1965 Chrvrolet Chevelle Super Sport Z-16 Tribute~ Done Well on 2040-cars
Dublin, California, United States
Engine:454 LS6
Body Type:HARDTOP
Vehicle Title:Clear
Exterior Color: CROCUS YELLOW
Make: Chevrolet
Interior Color: Black
Model: Chevelle
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: SUPER SPORT Z16
Drive Type: T400
Mileage: 51,000
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Based on an original Crocus Yellow Super Sport 138 Fremont built car. This Z16 Tribute captures much of the feel and allure of an original Kansas City Z16, at 1/3 the cost.
- Z16 TRIBUTE BASED ON AN ORIGINAL FREMONT CA. 138 CAR ( MY NEIGHBOR INSTALLED THE INTERIOR AT THE FREMONT GM PLANT ).
- RUST FREE BODY AND FRAME THAT IS NOW FINISHED TO LOOK NEW.
- VERY DETAILED FRAME.
- T-3 HEADLIGHTS.
- CORRECT CLOCK.
- GREAT WORKING AM RADIO.
- MULTIPLEX UNIT, IF YOU GET A GM AM/FM RADIO.
- MUNTZ 4/8 TRACK THAT WAS NOS WHEN I INSTALLED IT, PLUS 45 TAPES.
- POWER STEERING.
- POWER FRONT DISK BRAKES.
- DETAILED ENGINE COMPARTMENT.
- CORRECT DUAL SNORKEL AIR CLEANER, WITH CORRECT DIE CAST EMBLEM.
- 454 WITH AN LS6 CASTING NUMBER AND A MILD CAM, IS IT SWEET SOUNDING. PREFERS 100 OCTANE BUT RUNS WELL ON 93 OCTANE.
- TURBO 400.
- ORIGINAL GLASS, EXCEPT WINDSHIELD.
- NICE RUBBER,FELTS , AND BRIGHT HARDWARE.
- BY BIDDING YOUR ARE ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT WITH ME IN THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CALIFORNIA. FOR LEGAL PURPOSES , DUBLIN CALIFORNIA IS THE PLACE OF THE SALE - NOT YOUR HOUSE OR PO BOX.
- I REQUIRE A $700 ( SEVEN HUNDRED ) DOLLAR , NON-REFUNDABLE, DEPOSIT VIA PAY PAL WITHIN 48 HOURS.
- THE VEHICLE MUST BE PAID FOR, IN FULL, WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS. CASH, CASHIERS CHECK ( HELD FOR 1 FULL BUSINESS DAY ), OR WIRE TRANSFER ARE THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF PAYMENT.
- IF YOU WIN THE AUCTION, THAT DOES NOT START THE NEGOTIATIONS, OR INSPECTION PERIOD.
- I WILL DO EVERYTHING I CAN TO ANSWER QUESTIONS, MEET WITH APPRAISERS, WORK WITH YOUR BANK AND SHIPPERS. PLEASE DON'T GET CRAZY.
- I HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF EXPERIENCE ON EBAY AND HAVE SEEN ALL THE TRICKS, SO IF YOU ARE THE OWNER OF ZERO FEEDBACK OR NEGATIVE FEEDBACK- I WILL CANCEL YOUR ATTEMPT TO BID, SORRY.
Chevrolet Chevelle for Sale
- 1966 chevelle factory ss 138 drag race car(US $13,999.00)
- 64 chevy malibu 489 cu.in. "awesome muscle car" !
- One owner 1965 chevelle body off rebuilt in 2003, wiring needs completed
- 1970 super sport chevrolet chevelle(US $29,999.00)
- 1969 chevy chevelle
- 1971 chevell malibu; very clean; matching numbers(US $16,500.00)
Auto Services in California
Zube`s Import Auto Sales ★★★★★
Yosemite Machine ★★★★★
Woodland Smog ★★★★★
Woodland Motors Chevrolet Buick Cadillac GMC ★★★★★
Willy`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Western Brake & Tire ★★★★★
Auto blog
MotorWeek's 80's GM muscle coupe roundup includes Regal GN and Monte Carlo SS
Thu, Jan 29 2015Even with just four brands in the family, General Motors still represents a performance powerhouse. Between the Chevrolet Corvette Z06, Camaro Z/28, Cadillac CTS-V and ATS-V, The General can still deliver plenty of thrills. The 1980s, though, saw the brand go even crazier with performance. While the Camaro and Corvette were still around back in the day, GM had a number of other interesting performance offerings. The Bowtie was complemented by the long-deceased Monte Carlo SS, while the now-defunct Pontiac and Oldsmobile offered the Grand Prix and thumping 442, respectively. And Buick, which isn't short on performance with its Regal GS and Verano Turbo, offered a much more serious vehicle, in the form of the Grand National (not to mention the Darth Vader-spec GNX). MotorWeek, in its hugely entertaining retro flashbacks, looks back on these three long-lost GM performance icons, and it's just as good as you might expect. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Buick Chevrolet GM Pontiac Coupe Performance Classics Videos buick grand national chevy monte carlo oldsmobile 442
GM recalls Cadillac ATS and Chevy Impala for separate issues
Fri, Feb 27 2015The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration added two recalls from General Motors in the government organization's daily update of safety campaigns. Both were for failing to meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards but for completely separate reasons. The larger recall covers 58,698 units of the 2013-2015 Cadillac ATS, but it doesn't really carry huge safety concerns. In vehicles produced between April 25, 2012, and February 9, 2015, the controls for the tilt and slide of the moonroof are not recessed enough, as required by federal law. According to NHTSA, it's possible that someone could inadvertently activate the auto-close for the roof panel, which the agency claims increases "the risk of personal injury." Dealers will install a new trim plate that will add the necessary clearance. The other campaign covers 1,177 examples of the 2014 Chevrolet Impala from between November 15, 2012, and May 27, 2014. However, this is actually a repeat of a previous recall on the Chevy and the Cadillac XTS from 2014. The affected Impalas here "were remedied incorrectly" under the earlier campaign, according to NHTSA. On these sedans, it's possible the electronic parking brake might not fully disengage and still remain in some contact with the rotor, which is in violation of federal rules. The fault can cause excessive heat from the brakes that could potentially lead to a fire, according to NHTSA. To fix the problem, dealers will reprogram the electronic parking brake control module. Show full PR text RECALL Subject : Inadvertent Press of Roof Panel Switch/FMVSS 118 Report Receipt Date: FEB 24, 2015 NHTSA Campaign Number: 15V106000 Component(s): VISIBILITY Potential Number of Units Affected: 58,698 All Products Associated with this Recall Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) CADILLAC ATS 2013-2015 Details Manufacturer: General Motors LLC SUMMARY: General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013-2015 Cadillac ATS vehicles manufactured April 25, 2012, to February 9, 2015. In the affected vehicles, the power-operated roof panels auto-close when the non-recessed "Slide" or "Tilt" switches are pressed. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) No.
IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving
Tue, Oct 11 2022WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.