Advertising:
2000 Camaro Ss 77k Miles on 2040-cars
Year:2000
Mileage:77325
Color:
Location:
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.7L 350Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.7L 350Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 2G1FP22G5Y2104658
Year: 2000
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Camaro
Trim: Z28 SS Coupe 2-Door
Options: T-tops, Cassette Player, Leather Seats, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 77,325
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Camaro
Trim: Z28 SS Coupe 2-Door
Options: T-tops, Cassette Player, Leather Seats, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 77,325
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
I'm selling my 2000 Camaro SS, which I bought in 2009. For most of the past 18 months, since I moved to the Washington DC area, the car has been in storage. I titled it in Maryland in January, and started driving it again until a few months ago. I hate to sell it, but I just don't have the room or the need for it in the city. I'd rather it be on the road somewhere.
Good things about the car:
Exterior: The paint is generally in very good shape. The hood (my favorite part about this car's looks) is in excellent shape. The original wheels are free of any curb rash. The T-tops don't leak. It still has the round exhausts that came with the SS, which make it look pretty unique compared to other Camaros of the era.
Mechanical: The LS1 engine runs very well, and pulls very strong. Other than a K&N airfilter, it is stock. It has an automatic transmission that shifts well. The battery is less than 6 months old. The car also has only 77,325 miles. The car had 66K when I bought it, and it has never given me any problems. It's a powerful car, and it wouldn't need much work to keep up with brand new muscle cars costing $30K more.
Interior: All guages work and are well lit. A/C still blows cold. The car still has the original Monsoon stereo system - a cassete player with a 6-disc cd changer in the trunk (I've never used the cd changer, so I can't say whether it works or not; the cassette player does work). The seats are covered in tan leather. There is very little wear on the driver's seat, and the material is in very good condition everywhere else. The driver's seat is power, and works perfectly. The steering wheel and shifter are leather-wrapped. There are no cracks in the dash or tears in the seats.
Bad things about the car:
Exterior: The first thing I'll mention is the crack in the front bumper, provided by a kind stranger the first week I pulled it out of storage. The second body issue is the small dent in the panel below the passenger door. No explanation for this, it was like that when I bought the car. I just forgot about it because it's so hard to notice.
Mechanical: The check engine light came on before I put it in storage - the code I got says it's an issue with the O2 sensor. I don't think the light ever came back on in the few months this year that I was driving it.
Interior: Front speakers need replaced (I preferred the sound of the LS1). The passenger's cup holder and sun visor both broke off, though I still have them. The passenger-side window is also a bit slow, but it still works.
I've tried to disclose everything that's wrong with the car. That being said, I am selling the car AS-IS. I make no warranties, express or implied, as to the car's condition. If anyone would like to see, inspect, or drive the car prior to bidding, please contact me and we can arrange a meeting. The buyer is responsible for picking up the car. It can be driven home (if you have plates), or you can send someone to pick it up. I have the title, and will release it once all the funds have cleared.
Thanks for looking.
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
1988 chevy camaro iroc-z 355cu in - fast car
2011 chevy camaro ss rs auto leather sunroof hud 47k mi texas direct auto(US $26,980.00)
2010 chevrolet orange 2 door camaro autographed by dale earnhardt jr.(US $34,000.00)
Inferno metallic orange with black call roland kantor 847-343-2721(US $55,995.00)
1969 camaro all orig numbers match rare 250 155 h.p 3 speed on tree/column(US $25,000.00)
Auto Services in Maryland
The Body Works of VA INC ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: Burtonsville
Phone: (866) 595-6470
Sarandos Automotive Technology Inc ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 818 York Rd, Fort-Howard
Phone: (443) 377-3517
Safety First Auto Repair ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service
Address: 52 Main St, Bentley-Springs
Phone: (717) 235-2203
Quick Lane ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1415 W Patrick St, Keedysville
Phone: (301) 668-8650
Prestige Automotive ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 200 W Padonia Rd Unit D, Glencoe
Phone: (410) 561-9696
Preferred Automotive Assoc ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Brake Repair
Address: 12356 Wilkins Ave, Colesville
Phone: (301) 881-8530
Auto blog
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
Driving the Toyota Supra, Honda Passport and BMW 3 Series | Autoblog Podcast #582
Fri, May 31 2019In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Green Editor John Beltz Snyder and West Coast Editor James Riswick. First, they talk about the cars they've been driving, including the Honda Passport, BMW 330i and Audi RS5. They follow up with notes about driving the Toyota Supra and 86, and whether Toyota's new sports car strategy makes sense. Then they discuss the news, including the Ferrari SF90 Stradale plug-in hybrid, a possible Renault-FCA merger, death rumors for the Jaguar XJ and thoughts on the upcoming Chevy Trailblazer. Autoblog Podcast #582 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Cars we're driving: 2019 Honda Passport 2019 BMW 330i 2019 Audi RS5 Sportback Toyota Supra, 86 and the company's sports car strategy In the news: Ferrari SF90 Stradale FCA and Renault Jaguar XJ going away? Chevy Trailblazer Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video:
2021 BMW M3 and M4 vs all the high-powered sport sedans and coupes
Wed, Sep 23 2020Should you have a found a way to get past that schnoz, you've probably digested some of the basic specs for the all-new 2021 BMW M3 sedan and M4 coupe specs. They're plenty impressive. There's also, basically, two sets of them thanks to the regular and Competition versions that differ in engine output and transmission type. But how do they compare to other ultra sport sedans and coupes? Well, we were wondering that too, so we fired up the Autoblog Comparison Spreadsheet Generator 5000 (aka me chained to my computer in a dark basement). Sadly, there are surprisingly few competitors for the 2021 BMW M3. Rival sedans include the Mercedes-AMG C 63 and the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio, along with the Audi RS 5 Sportback sedan/coupe/hatchback thing. There's no more Lexus IS F, the Cadillac CT4 Blackwing has yet to arrive and Jaguar doesn't offer a spicy XE R. Happily, there are more coupe rivals for the 2021 BMW M4, including the two-door versions of the AMG and Audi as well as the Lexus RC F. I also included the Ford Shelby GT350 and Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE. On paper, they align incredibly well. On the street and on a track, I can personally attest that these Americans are fully capable of keeping up and/or bettering the fancy-pants luxury brands (and let's not forget there are even more powerful, hardcore versions available). If they don't align in terms of price or prestige, whatever. OK, let's get to the spreadsheet. Let's start with the coupes and note that I didn't bother listing the dimensions for the M4 Competition and C 63 S as they are identical to their "lesser" siblings. I won't bother burning words explaining what you can see on the chart. Instead, I'll point out a few things that stood out to me. First, BMW M comes awfully close to matching the output of AMG's twin-turbo V8 despite having two fewer cylinders. Similarly, Audi manages to better the 0-60 time of the M4 Competition and tie the C 63 S despite being WAY down on power. It's not like it weighs less. Magic? Second, and speaking of 0-60 times, remember the importance that transmission and drivetrain make with them. It's not just horsepower and torque. An automatic will be quicker and easier to launch than a manual, while all-wheel drive provides more instantaneous and beneficial grip.