Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Chevrolet Camaro 2-ss Rs Loaded on 2040-cars

US $10,000.00
Year:2011 Mileage:25048 Color: Green /
 Gray
Location:

Walker, West Virginia, United States

Walker, West Virginia, United States
Advertising:

If you have any questions feel free to email me at: lissette.europe@clovermail.net . ONE LADY OWNED 2011 2-SS CAMARO BOUGHT NEW IN SEPT. 2011.COLOR IS SPECIAL SYNERGY METALLIC GREEN WHICH WAS A VERY
LIMITED EDITION COLOR.(11% CAMARO S.S. WERE THIS COLOR ONLY IN 2011) CAR FEATURES CYBER GRAY METALLIC RALLY
STRIPES. MOTOR IS A LS-3 - 6.2L PRODUCING OVER 426 HORSEPOWER THROUGH A M10 - 6 SPEED MANUAL (ONLY 575 W/ MANUAL)
ONLY 1569 SYNERGY GREEN S.S. CAMARO WERE PRODUCED IN 2011 , WHICH WAS THE ONLY YEAR FOR SYNERGY GREEN V-8. INTERIOR
FEATURES SYNERGY GREEN ACCENT TRIM W/ LED LITE DOOR PANELS. RARE 2011 "TWO-TONE " HEATED GREY LEATHER SEATS. CAR IS
COMPLETELY LOADED. ALSO INCLUDES HEADS-UP DISPLAY - NAVIGATION - CAMARO PRINTED FLOOR MATS AND OPTIONAL CAMARO LOGO
TRUNK MAT. SHE HAS NEVER DRIVEN THIS CAR DURING WINTER MONTHS AND ALSO HAS HAD ONLY APPROX. 6300 MILES PER @
SUMMER. CAMARO HAS NEW (LESS THAN 50 MILES) FALKEN G4 TIRES W/ 50.000 MILE WEAR WARRANTY AND CAPABLE OF SPEEDS OF
180 M.P.H. RATING. (TIRES COST $850.00) CAMARO HAS FACTORY WARRANTY OF 5 YEAR / 100,000 MILE DRIVE TRAIN & ROADSIDE
ASSISTANT , 6 YEAR / 100,000 MILE RUST WARRANTY . THIS CAMARO STILL LQQKS NEW , SMELLS NEW , DRIVES / RUNS LIKE
NEW. HAS HAD EXCEPTIONAL CARE . THIS HAS BEEN MY WIFES CAR , CAR HAS NOT BEEN DRIVEN HARD , OR RACED LIKE MANY
OTHER SS CAMARO'S OF THIS CALIBER.

Auto Services in West Virginia

Thumpin Car Stereo Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems, Consumer Electronics
Address: 17715 Virginia Ave Ste 1, Hedgesville
Phone: (301) 739-8814

Saffford Chrysler Jeep Dodge ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1659 Berryville Pike, Ridgeway
Phone: (540) 667-5532

Roy`s Quality Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Auto Transmission
Address: 8 E Oak Ridge Dr, Falling-Waters
Phone: (301) 733-1771

Griff`s Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 409 E 8th St, Mineral-Wells
Phone: (304) 485-9050

Fisher Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 424 Fairmont Ave, Shinnston
Phone: (304) 363-9100

City Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 340 Dual Hwy, Falling-Waters
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Auto blog

Chevy Volt 'acceptable,' Nissan Leaf 'poor' in new IIHS safety tests

Thu, Jul 31 2014

Ford C-Max Hybrid also scored "acceptable" rating. With US Nissan Leaf sales up almost 30 percent during the first half of the year, the only thing that might be able to stop the battery-electric vehicle is a good, stiff barrier. Unfortunately, thing's aren't always pretty when that happens in the real world, according to new tests from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Things with the Chevrolet Volt extended-range plug-in are a little bit rosier, though. The two plug-in vehicles were part of a batch of a dozen vehicles that just went through the IIHS's "small overlap" test, in which the driver's side front corner of the vehicle is crashed into a rigid barrier at 40 miles per hour. Out of the dozen, only the Mini Cooper Countryman was given a "good" rating. Five vehicles, including the Volt and the Ford C-Max Hybrid, were rated "acceptable," two were "marginal" and two, including the Leaf, were "poor." Plug-in vehicles are unique in the crash-test context because of their relatively large battery sizes. In the Volt's case, the driver had a "low risk" of injury, said the IIHS. But the Leaf's crash substantially pushed back the instrument panel and steering column, creating a scenario where the driver was "likely" to sustain leg injuries. The batteries in both the Leaf and the Volt passed safety tests specifically targeted at things like thermo and electrical properties and overall integrity. "Nissan is proud of the Leaf's 'Good' rating in all other IIHS tests, a 4-star NCAP rating from NHTSA and its IIHS Top Safety Pick rating in all previous years since the car's release," the company said in an e-mail sent to AutoblogGreen. "As for the performance of the 2014 Leaf in the 'small overlap frontal test,' Nissan will continue to review these and other results from the IIHS 'small overlap frontal test' as we seek opportunities for improvement." Check out the IIHS's press release and small car crash-test video footage below. Range of ratings: Small car ratings run the gamut in challenging small overlap front test The Mini Cooper Countryman is the only small car to earn a good rating among the latest group of 12 cars subjected to the Institute's small overlap front crash test. Two electric models and a hybrid also are in the mix, with varied results. The electric-powered Chevrolet Volt (with a gasoline engine "range extender") earns an acceptable rating, while its battery-electric rival, the Nissan Leaf, earns a poor rating.

Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout

Tue, Nov 25 2014

Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.

Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.