Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Chevelle Ss Drag Car / Pro Street on 2040-cars

Year:1966 Mileage:80867 Color: Blue /
 Black
Location:

Austin, Minnesota, United States

Austin, Minnesota, United States
Body Type:Coupe
Engine:None
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: 138 Year: 1966
Mileage: 80,867
Make: Chevrolet
Exterior Color: Blue
Model: Chevelle
Interior Color: Black
Trim: N/A
Drive Type: two wheel drive
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1966 Chevelle SS Drag Car:   all plexiglass windows, Disk brakes front and rear (Aerospace component brakes), Strang shocks, aluminum tubs with 4 link, Chassis Work FAB 9 rear end, 488 gears (I think).  Front tires are 26.0/ 4.5 by 15.  Rear tires are 32.0/ 14.5 by 15.  Face of slicks 16" on the ground.  Car has been sitting for 6 years, so tires will need to be replaced.  Centerline rims.  Rear wheel openings have been rolled under so slick won't hit.  Stock dash.  Stock front and rear lights. Hooker competition hedders.  Fiberglass hood, front bumper and trunk lid; everything else is steel.  One bracket on the trunk lid is broken.  The car was tubbed and roll cage done by Quick Performance out of Ames, Iowa.  Car had a big block with powerglide.  I have driveshaft, tranny brace and hedders.  NO motor, transmission, radiator or fuel cell.  The car has bondo in the lower front fenders behind the wheel, otherwise, very solid.  Rotors are rusty from sitting.  The paint has chips and scratches...most of the graphics on the car are stickers.  Paint looks better in the picture than it is.  Have title in my name for this 138 car-tag on fire wall and tag on door post are there.  Any questions, call 515 851 8023.

Auto Services in Minnesota

St. Anthony Mobil ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 2801 Kenzie Ter, Saint-Louis-Park
Phone: (612) 789-5148

Rongo`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3548 Nicollet Ave, Saint-Louis-Park
Phone: (612) 823-7939

Prior Lake Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 16783 Toronto Ave SE, Prior-Lake
Phone: (952) 679-8734

Precision Auto Upholstery ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 8579 Jefferson Hwy, Wayzata
Phone: (612) 360-2044

Precision Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 11110 61st St NE, Otsego
Phone: (763) 497-1677

Plymouth Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 10905 Old County Road 15, Medicine-Lake
Phone: (763) 250-1408

Auto blog

Best car infotainment systems: From UConnect to MBUX, these are our favorites

Sun, Jan 7 2024

Declaring one infotainment system the best over any other is an inherently subjective matter. You can look at quantitative testing for things like input response time and various screen load times, but ask a room full of people that have tried all car infotainment systems what their favorite is, and you’re likely to get a lot of different responses. For the most part, the various infotainment systems available all share a similar purpose. They aim to help the driver get where they're going with navigation, play their favorite tunes via all sorts of media playback options and allow folks to stay connected with others via phone connectivity. Of course, most go way beyond the basics these days and offer features like streaming services, in-car performance data and much more. Unique features are aplenty when you start diving through menus, but how they go about their most important tasks vary widely. Some of our editors prefer systems that are exclusively touch-based and chock full of boundary-pushing features. Others may prefer a back-to-basics non-touch system that is navigable via a scroll wheel. You can compare it to the phone operating system wars. Just like some prefer Android phones over iPhones, we all have our own opinions for what makes up the best infotainment interface. All that said, our combined experience tells us that a number of infotainment systems are at least better than the rest. WeÂ’ve narrowed it down to five total systems in their own subcategories that stand out to us. Read on below to see our picks, and feel free to make your own arguments in the comments. Best infotainment overall: UConnect 5, various Stellantis products Ram 1500 Uconnect Infotainment System Review If thereÂ’s one infotainment system that all of us agree is excellent, itÂ’s UConnect. It has numerous qualities that make it great, but above all else, UConnect is simple and straightforward to use. Ease of operation is one of the most (if not the single most) vital parts of any infotainment system interface. If youÂ’re expected to be able to tap away on a touchscreen while driving and still pay attention to the road, a complex infotainment system is going to remove your attention from the number one task at hand: driving. UConnect uses a simple interface that puts all of your key functions in a clearly-represented row on the bottom of the screen. Tap any of them, and it instantly pulls up that menu.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.

Nissan Leaf has 2nd-best sales month ever, Chevy Volt does a 2013 repeat [UPDATE]

Tue, Apr 1 2014

UPDATE: The official press release says that "Volt [sales were] up 7 percent," but Randy Fox let AutoblogGreen know that this is simply due to a change in the fleet/retail mix between March 2013 and 2014. The actual number sold was exactly the same in the two months. A month ago, Nissan's director of EV sales and marketing, Toby Perry, said he expected to see the Leaf's sales momentum continue into March. It wasn't a big leap, since January and February were slow sales months in 2013 (around 640 each) before a big climb to 2,200 in March. In 2014, the first two months of the year were better (around 1,300 each) but Nissan can still be happy that the Leaf just had the best March ever and its second-highest sales month ever, with 2,507 sold. That's a 12.1 percent increase from 2013 and Perry said in a statement to AutoblogGreen that one reason is all of the buyers who are becoming evangelists for the vehicle. "We've also seen an increase in showroom traffic as we enhanced our marketing presence in March," he said. Nissan pointed to cities like Washington, DC, Raleigh-Durham, NC and urban areas in Texas as strong Leaf markets last month. On the Chevy Volt front, January and February were also slow months in 2014, down roughly half from the 2,000-ish the plug-in hybrid was selling at the end of 2013. For 2014, sales were up slightly from the first two months of the year and Chevy spokesman Randy Fox told AutoblogGreen that the March number was "pretty flat, year-over-year." Even with that warning, we were surprised to see the total come in at 1,478. Why's that? Because the total for March 2013 was ... 1,478. So, yeah, that's pretty steady even if there were 26 selling days in March period this year compared to 27 last year. As always, our more complete report of last month's green car sales will be coming soon. News Source: General Motors, Nissan Green Chevrolet GM Nissan Electric Hybrid PHEV ev sales