Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1970 Chevelle Ls5 Ss454 Red, 4-speed, Born-with Engine, Diff, Docs, Road Ready on 2040-cars

US $70,000.00
Year:1970 Mileage:32186 Color: paint code of
Location:

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Advertising:

We own and operate a Restoration Shop located in Scottsdale, Arizona. We performed the partial restoration described below. We are selling this vehicle for our customer.  We welcome any questions and inquiries you may have. This vehicle is available to interested parties for test drives. A hoist is available at our shop if you wish to examine the undercarriage of this vehicle. 

Our justification of this vehicle's price is the following:

  1. Vehicle is truly "numbers matching" i.e., the engine, differential, sheet metal, VIN tag, Cowl tag are close items installed by GM when vehicle was assembled at the Atlanta Georgia Assembly Plant. 
  2. This was vehicle was not a rusty or wrecked hulk prior to restoration. Digital photos we have document the condition of the inside of the original doors, quarters, floor, cowl, etc. 
  3. The original Protecto-Plate is present. It documents the VIN number, engine, transmission and differential code, and also the selling dealer and date the vehicle was sold new. Sorry, we do not have a build sheet or prior owner history. 
  4. The vehicle is totally restored correctly and is fully operational. This vehicle is no longer just an auction car that looks good at first glance, and nothing else. 
  5. Quality and completeness of restoration is documented by over 500 high definition digital photos, and detailed billing statements describing completeness of all work done. 

Concerning the possibility that this vehicle is an SS clone because there is no build sheet with it. We believe this is not a possibility because of the following:

  1. Engine block stamp area has not been altered, machined or stamped since vehicle left factory. We examined block after it had been disassembled for rebuild, hot-tanked and cleaned by our engine builder. We could not detect any alternations
  2. ID code on block is correct from a 1970 LS5 360-454 engine equipped with a four speed transmission. 
  3. VIN on block, “10A155972 matches VIN number of dash and cowl, "36370A155972."
  4. VIN tag on dash and cowl is unaltered and attached to body with original rivets that appear to be unaltered and original to vehicle. We have high definition photos of the rivets attaching the VIN tag to cowl.
  5. Protecto plate, in our opinion, is an original, not a reproduction that has been aged in a microwave, etc. The protecto-plate verifies the VIN number, engine ID code, etc. 
  6. These issues and the fact that tie vehicle is not a more valuable LS6, 1967 435-427 Corvette, etc. give us a high level of confidence the vehicle is not clone.
  7. If we had full owner history on the vehicle, which we do not, there would be no possibility of cloning, other monkey- business and unethical behavior as it relates to this vehicle. 

1970 Chevrolet LS5 SS454 Chevelle, VIN #136370A155972, Cranberry Red with Black Stripes Exterior, equipped with:

  1. Black Bucket Seat Interior with Console
  2. Cowl Induction Hood, Stripes 
  3. LS5 454-360 engine, original to vehicle
  4. M20 Muncie Four Speed Transmission. Vehicle should be equipped with an M-22 Muncie Four Speed Transmission. The transmission currenttly in the vehicle is not the original installed by the factory.
  5. 3.31 Positraction differential, original to vehicle
  6. Factory 3-Spoke cushion steering wheel,
  7. Factory gauges and tach,
  8. Factory original AM/FM radio
  9. LS5 standard equipment such as PDB, PS, F41 Suspension, 12 Bolt Differential, Five Spoke Wheels, Firestone F70 X 14 Wide Oval Raised White Letter Tires.
  10. Floor mats, front and rear

The body-off restoration was completed in late 2010; prior to the current owner purchasing it at the Mecum Kissimmee Florida auction in January 2011 for $65,000.00. . Vehicle's painted surfaces was stripped and refinished with high quality materials to a standard much better than original. We did not perform the 2010 restoration on the vehicle. It is our understanding that it was performed by the seller. 

 Since early 2011, $41,300.00 was invested in a complete mechanical rebuild, partial restoration to correct OEM standards and operations dial-in which was completed in early 2012. The original engine and transmission have been completely rebuilt. As have all other components needing attention to be 100% correct or operational. 525 digital photos have been taken of vehicle before, during and since its 2011-2012 partial restoration. All billing statements are available for serious buyers to examine.

 Vehicle has been driven 500 miles so then.

 Vehicle has all original sheet metal with exception of RR quarter, inner panel, at trunk drop-off. Digital photos are available to document condition of inside of doors, window and back window areas, quarters, top and bottom of floors, inside of fenders etc.

 Vehicle has its “Born with” engine block, cylinder heads, intake manifold, differential, cowl tag and VIN tag.

 Factory documentation is the original Protecto-Plate provided to original owner when vehicle was sold new in Greenville SC on June 28, 1970.

  1. Originality:
  1. This vehicle’s engine block, cylinder heads and intake manifold are the original items installed by the General Motors factory when it was assembled.
    1. The block’s casting number located on the LR bell housing flange is #3963512. This the correct original block casting number for all 1970 454 CID engines
    2. The block’s casting date located on the RR bell housing flange is “C 10-70” or March 10, 1970. The casting date of the block precedes the engine build date of March 30, 1970.
    3. The engine block’s build date and ID Code stamped on the horizontal flange in front of the right cylinder head is “T0330CRT”. This means the engine was assembled March 30, 1970 and was installed in a 1970 LS5 Chevelle equipped with four-speed transmission.

                                                   i.     This engine’s build date and ID info are same data listed on this Vehicle’s Protecto-Plate.

    1. The engine block’s VIN number stamped on the horizontal flange in front of the right cylinder head is “10A155972”.

                                                     i.     The stamping and casting number on this engine are consistent will other original, unaltered engines we have inspected and are sure are not re-stamps.

                                                    ii.     The broach marks located on pad where the engine’s build date, ID code and VIN number are original and are consistent with unaltered engines we have inspected and are sure are not re-stamps.

    1. The both cylinder heads have a casting number of 3964290# stamped in the top middle surface of both heads.

                                                     i.     This is the correct original cylinder head casting number for all 1970 396-454 non-L78-LS6 CID engines

    1. The both cylinder heads have a casting date of “J 21 69” (October 21, 1969) stamped in the top middle surface of both heads.

                                                     i.     The casting date of the cylinder heads precedes the engine build date of March 30, 1970.

    1. The intake manifold’s casting number located on the center top of the manifold behind the carb is #39556287.

                                                     i.     This is the correct original block casting number for all 1970 454 CID engines

    1. The intake manifold’s casting date located on the center top of the manifold behind the carb is “A 29-70” or January 29, 1970.

                                                     i.     The casting date on the intake manifold precedes the engine build date of March 30, 1970.

  1. It is our opinion that this vehicle’s differential is the original item installed by the General Motors factory when it was assembled.

a.        The differential’s casting date located on the back of the diff housing is “C 5-70” or March 5, 1970. The casting date of the diff precedes the body assembly build date of fifth week of April 1970.

                                                     i.     The differential ID Code and Build date are consistent with the same data listed on this vehicle’s Protecto-Plate.

b.      The differential’s ID code and assembly date located on the front of the LH diff tube is “CRV0408B”. “CRV” denote this differential is a 3.31 Pos. “0408” denotes this differential was assembled on April 8, 1970.

                                                     i.     The differential ID Code and Build date are consistent with the same data listed on this vehicle’s Protecto-Plate.

                                                    ii.     Build date of differential is consistent with the body assembly date of fifth week of April 1970.

  1.  It is our opinion that this vehicle’s transmission is NOT the original item installed by the General Motors factory when it was assembled.

a.      The transmission main case casting number is #39254660.

                                                     i.     This is the correct original casting number for all Muncie Four Speed Transmissions installed in 1970 Chevelles.

b.      The transmission tail shaft casting number is #3857584.

                                                     i.     This is NOT the correct original casting number for all Muncie Four Speed Transmissions installed in 1970 Chevelles equipped the LS5 454-360 Engine. The correct casting number is 3952648.

c.       The transmission side cover casting number is #3952648.

                                                     i.     This is the correct original casting number for all Muncie Four Speed Transmission installed in 1970 Chevelles.

d.      The transmission’s build date and ID Code stamped on the vertical surface of the passenger side of the main case is “P0C19A”.

                                                     i.     This means the transmission was assembled at the Muncie plant on March 19, 1970.

                                                    ii.     The “A” prefix denotes that this is a M-20 wide ratio four-speed transmission. The correct prefix is “C” for an M-22 four-speed transmission which was a mandatory option with for the LS5 Chevelle.

                                                   iii.     This transmission’s build date and ID info are same data listed on this vehicle’s Protecto-Plate

                                                   iv.     Build date of transmission is consistent with the body assembly date of fifth week of April 1970.

e.      The transmission’s VIN number stamped on the vertical surface of the passenger side of the main case is “10A155972”. This number matches the vehicles VIN number plate attached to the driver’s front corner of the windshield

                                                     i.     The VIN stamping on this transmission is not consistent will other original, unaltered transmissions. Close comparison of the VIN stamping on the engine when compared to the VIN stamping on the transmission show a slight difference in the character spacing. That is, the spacing is slightly wider on the transmission VIN than it is on the engine VIN. Unaltered stampings have the same character spacing on both the engine and transmission because both are applied at the factory with the same gang stamping.

 

  1. The Cowl Tag located on engine side of firewall, and the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Plate located in the front LH area on the dash panel behind the windshield are the original items installed by the General Motors factory when this vehicle was manufactured. Both items are attached to the vehicle with the original rivets and are unaltered.

a.      This cowl tag lists an exterior paint code of “75 75.”

                                                     i.     This code is correct for Cranberry Red top and bottom, with no vinyl top.

                                                    ii.     This data is consistent with the finish on this vehicle.

b.      This cowl tag lists an interior paint code of “756.”

                                                     i.     This code is correct for black vinyl bucket seats.

                                                    ii.     This data is consistent with the interior color and type for this vehicle.

c.      This cowl tag lists a body build date of “04E” or the fifth week of April, 1970.

                                                     i.     This data is consistent with the vehicle delivery date listed on this vehicle’s Protecto-Plate.


  1. Documentation includes the original Protecto-Plate Warranty Folder.

 

  1. Condition of vehicle now since a complete mechanical rebuild, partial restoration to correct OEM standards and operations dial-in completed in early 2012.

1.   Exterior Condition AFTER to 2011 partial restoration:

a.      Quality of paint and body work is excellent

b.      Panel fit is excellent

c.      New exact reproduction, dated coded LOF windshield has been installed

d.      Other exterior glass is in good original condition

e.      Both front and rear bumpers are original items that have been triple show chrome plated

f.       All exterior stainless steel trim around windshield and rear window has been removed, straightened and polished.

g.      All other exterior trim was in excellent condition

h.      SS wheels are good quality reproduction items

i.        Tires are exact reproduction F70 X 14 Firestone Wide Ovals

2.    Interior Condition AFTER to 2011 partial restoration:

a.      Seats, door panels, console, shifter, carpet and head liner are quality reproductions items with very little wear and no fading

b.      The shifter is a new Hurst Competition Plus shifter with correct console only handle.

c.      Foams in both front seats have been replaced. Seat covers fit correctly.

d.      Sail panels and headliner fit correctly

e.      All seat belts are original equipment in good original condition

f.       Correct original finishes have been applied to park brake and pedal assemblies

g.      Heater box has been removed, rebuilt as needed and new control cables installed.

h.      Heater defroster controls have been disassembled and cleaned and a new Delco blower switch installed.

i.        The complete dash was removed from vehicle; all gauges; speedometer and tachometer were serviced and restored as needed to make them fully operational.

j.        Replaced defective circuit board for gauges and dash lights

k.      The original AM/FM radio was serviced and repaired as needed.

l.        Original 10 ohm dash radio speaker rebuilt and re-coned as needed.

m.     Ventilation knobs replaced with correct exact reproduction parts

n.      Exact reproduction VIN and Build Date Tag from ECS has been installed on rear of drivers door

o.      All incorrect fasteners under dash have been replaced with either re-plated original fasteners or exact reproduction fasteners from AMK.

p.      Install new exact reproduction sun visor assemblies.

3.     Undercarriage Condition AFTER 2011 partial restoration:

a.      All surfaces of floor pan, differential, frame, front and rear suspension, steering, and brakes are rust-free and not pitted. Floor pans have no undercoating on them and there is no evidence of rust repair other than the RR quarter, inner quarter extension to trunk floor has been repaired.

b.      Factory type OEM, high density sound deadener has been installed in rear wheel tubs and area directly behind rear wheel tubs

c.      Exhaust system has been disassembled and redone so that it fits correctly under car.

d.      Incorrect exhaust hangers have been replaced.

e.      All incorrect fasteners have been replaced with either re-plated original fasteners or exact reproduction fasteners from AMK.

f.       All control arm bushings have been replaced.

g.      Upper ball joints, idler arm, tie rod ends, center link are new and have correct OEM finishes.

h.      Steering box has been completely resealed and rebuilt

i.        Power steering pump has been rebuilt and both hoses replaced

j.        Original drive shaft had  its front universal joint replaced and it has been balanced

k.      Differential yoke seal replaced and worn yoke repaired with redi-sleeve

l.        New correct size and height front coil springs have been installed on vehicle so that it sits at the correct curb height

m.     New complete clutch assembly installed and balanced.

n.      Correct clutch linkage installed.

o.      Original transmission completely rebuilt. All gear sets replaced with new best quality replacement parts. Transmission was damaged by input shaft alignment problem caused by the prior installation of cheap reproduction bell housing.

p.      Correct original #621 Bell housing purchased and installed.

q.      Brake components disassembled, cleaned as needed and converted to DOT 5 Silicon Brake Fluid

r.       Worn-out front brake rotors replaced with best available new replacements

s.      New correct zinc plated rotor shields have been installed.

t.       Both front brake calipers replaced with rebuilt original Delco Moraine items. New front brake pads installed.

u.      New rear brake cylinders installed, rear brake drums turned and shoes arched to correctly fit drums

v.      Replaced incorrect length park brake cables with correct new exact reproduction part

4.     Under hood Condition AFTER 2011 partial restoration:

a.      All incorrect fasteners under dash have been replaced with either re-plated original fasteners or exact reproduction fasteners from AMK.

b.      Hood hinges and catches have re-plated in the correct gray phosphate finish

c.      The cowl induction air cleaner has been powder coated in the correct gloss black finish

d.      Correct decals are installed on the core support, the engine and air cleaner assembly

e.       An exact reproduction R59 Delco Battery with Optima internals has been installed.

f.      New exact reproduction spring type battery cables are installed

g.      Master cylinder and rest of brake system has been disassembled, cleaned and converted to Silicon Brake Fluid

h.        Transmission Controlled Spark (TCS) parts have been purchased and installed on engine.

i.        All brackets on engine are either correct exact reproduction or original.

j.      The exhaust manifolds have been stripped, mating surfaces to heads have been machined so they fit correctly, Exterior of manifolds have been refinished with Hirsch paint.

k.        Engine was completely rebuilt and balanced by Greulich Machine.

l.     Fuel pump is the correct new exact reproduction item. Carburetor is a period correct quadrajet and has been completely rebuilt to factory specs.

m.      Distributor is a period correct item that has been rebuilt and re-curved for best all around performance

o.      All factory cowl induction electrical and vacuum components are correct and are fully operational.

n.      Disassembled steering column shaft, rag joint, etc. Refinished to correct OEM finishes

5.     Operations items resolved AFTER  2011 partial restoration:

a.      Cowl Induction Doors, Both Electric and Vacuum sides all restored, repaired and good correctly

b.      Both original horns rebuilt by Horn Works

c.       All lights and gauges work

d.      Clock rebuilt by Clock Works. Quartz movement installed.

e.      Heater and defroster. Cables now work. Blower motor works on all speeds

f.        Wipers rebuilt and wipers work correctly

6.     Other issues resolved AFTER 2011 partial restoration:

a.      Original engine completely rebuilt and balanced.

b.      Period correct Quadrajet carb completely rebuilt and installed.s

c.      New complete clutch assembly installed and balanced.

d.      Pinion seal for original differential replaced and yoke repaired.



 

 

Auto Services in Arizona

Twentyfifth Street Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 4112 N 25th St, Guadalupe
Phone: (480) 447-6879

Tru-Tek ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Machine Shop, Machine Shops
Address: 541 E Juanita Ave # 6, Higley
Phone: (480) 424-4938

Thomas Bishop Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3414 E Washington St, Guadalupe
Phone: (602) 225-9225

Sonny`s Upholstery ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Patio Covers & Enclosures, Patio & Outdoor Furniture
Address: 323 W Southern Ave Suite B, Carefree
Phone: (480) 921-0077

Samson Body Shop Service Center Auto Glass Towing and RV Service ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing, Motor Homes
Address: 1709B Lizard Ln, Holbrook
Phone: (928) 297-0274

Ramirez Wheel Fashion ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Lifts-Automotive & Truck, Tire Dealers
Address: 4324 W Northern Ave, Goodyear
Phone: (623) 847-1804

Auto blog

2016 Chevy Malibu exhaustively tested with four decades of data

Fri, Mar 13 2015

Chevy is preparing to unveil its new Malibu sedan at the upcoming New York Auto Show next month. But when it does, it's not like it will have appeared overnight. The development of any new vehicle – especially one as widely produced by a major automaker as the Malibu – involves rigorous and relentlessly punishing tests. In the Malibu's case, that meant 1.5 million miles of driving from the scorching heat of Arizona in July to the frigid cold of northern Canada in January and everything in between. The Bowtie brand also says it incorporated four decades' worth of data taken from vehicles driving in locations around the world since 1972 in order to make the Malibu the best it could be. We'll have to wait to find out the results of all that exhaustive testing, but you can catch a sneak peek at the new sedan in the video above. Four Decades of Data Used to Test 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Recorded customer use drives durability testing for next-generation midsize sedan 2015-03-11 DETROIT – Data collected over decades from across the globe is helping ensure the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu can handle the world's worst roads even if the all-new midsize sedan never drives on them. Data collection boxes are placed in cars in real-world driving conditions around the world. Since 1972, these devices have accurately recorded the harshness and frequency of every jounce, bump and shudder inflicted on the car on roads in the U.S., Russia, Saudi Arabia and developing markets. "Although most Malibu owners will never put their car through similar abuse, we test all new vehicles in extreme climates, inclement weather and on punishing road surfaces," said Dan Devine, Malibu validation engineer. "The 2016 Malibu is definitely up to these challenges." Tests like these ensured the current generation Malibu was dependable and durable, two qualities that in turn helped Malibu stand out from its rivals in important quality surveys, such as J.D. Power's Initial Quality Study and Vehicle Dependability Study. General Motors engineers analyze the data to calculate the precise amount of damage potholes and other hazards create over 150,000 miles. Then the conditions are replicated at GM's Milford Proving Ground in Michigan on three unique road courses, each riddled with simulated potholes of increasing severity. Engineers run preproduction cars through the course up to hundreds of times.

Consumer Reports no longer recommends Honda Civic

Mon, Oct 24 2016

Consumer Reports annual Car Reliability Survey is out, and yes, there are some big surprises. First and foremost? The venerable publication no longer recommends the Honda Civic. In fact, aside from the walking-dead CR-Z and limited-release Clarity fuel-cell car, the Civic is the only Honda to miss out on CR's prestigious nod. At the opposite end there's a surprise as well – Toyota and Lexus remain the most reliable brands on the market, but Buick cracked the top three. That's up from seventh last year, and the first time for an American brand to stand on the Consumer Reports podium. Mazda's entire lineup earned Recommended checks as well. Consumer Reports dinged the Civic for its "infuriating" touch-screen radio, lack of driver lumbar adjustability, the limited selection of cars on dealer lots fitted with Honda's popular Sensing system, and the company's decision to offer LaneWatch instead of a full-tilt blind-spot monitoring system. Its score? A lowly 58. The Civic isn't the only surprise drop from CR's Recommended ranks. The Audi A3, Ford F-150, Subaru WRX/STI, and Volkswagen Jetta, GTI, and Passat all lost the Consumer Reports' checkmark. On the flipside, a number of popular vehicles graduated to the Recommended ranks, including the BMW X5, Chevrolet Camaro, Corvette, and Cruze, Hyundai Santa Fe, Porsche Macan, and Tesla Model S. Perhaps the biggest surprise is the hilariously recall-prone Ford Escape getting a Recommended check – considering the popularity of Ford's small crossover, this is likely a coup for the brand, as it puts the Escape on a level playing field with the Recommended Toyota RAV4, Honda CR-V, and Nissan Rogue. While Ford is probably happy to see CR promote the Escape, the list wasn't as kind for every brand. For example, of the entire Fiat Chrysler Automobiles catalog, the ancient Chrysler 300 was the only car to score a check – there wasn't a single Dodge, Fiat, Jeep, Maserati, or Ram on the list. That hurts. FCA isn't alone at the low end, either. GMC, Jaguar Land Rover, Mini, and Mitsubishi don't have a vehicle on CR's list between them, while brands like Mercedes-Benz, Volvo, Nissan, Lincoln, Infiniti, and Cadillac only have a few models each. You can check out Consumer Reports entire reliability roundup, even without a subscription, here.

1983 Motorweek showdown pits Porsche 928S vs. Chevy Camaro Z28

Mon, Jan 12 2015

Last month, Motor Trend threw the Camaro Z/28 and Porsche 911 GT3 into the bear pit and let them fight it out. Way back in 1983, MotorWeek had the same idea, comparing the Camaro Z/28 to the Porsche 928S. At the time, the Camaro was America's best selling sports coupe, the 928S was Porsche's top-of-the-line model that also had the highest top speed of any car sold here. And the price differential was even more stark then: $13,600 for the Camaro, $45,000 for the Porsche. That put the Z/28's cast-iron, 5.0-liter V8 with 190 horsepower and 240 pound-feet of torque against the all-aluminum 4.7-liter V8 with 234 hp and 263 lb-ft in the 928S. Even with that and the Camaro being 14 inches longer than the Porsche, the American was a surprising 40 pounds lighter than the German. The show took them to Summit Point Raceway in West Virginia to see how close a relative performance bargain could hang with a the German GT. Both had five-speed manual transmissions, but the high-speed corners and tight sections of Summit Point would test other handling variables, including the "bone-rattling" Camaro's solid rear axle and disc and drum brake setup vis-a-vis the four-wheel disc brakes and independent suspension on the "firm-but-smooth" Porsche. Paradoxically, the larger disparity 22 years ago resulted in a closer result. Check out the video to see how the Summit was won. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Porsche Coupe Luxury Performance Classics Videos chevy camaro z28 porsche 928 retro review