Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

96 Caprice 9c1 Goverment Vehicle Impala Clone on 2040-cars

US $7,500.00
Year:1996 Mileage:28310 Color: Black /
 GREY
Location:

Woodland, California, United States

Woodland, California, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.7L 350Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1G1BL52P0TR136225 Year: 1996
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Caprice
Trim: Classic Sedan 4-Door
Options: Leather Seats
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 28,310
Sub Model: 9C1
Number of Doors: 4
Exterior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Interior Color: GREY
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

THIS IS THE VERY RARE 1996 CAPRICE CLASSIC 9C1 GOVERNMENT VEHICLE WITH ONLY 28,310 ORG MILES. PURCHASE WITH CONFIDENCE IT HAS A CLEAN CAR FAX AND CLEAR TITLE. I PURCHASED THE 9C1 CAPRICE WITH 25,325 MILES ALREADY CLONED IN JAN. 2012 WITH A 5YR OR 100,000 MILE WARRANTY, ALTHOUGH I'M NOT SURE IF IT'S TRANSFERABLE. I MADE THE PURCHASE FROM A DEALERSHIP IN ORANGE COUNTY, CA. AND  DROVE THE CAR HOME OVER 400 MILES AWAY. LET ME A SURE YOU THIS CAR IS A BEAST! THE ENGINE IS AMAZING AND DRIVES LIKE NEW. BECAUSE THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT VEHICLE AND IT'S OVER 17 YEARS OLD THE BODY/PAINT AND INTERIOR HAS MINOR IMPERFECTIONS. I PURCHASED THE CAR WITH THIS IN MIND. THE CAR COULD USE NEW SHOCKS AND TIRES. HAVING SAID THAT THIS AMAZING CAR IS READY FOR A DAILY DRIVER NOW FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS SOLID. THE CAR ALSO HAS A LOT OF POTENTIAL FOR RESTORATION OR MAKEOVERS. I HAVE A PASSION FOR CARS AND MAYBE ONE TO MANY, SO I'M NOT LOOKING TO MAKE PROFIT, IN FACT I'M LOSING. I PAID MORE FOR THE CAR, THAN WHAT I'M SELLING IT FOR. SERIOUS BUYERS ONLY, THANKS. CALL 530-662-6211

Auto Services in California

Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 2175 Market St, Pacifica
Phone: (888) 355-8508

Woodland Motors Chevrolet Buick Cadillac GMC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1680 E Main St, Zamora
Phone: (888) 990-7501

Willy`s Auto Repair Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 963 Harrison street,, San-Quentin
Phone: (415) 771-8805

Westside Body & Paint ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supplies
Address: 5054 W Avenue M2, Leona-Valley
Phone: (661) 943-3639

Westcoast Autobahn ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 841 W Collins Ave, Cowan-Heights
Phone: (714) 997-7888

Westcoast Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 5180 Holt Blvd # A, Chino-Hills
Phone: (909) 900-0000

Auto blog

Buick Encore, Chevy Trax earn Top Safety Pick from IIHS [w/video]

Thu, Feb 12 2015

The Buick Encore has been a massive sales success practically from the moment it debuted, and Buick recently decided to increase production to keep up with demand for the premium compact crossover. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently put one to the test again, and the Encore earned a Top Safety Pick award. It's the first model from the brand to score the nod since 2013, according to the IIHS, and the rating also carries over to the 2015 Chevrolet Trax. The 2015 Encore scored a Good rating in all of the IIHS' evaluations, including the 40-mile-per-hour, small overlap front crash test. That was a big improvement over the previous model the institute tested, which scored a Poor result in the overlap test. In the first test, about 13 inches of the lower door hinge pillar came into the passenger compartment, and the steering wheel airbag moved too far to protect the dummy's head. Improvements for the latest model year showed six inches of intrusion this time, and the airbags caught the dummy's head well. The dummy's sensors also indicated a low risk of injury. The two CUVs missed out on the full Top Safety Pick+ because the IIHS scored the Encore as only having a basic front crash prevention system, and there was no such equipment for the Trax. To earn the highest mark, models need at least an advanced rating by the institute for this technology. Buick Encore, Chevrolet Trax earn 2015 TOP SAFETY PICK award ARLINGTON, Va. - A small SUV is the first vehicle from the Buick brand to qualify for a TOP SAFETY PICK award from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety since 2013. The Buick Encore's newly introduced, lower-priced twin, the Chevrolet Trax, also qualifies for the honor. The Encore's award follows improvements to the SUV's structure for better small overlap front protection. The 2015 model earns a good rating in the small overlap test. In contrast, the 2013-14 Encore rated poor in the test. The driver's space was seriously compromised with intrusion measuring as much as 13 inches at the lower door hinge pillar. The dummy's head barely contacted the front airbag before sliding off the left side, as the steering column moved to the right. The side curtain airbag deployed too late and didn't have sufficient forward coverage to protect the head. In the latest test, the driver space was maintained reasonably well, with maximum intrusion of 6 inches at the door hinge pillar and instrument panel. The dummy's movement was well-controlled.

1983 Motorweek showdown pits Porsche 928S vs. Chevy Camaro Z28

Mon, Jan 12 2015

Last month, Motor Trend threw the Camaro Z/28 and Porsche 911 GT3 into the bear pit and let them fight it out. Way back in 1983, MotorWeek had the same idea, comparing the Camaro Z/28 to the Porsche 928S. At the time, the Camaro was America's best selling sports coupe, the 928S was Porsche's top-of-the-line model that also had the highest top speed of any car sold here. And the price differential was even more stark then: $13,600 for the Camaro, $45,000 for the Porsche. That put the Z/28's cast-iron, 5.0-liter V8 with 190 horsepower and 240 pound-feet of torque against the all-aluminum 4.7-liter V8 with 234 hp and 263 lb-ft in the 928S. Even with that and the Camaro being 14 inches longer than the Porsche, the American was a surprising 40 pounds lighter than the German. The show took them to Summit Point Raceway in West Virginia to see how close a relative performance bargain could hang with a the German GT. Both had five-speed manual transmissions, but the high-speed corners and tight sections of Summit Point would test other handling variables, including the "bone-rattling" Camaro's solid rear axle and disc and drum brake setup vis-a-vis the four-wheel disc brakes and independent suspension on the "firm-but-smooth" Porsche. Paradoxically, the larger disparity 22 years ago resulted in a closer result. Check out the video to see how the Summit was won. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Porsche Coupe Luxury Performance Classics Videos chevy camaro z28 porsche 928 retro review

GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect

Tue, 17 Aug 2010

2010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.