, which is coming to market later this year, followed by the 200-mile Bolt EV coming, we think, in 2017. GM Employees on Mission to Transform Transportation Sustainability report outlines vehicle and manufacturing progress; sets new targets 2015-05-07 DETROIT – General Motors' just-released sustainability report chronicles efforts by the company's 216,000 employees to live out GM's newly defined purpose and values by earning customer loyalty, applying meaningful technology advances and improving the communities where it does business. These actions – led by CEO Mary Barra – further drive sustainability into the company's culture through building safer and smarter vehicles with less environmental impact. "GM will take a leading role in the auto industry's transformation as it undergoes an unprecedented period of change," said Bob Ferguson, senior vice president, GM Global Public Policy. "From GM's labs to its assembly lines, our people are driving the world to a better place through improved mobility." The company believes the future is electric, with billions of investment to support an all-in-house approach to the development and manufacturing of electrified vehicles. It now counts 180,834 on the road in the U.S – up from 153,034 in 2013.

General Motors CEO Provides Few Details In Appearance Before Congress

Wed, Apr 2 2014

It was only two months ago that Mary Barra, freshly crowned as the new General Motors chief executive officer, visited Washington DC as an esteemed guest of First Lady Michelle Obama for the State of the Union address. On Tuesday, Barra returned to the Capitol under more strained circumstances. For more than two contentious hours, she took questions from members of a House of Representatives subcommittee investigating General Motors years-long delay in initiating a recall of millions of vehicles that contained a defect that has killed at least 13 people. Why did GM accept faulty ignition switches that were below the company's set specfications? Why did GM learn about the problem in 2001 yet take no action until 2014? Will GM compensate victims' families even though the company's bankruptcy may limit its liability? Those were a few of the questions members of the House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee asked. Few concrete answers were forthcoming. For her part, Barra sidestepped most of the questions, saying she wouldn't have information needed to answer them until an internal review is completed. David Friedman, the administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, testified after Barra. The biggest news that emerged from the hearing was that General Motors has retained attorney Kenneth Feinberg to advise the company on its civil and legal responsibilities. He has made a career of resolving disputes and serving in a 'fixer' role, serving as the chief of the federal government's September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, as an administrator of compensation fund for victims of the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster and a similar fund for victims of the Boston Marathon bombing. Barra, who has been GM's CEO since January but been with the company since 1980, expects to meet with Feinberg on Friday, and have a concrete plan within the next 30-60 days. Yet Barra would not say for certain Tuesday that GM would compensate the victims at all. Despite repeated questions from Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Barra did not outline the company's intentions. "I assume GM is hiring (Feinberg) to help identify the size of claims and then compensate the victims? Is that right," DeGette asked. "Is GM willing to put together some kind of a compensation fund for these victims that Mr. Feinberg will then administer?" "We've hired him to help assess the situation," Barra replied. "So really, there's no money involved at this point," DeGette asked.

Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout

Tue, Nov 25 2014

Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.