2013 Chevrolet Camaro on 2040-cars
Hinsdale, Illinois, United States
If you have questions email email me at: genovevagttarnowski@pi8.com .
THE ABSOLUTE MOST BEAUTIFUL CAMAROS IN THE COUNTRY. ALL PARTS WERE HAND PICKED AND ONLY THE BEST FOR HER. THIS CAR WAS
PROFESSIONALLY BUILT BY NICKEY PERFORMANCE AND CUSTOM PAINT AND BODY WAS ALL DONE BY SHOWSTOPPER IN ST.CHARLES IL.
THE CAR WAS TUNED BY ONE OF THE BEST LS SHOPS IN THE COUNTRY SPEED INC AND LAID DOWN AN ASTONISHING 489.82RWHP AND
443.21RWTQ. BELOW IS A LIST OF ALL MODIFICATION PERFORMED. THERE IS OVER 20K INVESTED INTO THIS CAR AND ITS YOUR
TIME TO GET IT AT A FRACTION OF THE COST. MY LOSS YOUR GAIN. ALL PART HAVE LESS THAN 5K ON THEM. IF YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTION FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME
ENGINE MODIFICATIONS:
LG MOTORSPORTS LG6X3 CAM
COMP 921 DUAL VALVE SPRINGS
COMP SPRING SEAT
COMP TI SPRING RETAINERS
COMP VALVE SEALS
COMP CHROMOLY PUSH RODS
KATECH TIMING CHAIN AND DAMPNER
SLP 25% UNDER DRIVE PULLEY WITH ARP CRANK BOLT
NGK PLUGS
MSD 8.5 SUPER CONDUCTOR WIRES
LG COLD AIR INTAKE SYSTEM
ELITE OIL CATCH CAN
ALL AMZOIL PRODUCTS USED
EXHAUST:
TEXAS SPEED 2" RACING HEADERS CATLESS
3" MAGNAFLOW EXHAUST
DRIVETRAIN:
MGW SHORT THROW SHIFTER
NICKEY POWDER COATED BRAKE CALIPERS
NICKEY DRILLED AND SLOTTED ROTORS
LG MOTORSPORTS LOWERING SPRINGS 1.5" DROP
ZL1 WHEELS 20X10 FRONT 20X11 REARS
GOODYEAR TIRES ALL AROUND LESS THAN 5K MILES
GORILLA LUG NUTS.
INTERIOR:
DUAL A PILLER GAUDGE POD
AUTOMETER COBALT AIR AND FUEL GAUDGE
AUTOMETER COBALT FUEL PRESSURE GAUGE
LLOYD FLOOR MATS
EXTERIOR: ALL WORK DONE BY SHOWSTOPPERS
GHOSTED LED SIDE MIRRORS
GHOSTED LED SIDE MARKERS
CUSTOM PAINT ON FORNT/ REAR BUMPERS/ HOOD/ MIRRORS AND REAR SPOILER
REAR RK DOVE TAIL SPORT SPOILER
PRO CUSTOM HIDE AWAY HEADLIGHT COVERS
PIRATE BILLET SIDE VENT INSERTS
REAR TAIL LIGHT BEZELS MATTE BLACK
CAR IS COMPLETELY DE-BADGED
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
2014 chevrolet camaro ss 1le(US $13,600.00)
2012 chevrolet camaro zl1(US $11,500.00)
2010 chevrolet camaro 2ss(US $10,000.00)
2011 chevrolet camaro(US $10,000.00)
2011 chevrolet camaro 2-ss rs loaded(US $10,000.00)
2011 chevrolet camaro rs(US $10,000.00)
Auto Services in Illinois
World Class Motor Cars ★★★★★
Wilkins Hyundai-Mazda ★★★★★
Unibody ★★★★★
Turpin Chevrolet Inc ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Triple T Car Wash Lube & Detail Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
Driving the 2021 Chevy Tahoe and big news from Hyundai | Autoblog Podcast #640
Fri, Aug 14 2020In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by News Editor Joel Stocksdale. They discuss some of the big trucks Joel drove: the 2021 Chevy Tahoe and a Mil-Spec-modified Ford F-150. After that is a look at the latest car news including Trofeo versions of Maserati's sedans, Hyundai's new electric brand called Ioniq, and the BMW M3 Touring station wagon and Hyundai Elantra N-Line. They wrap things up with some musings on anniversary of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution and how cars played a role in it. Autoblog Podcast #640 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Reviews2021 Chevy Tahoe Mil-Spec Ford F-150 Maserati Ghibli and Quattroporte Trofeo models revealed Ioniq becomes EV brand for Hyundai 2021 Hyundai Elantra N Line revealed BMW finally announces an M3 station wagon The 19th Amendment and how cars fit in Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: Government/Legal Green Podcasts BMW Chevrolet Ford Hyundai Maserati
This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location
Thu, Apr 28 2016Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.
Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout
Tue, Nov 25 2014Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.